| Literature DB >> 33628777 |
Ewa Paszkiewicz-Kozik1, Agnieszka Paziewska2,3, Maria Kulecka2,3, Michalina Dąbrowska2, Anna Kluska2, Aneta Bałabas2, Magdalena Piątkowska2, Filip Ambrożkiewicz2, Joanna Tajer1, Włodzimierz Osiadacz1, Joanna Romejko-Jarosińska1, Martyna Kotarska1, Natalia Żeber-Lubecka3, Jakub Karczmarski2, Lidia Popławska1, Michał Mikula2, Piotr Rutkowski4, Jan Walewski1, Jerzy Ostrowski2,3.
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represent 15% and 20%, respectively, of all lymphoma types. The aim of this study was to identify and compare circulating serum miRNA (c-miRNA) and peripheral whole blood miRNA (wb-miRNA) profiles in patients with these lymphomas. Serum samples (20 HL, 21 DLBCL, and 30 healthy controls) and whole blood samples (21 HL, 17 DLBCL patients, and 30 healthy controls) were collected at the time of diagnosis. Serum and whole blood were also collected from 18 HL/17 DLBCL and eight HL/nine DLBCL patients, respectively, after treatment. Pairwise comparisons identified 125 c-miRNAs (adjusted P value < 0.05) showing significant dysregulation between 30 healthy controls and patients; of these, 47 and 55 differentiated controls from pretherapeutic HL and DLBCL patients, respectively. In addition, 60 and 16 c-miRNAs differentiated controls from posttherapeutic HL and DLBCL, respectively. Pairwise comparisons identified 292 wb-miRNAs (adjusted P value < 0.05) showing significant dysregulation between 30 controls and patients; of these, 103 and 169 differentiated controls from pretherapeutic HL and DLBCL, respectively, and 142 and 151 wb-miRNAs differentiated controls from posttherapeutic HL and DLBCL, respectively. Thus, lymphoma-associated miRNAs may be a better source of noninvasive candidate biomarkers than miRNAs in serum. It is unclear whether miRNA alterations in lymphoma cells are similar to those observed in white blood cells.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33628777 PMCID: PMC7880712 DOI: 10.1155/2021/3212878
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411