Tiffany L James1. 1. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, and Valley Healthcare System, Columbus, GA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Electronic health records (EHRs) and clinical decision-support algorithms improve diabetes care. This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to determine whether an electronic diabetes education referral protocol using the Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Algorithm of Care (DSMES Algorithm) and protocol training would increase the proportion of adult patients with type 2 diabetes at a federally qualified health center electronically referred for diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES). DESIGN AND METHODS: The EHR was modified to include the DSMES Algorithm and questions regarding prior participation in diabetes education. Protocol trainings were conducted. Data were obtained via retrospective chart review. A one-sample t test was used to evaluate the statistical difference between the electronic referral (e-referral) rates of the pre-intervention and intervention groups. RESULTS: Completion of the DSMES Algorithm was positively associated with e-referrals to diabetes education (P <0.001). The intervention group had a higher rate of e-referral for DSMES than the pre-intervention group (31 vs. 0%, P <0.001). CONCLUSION: E-referral protocols using the DSMES Algorithm and protocol training may aid in the identification and documentation of self-care needs of medically underserved patients with type 2 diabetes and improve e-referrals to DSMES. Of clinical importance, these findings translate into active patient engagement, team-based care, and information-sharing. Additional work is needed to determine whether the e-referral rate is sustained or increases over time. Further investigations should also be explored to evaluate the impact of e-referral protocols and algorithms on participation in DSMES.
OBJECTIVE: Electronic health records (EHRs) and clinical decision-support algorithms improve diabetes care. This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to determine whether an electronic diabetes education referral protocol using the Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Algorithm of Care (DSMES Algorithm) and protocol training would increase the proportion of adult patients with type 2 diabetes at a federally qualified health center electronically referred for diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES). DESIGN AND METHODS: The EHR was modified to include the DSMES Algorithm and questions regarding prior participation in diabetes education. Protocol trainings were conducted. Data were obtained via retrospective chart review. A one-sample t test was used to evaluate the statistical difference between the electronic referral (e-referral) rates of the pre-intervention and intervention groups. RESULTS: Completion of the DSMES Algorithm was positively associated with e-referrals to diabetes education (P <0.001). The intervention group had a higher rate of e-referral for DSMES than the pre-intervention group (31 vs. 0%, P <0.001). CONCLUSION: E-referral protocols using the DSMES Algorithm and protocol training may aid in the identification and documentation of self-care needs of medically underserved patients with type 2 diabetes and improve e-referrals to DSMES. Of clinical importance, these findings translate into active patient engagement, team-based care, and information-sharing. Additional work is needed to determine whether the e-referral rate is sustained or increases over time. Further investigations should also be explored to evaluate the impact of e-referral protocols and algorithms on participation in DSMES.
Authors: Margaret A Powers; Joan Bardsley; Marjorie Cypress; Paulina Duker; Martha M Funnell; Amy Hess Fischl; Melinda D Maryniuk; Linda Siminerio; Eva Vivian Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-06-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: William T Manard; Kevin Syberg; Anit Behera; Joanne Salas; F David Schneider; Eric Armbrecht; Denise Hooks-Anderson; Erica Crannage; Jeffrey Scherrer Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2016 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Midge N Ray; Ellen Funkhouser; Jessica H Williams; Rajani S Sadasivam; Gregg H Gilbert; Heather L Coley; D Brad Rindal; Thomas K Houston Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Dan Kent; Gail D'Eramo Melkus; Patricia Mickey W Stuart; June M McKoy; Patti Urbanski; Suzanne Austin Boren; Lola Coke; Janis E Winters; Neil L Horsley; Dawn Sherr; Ruth Lipman Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Linda Haas; Melinda Maryniuk; Joni Beck; Carla E Cox; Paulina Duker; Laura Edwards; Edwin B Fisher; Lenita Hanson; Daniel Kent; Leslie Kolb; Sue McLaughlin; Eric Orzeck; John D Piette; Andrew S Rhinehart; Russell Rothman; Sara Sklaroff; Donna Tomky; Gretchen Youssef Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Earle C Chambers; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Arthur E Blank; Judy Ouziel; Nicole Hollingsworth; Rachael W Riley; Peter A Selwyn Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Melanie J Davies; David A D'Alessio; Judith Fradkin; Walter N Kernan; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Apostolos Tsapas; Deborah J Wexler; John B Buse Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 19.112