The swim bladder in teleosts originates from an outgrowth of the anterior part of the
alimentary canal and does not exist in mammals. It is the primary organ for controlling
whole-body density, buoyancy, and sound production[1]. Anatomically, the swim bladder wall comprises two layers: the tunica
interna composed of a simple flat epithelium and the tunica exteria composed of connective
tissue[2], [3]. The volume of gas in the swim bladder is
controlled by the action of both a rete mirabile and a gas gland. The rete mirabile is a dense
bundle of parallel arterial and venous capillaries arranged side by side, and utilizes
countercurrent blood flow within the net to act as a countercurrent exchanger. The gas gland
comprises a folded cuboidal or columnar epithelium that secretes gas into the swim bladder. In
toxicity and field studies, limited pathological lesions of the swim bladder have been
reported[4], because this organ is not
routinely examined, although it is sometimes included by chance during sagittal or transverse
whole-body sectioning of smaller fish[5].
Additionally, since the swim bladder is often punctured and deflated during pathological
preparation, its lesions are commonly overlooked.Spontaneous swim bladder tumors are rare in teleosts, with only a few cases described in a
handful of species[6]. The swim bladder tumors
can be roughly classified into two types based on their origin: mesenchymal and epithelial
tumors. The former originate from the smooth muscle and/or fibroblastic tissues of the swim
bladder wall and are diagnosed as leiomyosarcomas[7] and/or fibrosarcomas[8],
[9]. These mesenchymal tumors occur
in salmon and are frequently associated with a retroviral infection[10]. The latter originate from the swim bladder epithelium and are
diagnosed as adenomas, papillary adenomas, and/or adenocarcinomas. Most spontaneous and
chemical-induced swim bladder tumors in the teleosts are categorized as gas gland epithelial
tumors. The epithelial tumors have been reported in medaka[11], mullet[12],
guppy[11], [13], cod[14], seahorse[15], and
Nothobranchius fish[16]. In the present study,
we encountered swim bladder tumors in three wavy medakas and described their detailed
histopathological features.Twenty-eight wavy medakas, aged about 2 years old, were sourced from the small stocks of wavy
medaka at the Biological Research Laboratory, Nissan Chemical Corporation. These stocks were
obtained via home breeding of some wavy medakas encountered naturally in the stocks maintained
at the laboratory. The fish were maintained in dechlorinated tap water at 25 ± 1°C under a
16:8-hour light:dark photoperiod. The wavy medakas and one normal medaka were sacrificed by
overexposure to CO2 gas and fixed in Bouin’s solution overnight, before being
refixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin. The fixed medakas were separated into two sections
by mid-sagittal cut, and both sections were embedded in paraffin, sectioned at a thickness of
4 µm, and stained routinely with hematoxylin and eosin for histopathological examination. This
study was conducted according to the Guidelines for Animal Experimentation, Biological
Research Laboratory, Nissan Chemical Corporation.
Histopathology of the Swim Bladder in the Normal and Wavy Medakas
The swim bladder in the normal medaka was located posterior and inferior to the head and
body kidney, respectively, in the dorsal abdominal cavity that was divided by the diaphragm
superior to the gastrointestinal tract. The shape of the swim bladders in sagittal section
was a lateral prolate spheroid shape (Fig. 1a). The wavy medakas exhibited a spinal curvature characterized by dorsoventrally
curved vertebrae, resulting in abnormal swimming patterns. The swim bladders in the wavy
medakas were located in the dorsal abdominal cavity, same as in the normal medaka; however,
they had a longitudinal oval shape in sagittal section (Fig. 1b). The gas gland and rete mirabile were located in similar positions in
both the normal and wavy medakas at the cranial pole of the swim bladder. The gas gland was
composed of three to four layers of pale eosinophilic vacuolated cuboidal epithelium (Fig. 1c and d) and was connected to the rete mirabile
that had parallely arranged blood capillaries (Fig.
1d).
Fig. 1.
Histopathology of the swim bladder in normal and wavy medakas. a) Loupe image of a
sagittal section in normal medaka. Lateral prolate spheroid-shaped swim bladder
located alongside the gas gland and rete mirabile (↑). HE stain. Bar = 4,000 µm. b)
Loupe image of a sagittal section in wavy medaka. Longitudinal oval-shaped swim
bladder (↑). HE stain. Bar = 4,000 µm. c) Low magnification of gas gland and rete
mirabile in wavy medaka. HE stain. Bar = 200 µm. d) High magnification of gas gland in
wavy medaka. HE stain. Bar = 50 µm. Di, diaphragm; GG, gas gland; Ki/b, body kidney;
Ki/h, head kidney; Li, liver; RM, rete mirabile; SB, swim bladder; Te, testis
Histopathology of the swim bladder in normal and wavy medakas. a) Loupe image of a
sagittal section in normal medaka. Lateral prolate spheroid-shaped swim bladder
located alongside the gas gland and rete mirabile (↑). HE stain. Bar = 4,000 µm. b)
Loupe image of a sagittal section in wavy medaka. Longitudinal oval-shaped swim
bladder (↑). HE stain. Bar = 4,000 µm. c) Low magnification of gas gland and rete
mirabile in wavy medaka. HE stain. Bar = 200 µm. d) High magnification of gas gland in
wavy medaka. HE stain. Bar = 50 µm. Di, diaphragm; GG, gas gland; Ki/b, body kidney;
Ki/h, head kidney; Li, liver; RM, rete mirabile; SB, swim bladder; Te, testis
Histopathology of Swim Bladder Tumors in the Wavy Medakas
The tumor of Fish No. 1 (male) was located posterior to the head kidney in the dorsal
abdominal cavity (Fig. 2a). The other tumors of Fish No. 2 and 3 (female) were located inferior to the body
kidney in the dorsal abdominal cavity and were connected to the rete mirabile (Fig. 3a and 4a). The rete mirabile of Fish No. 2 was slightly congested (Fig. 3b). In all three fish, the swim bladder lumen was not detected
in the region where it was originally assumed to be located, and that region was replaced
with adipose tissues (Fig. 2a, 3a and 4a). The
tumor masses in these tissues were non-invasive, expansile, and encapsulated solid masses of
proliferating tumor cells (Fig. 2b, 3b and 4b). No
infiltration of tumor cells into the rete mirabile had occurred (Fig. 3c and 4b). The tumor masses were composed of a homogenous
population of well-differentiated, densely packed, gas glandular epithelium-like cells. The
tumor cells were arranged in cords, trabeculae, and solid patterns, supported by capillaries
and minimal stroma. They exhibited various sizes and were of round to polygonal shape, with
distinct cell borders and pale eosinophilic vacuolated cytoplasm (Fig. 2c). Multinucleate cells and cytomegalic cells were also
scattered throughout. The nuclei exhibited anisonucleosis, with irregularly shaped and
unclear nucleoli, although no mitotic figures were detected within the tumor masses. A few
foci of adipocytes were scattered throughout the tumor (Fig. 4c). Based on these features, these tumors were diagnosed as adenomas originating from
the gas glandular epithelium of the swim bladder. Additionally, these tumor cells did not
seem to function as gas glandular epithelium, since the swim bladder lumen did not form in
these wavy medakas. With regards to histopathological lesions in other organs, there were
large blood cysts in kidney and multiple hepatic cysts with necrosis and inflammation in
Fish No.1, calcification in kidney and multiple hepatic cysts in Fish No. 2, and no lesions
in Fish No. 3.
Fig. 2.
Histopathology of gas gland adenoma in Fish No. 1. a) Loupe image of a sagittal
section. Tumor mass (↑). HE stain. Bar = 4,000 µm. b) Low magnification of gas gland
adenoma. HE stain. Bar = 200 µm. c) High magnification of tumor cells. HE stain. Bar =
60 µm. Di, diaphragm; Ki/h, head kidney; Li, liver; Te, testis.
Fig. 3.
Histopathology of gas gland adenoma in Fish No. 2. a) Loupe image of a sagittal
section. Tumor mass and rete mirabile (↑). HE stain. Bar = 4,000 µm. b) Low
magnification of gas gland adenoma and rete mirabile. HE stain. Bar = 200 µm. c)
Medium magnification of adenoma-rete mirabile junction. HE stain. Bar = 80 µm. Di,
diaphragm; Ki/b, body kidney; Ki/h, head kidney; Li, liver; Ov, ovary; RM, rete
mirabile.
Fig. 4.
Histopathology of gas gland adenoma in Fish No. 3. a) Loupe image of a sagittal
section. Tumor mass and rete mirabile (↑). HE stain. Bar = 4,000 µm. b) Low
magnification of gas gland adenoma. HE stain. Bar = 200 µm. c) High magnification of
tumor cells along with foci of adipocytes. HE stain. Bar = 40 µm. Di, diaphragm; Ki/h,
head kidney; Li, liver; Ov, ovary; RM, rete mirabile.
Histopathology of gas gland adenoma in Fish No. 1. a) Loupe image of a sagittal
section. Tumor mass (↑). HE stain. Bar = 4,000 µm. b) Low magnification of gas gland
adenoma. HE stain. Bar = 200 µm. c) High magnification of tumor cells. HE stain. Bar =
60 µm. Di, diaphragm; Ki/h, head kidney; Li, liver; Te, testis.Histopathology of gas gland adenoma in Fish No. 2. a) Loupe image of a sagittal
section. Tumor mass and rete mirabile (↑). HE stain. Bar = 4,000 µm. b) Low
magnification of gas gland adenoma and rete mirabile. HE stain. Bar = 200 µm. c)
Medium magnification of adenoma-rete mirabile junction. HE stain. Bar = 80 µm. Di,
diaphragm; Ki/b, body kidney; Ki/h, head kidney; Li, liver; Ov, ovary; RM, rete
mirabile.Histopathology of gas gland adenoma in Fish No. 3. a) Loupe image of a sagittal
section. Tumor mass and rete mirabile (↑). HE stain. Bar = 4,000 µm. b) Low
magnification of gas gland adenoma. HE stain. Bar = 200 µm. c) High magnification of
tumor cells along with foci of adipocytes. HE stain. Bar = 40 µm. Di, diaphragm; Ki/h,
head kidney; Li, liver; Ov, ovary; RM, rete mirabile.Swim bladder tumors can be induced in teleosts via exposure to environmental contaminants
and carcinogens[17], [18]. The chemical-induced swim bladder tumors are
reported in the medaka exposed to 4-chloroaniline[19], aniline[19],
N-methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG)[20], or bis (tri-n-butyltin)oxide[21]; in the guppy exposed to methyl mercury chloride[22]; and in the rainbow trout exposed to
diethylnitrosamine[17],
methylazoxymethanol acetate[17],
benz(a)pyrene[17], MNNG[17], N-methylnitrosourea,
dimethylbenz[a]anthracene[17], or
2,6-dimethylnltrosomorpholine[23].
Conversely, spontaneous swim bladder tumors are rare in teleosts, with an incidence of 0.02%
(2/10,000) in medakas than 24 weeks of age and 0.14% (7/5,000) in guppies older than 13
weeks of age, which have been used in the control groups of a variety of carcinogenesis
tests[11]. In contrast, juvenile fish
with skeletal deformations show a high prevalence of spontaneous proliferative changes in
the swim bladder, including tumors. Such abnormalities have been found in Atlantic cod with
notochord deformations[14] and
Sparus aurata with kypholordosis[24]. Therefore, it has been suggested that the swim bladder tumors either
induce severe skeletal deformations or are related to the genetic factors responsible for
such deformations. In the present cases, the incidence of spontaneous swim bladder tumors
was much higher at 10.7% (3/28) in the wavy medaka, compared with the normal variant. The
wavy medaka develops due to a vertebral abnormality that is determined by an autosomal
recessive gene (wavy; wy)[25] and is
characterized by wavy dorso-ventral curves in the vertebral column[26], [27]. There have been no reports of a relationship between the wavy gene and
swim bladder tumors. In the present study, the swim bladder deformation was observed in wavy
medakas, and this change was considered to be a secondary effect of the spinal curvature.
Thus, the long-term physical effects of swim bladder deformation on the gas gland may be an
important factor in the proliferation of the gas glandular epithelium in the wavy medaka,
resulting in a higher incidence of swim bladder tumors. Furthermore, histological
investigations of the gas glandular epithelium need to be conducted during the deformation
process of the swim bladder in the wavy medaka.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.