Literature DB >> 33627809

Angular momentum generation in nuclear fission.

J N Wilson1, D Thisse2, M Lebois2, N Jovančević2, D Gjestvang3, R Canavan4,5, M Rudigier4,6, D Étasse7, R-B Gerst8, L Gaudefroy9, E Adamska10, P Adsley2, A Algora11,12, M Babo2, K Belvedere4, J Benito13, G Benzoni14, A Blazhev8, A Boso5, S Bottoni14,15, M Bunce5, R Chakma2, N Cieplicka-Oryńczak16, S Courtin17, M L Cortés18, P Davies19, C Delafosse2, M Fallot20, B Fornal16, L Fraile13, A Gottardo21, V Guadilla20, G Häfner2,8, K Hauschild2, M Heine17, C Henrich6, I Homm6, F Ibrahim2, Ł W Iskra14,16, P Ivanov5, S Jazrawi4,5, A Korgul10, P Koseoglou6,22, T Kröll6, T Kurtukian-Nieto23, L Le Meur20, S Leoni14,15, J Ljungvall2, A Lopez-Martens2, R Lozeva2, I Matea2, K Miernik10, J Nemer2, S Oberstedt24, W Paulsen3, M Piersa10, Y Popovitch2, C Porzio14,15,25, L Qi2, D Ralet26, P H Regan4,5, K Rezynkina27, V Sánchez-Tembleque13, S Siem3, C Schmitt17, P-A Söderström6,28, C Sürder6, G Tocabens2, V Vedia13, D Verney2, N Warr8, B Wasilewska16, J Wiederhold6, M Yavahchova29, F Zeiser3, S Ziliani14,15.   

Abstract

When a heavy atomic nucleus splits (fission), the resulting fragments are observed to emerge spinning1; this phenomenon has been a mystery in nuclear physics for over 40 years2,3. The internal generation of typically six or seven units of angular momentum in each fragment is particularly puzzling for systems that start with zero, or almost zero, spin. There are currently no experimental observations that enable decisive discrimination between the many competing theories for the mechanism that generates the angular momentum4-12. Nevertheless, the consensus is that excitation of collective vibrational modes generates the intrinsic spin before the nucleus splits (pre-scission). Here we show that there is no significant correlation between the spins of the fragment partners, which leads us to conclude that angular momentum in fission is actually generated after the nucleus splits (post-scission). We present comprehensive data showing that the average spin is strongly mass-dependent, varying in saw-tooth distributions. We observe no notable dependence of fragment spin on the mass or charge of the partner nucleus, confirming the uncorrelated post-scission nature of the spin mechanism. To explain these observations, we propose that the collective motion of nucleons in the ruptured neck of the fissioning system generates two independent torques, analogous to the snapping of an elastic band. A parameterization based on occupation of angular momentum states according to statistical theory describes the full range of experimental data well. This insight into the role of spin in nuclear fission is not only important for the fundamental understanding and theoretical description of fission, but also has consequences for the γ-ray heating problem in nuclear reactors13,14, for the study of the structure of neutron-rich isotopes15,16, and for the synthesis and stability of super-heavy elements17,18.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33627809     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03304-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  4 in total

1.  New type of asymmetric fission in proton-rich nuclei.

Authors:  A N Andreyev; J Elseviers; M Huyse; P Van Duppen; S Antalic; A Barzakh; N Bree; T E Cocolios; V F Comas; J Diriken; D Fedorov; V Fedosseev; S Franchoo; J A Heredia; O Ivanov; U Köster; B A Marsh; K Nishio; R D Page; N Patronis; M Seliverstov; I Tsekhanovich; P Van den Bergh; J Van De Walle; M Venhart; S Vermote; M Veselsky; C Wagemans; T Ichikawa; A Iwamoto; P Möller; A J Sierk
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Anomalies in the Charge Yields of Fission Fragments from the ^{238}U(n,f) Reaction.

Authors:  J N Wilson; M Lebois; L Qi; P Amador-Celdran; D Bleuel; J A Briz; R Carroll; W Catford; H De Witte; D T Doherty; R Eloirdi; G Georgiev; A Gottardo; A Goasduff; K Hadyńska-Klęk; K Hauschild; H Hess; V Ingeberg; T Konstantinopoulos; J Ljungvall; A Lopez-Martens; G Lorusso; R Lozeva; R Lutter; P Marini; I Matea; T Materna; L Mathieu; A Oberstedt; S Oberstedt; S Panebianco; Zs Podolyák; A Porta; P H Regan; P Reiter; K Rezynkina; S J Rose; E Sahin; M Seidlitz; O Serot; R Shearman; B Siebeck; S Siem; A G Smith; G M Tveten; D Verney; N Warr; F Zeiser; M Zielinska
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  _{36}^{96}Kr_{60}-Low-Z Boundary of the Island of Deformation at N=60.

Authors:  J Dudouet; A Lemasson; G Duchêne; M Rejmund; E Clément; C Michelagnoli; F Didierjean; A Korichi; G Maquart; O Stezowski; C Lizarazo; R M Pérez-Vidal; C Andreoiu; G de Angelis; A Astier; C Delafosse; I Deloncle; Z Dombradi; G de France; A Gadea; A Gottardo; B Jacquot; P Jones; T Konstantinopoulos; I Kuti; F Le Blanc; S M Lenzi; G Li; R Lozeva; B Million; D R Napoli; A Navin; C M Petrache; N Pietralla; D Ralet; M Ramdhane; N Redon; C Schmitt; D Sohler; D Verney; D Barrientos; B Birkenbach; I Burrows; L Charles; J Collado; D M Cullen; P Désesquelles; C Domingo Pardo; V González; L Harkness-Brennan; H Hess; D S Judson; M Karolak; W Korten; M Labiche; J Ljungvall; R Menegazzo; D Mengoni; A Pullia; F Recchia; P Reiter; M D Salsac; E Sanchis; Ch Theisen; J J Valiente-Dobón; M Zielińska
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Nuclear fission: a review of experimental advances and phenomenology.

Authors:  A N Andreyev; K Nishio; K-H Schmidt
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2018-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.