Literature DB >> 33627182

Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring perceived maternal care quality in low- to high-income countries: a scoping review protocol.

Kyrah K Brown1, Godfred O Boateng2, Peace Ossom-Williamson3, Laura Haygood4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health practitioners and researchers must be able to measure and assess maternal care quality in facilities to monitor, intervene, and reduce global maternal mortality rates. On the global scale, there is a general lack of consensus on how maternal care quality is defined, conceptualized, and measured. Much of the literature addressing this problem has focused primarily on defining, conceptualizing, and measuring clinical indicators of maternal care quality. Less attention has been given in this regard to perceived maternal care quality among women which is known to influence care utilization and adherence. Therefore, there is a need to map the literature focused on defining, conceptualizing, and measuring perceived maternal care quality across low-, middle-, and high-income country contexts.
METHODS: This scoping review protocol will follow the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework. A comprehensive search strategy will be used to search for articles published from inception to 2020 in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, and WHO Global Index Medicus. Gray literature will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen articles by title and abstract, then by full-text based on pre-determined inclusion/exclusion criteria. A third reviewer will arbitrate any discrepancies. This protocol outlines a four-step analytic approach that includes numerical, graphical, tabular, and narrative summaries to provide a comprehensive description of the body of literature. DISCUSSION: The findings from this scoping review will provide a comprehensive overview of the existing evidence on perceived maternal care quality. The findings are expected to inform future work on building consensus around the definition and conceptualization of perceived maternal care quality, and lay the groundwork for future research aimed at developing measures of perceived maternal care quality that can be applied across country contexts. Consequently, this review may aid in facilitating coordinated efforts to measure and improve maternal care quality across diverse country contexts (i.e., low-, middle-, and high-income country contexts). REVIEW REGISTRATION: This scoping review has been registered in the Open Science Framework (osf.io/k8nqh).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Maternal mortality; Measurement; Quality of care; Scoping review

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33627182      PMCID: PMC7903867          DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01608-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Rev        ISSN: 2046-4053


  24 in total

1.  Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.

Authors:  Micah D J Peters; Casey Marnie; Andrea C Tricco; Danielle Pollock; Zachary Munn; Lyndsay Alexander; Patricia McInerney; Christina M Godfrey; Hanan Khalil
Journal:  JBI Evid Synth       Date:  2020-10

2.  Health care experiences of pregnant, birthing and postnatal women of color at risk for preterm birth.

Authors:  Monica R McLemore; Molly R Altman; Norlissa Cooper; Shanell Williams; Larry Rand; Linda Franck
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Measuring quality of care for all women and newborns: how do we know if we are doing it right? A review of facility assessment tools.

Authors:  Vanessa Brizuela; Hannah H Leslie; Jigyasa Sharma; Ana Langer; Özge Tunçalp
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 26.763

4.  Variability in Health Care Quality Measurement among Studies Using Service Provision Assessment Data from Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Corrina Moucheraud; Kaitlyn McBride
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.345

5.  Systematic reviews with language restrictions and no author contact have lower overall credibility: a methodology study.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Juan P Brito; Apostolos Tsapas; Marcio L Griebeler; Fares Alahdab; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 4.790

6.  Measuring quality-of-care in the context of sustainable development goal 3: a call for papers.

Authors:  Yoko Akachi; Finn Tarp; Edward Kelley; Tony Addisona; Margaret E Kruk
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  How many lives are at stake? Assessing 2030 sustainable development goal trajectories for maternal and child health.

Authors:  John W McArthur; Krista Rasmussen; Gavin Yamey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-02-15

8.  Measuring the quality of maternal and care processes at the time of delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: development and validation of a short index.

Authors:  Vandana Tripathi; Cynthia Stanton; Donna Strobino; Linda Bartlett
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Indicators for monitoring maternal and neonatal quality care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pedro J Saturno-Hernández; Ismael Martínez-Nicolás; Estephania Moreno-Zegbe; María Fernández-Elorriaga; Ofelia Poblano-Verástegui
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  What is meant by validity in maternal and newborn health measurement? A conceptual framework for understanding indicator validation.

Authors:  Lenka Benova; Ann-Beth Moller; Kathleen Hill; Lara M E Vaz; Alison Morgan; Claudia Hanson; Katherine Semrau; Shams Al Arifeen; Allisyn C Moran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Research designs and instruments to detect physiotherapy overuse of low-value care services in low back pain management: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Lukas Kühn; Lara Lindert; Kyung-Eun Choi
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-10-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.