Literature DB >> 33626633

Curriculum Changes and Trends 2010-2020: A Focused National Review Using the AAMC Curriculum Inventory and the LCME Annual Medical School Questionnaire Part II.

Angela D Blood1, Jeanne M Farnan, Walter Fitz-William.   

Abstract

Medical school curricula have evolved from 2010 to 2020. Numerous pressures and influences affect medical school curricula, including those from external sources, academic medical institutions, clinical teaching faculty, and undergraduate medical students. Using data from the AAMC Curriculum Inventory and the LCME Annual Medical School Questionnaire Part II, the nature of curriculum change is illuminated. Most medical schools are undertaking curriculum change, both in small cycles of continuous quality improvement and through significant change to curricular structure and content. Four topic areas are explored: cost consciousness, guns and firearms, nutrition, and opioids and addiction medicine. The authors examine how these topic areas are taught and assessed, where in the curriculum they are located, and how much time is dedicated to them in relation to the curriculum as a whole. When examining instructional methods overall, notable findings include (1) the decrease of lecture, although lecture remains the most used instructional method, (2) the increase of collaborative instructional methods, (3) the decrease of laboratory, and (4) the prevalence of clinical instructional methods in academic levels 3 and 4. Regarding assessment methods overall, notable findings include (1) the recent change of the USMLE Step 1 examination to a pass/fail reporting system, (2) a modest increase in narrative assessment, (3) the decline of practical labs, and (4) the predominance of institutionally developed written/computer-based examinations and participation. Among instructional and assessment methods, the most used methods tend to cluster by academic level. It is critical that faculty development evolves alongside curricula. Continued diversity in the use of instructional and assessment methods is necessary to adequately prepare tomorrow's physicians. Future research into the life cycle of a curriculum, as well optional curriculum content, is warranted.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33626633     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  2 in total

1.  Pilot Study: Increasing Confidence in Obstetrics and Gynecology Applicants Through a Prep Course Prior to Audition Rotations.

Authors:  Danielle Wright; Jessica Bailer; Amanda Hall; Halle Lindsey; Brelahn Wyatt
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-08

2.  "Flipped" clinical rotations: A novel approach.

Authors:  Wei Xiong; Simran Singh; Amy Wilson-Delfosse; Robert Jones; Craig Nielsen; Carol Chalkley; Lia Logio
Journal:  Clin Teach       Date:  2022-08-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.