Literature DB >> 33626133

Muscle activation in specific regions of the trapezius during modified Kendall manual muscle tests.

Zachariah J Henderson1, Sarah Bohunicky2, Josee A Rochon2, Mark Dacanay2, Trisha D Scribbans2.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Manual muscle tests (MMTs) are often used when assessing shoulder pathologies. For the trapezius, individual MMTs are used to selectively test the upper (UTR), middle (MTR), and lower (LTR) trapezius regions. It is assumed that MMTs for each region preferentially recruit the corresponding muscle fibres and produce a "maximal" contraction; however, it is unknown if this is true.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) for the upper (UT-MVIC), middle (MT-MVIC), and lower (LT-MVIC) trapezius, adapted from the Kendall MMTs, recruit the corresponding trapezius regions.
DESIGN: Cross-Over.
SETTING: Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 20 young, healthy individuals. INTERVENTION: Participants performed three repetitions of each MVIC. High density surface electromyography was collected from the UTR, MTR, and LTR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Root mean square (excitation) of the UTR, MTR, and LTR. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Three, one-way repeated measures ANOVAs.
RESULTS: UTR excitation: There was a significant increase in UTR excitation during the LT-MVIC compared to the UT-MVIC (p = .016), and MT-MVIC (p < .001). MTR excitation: There was a significant increase in MTR excitation during the MT-MVIC compared to the UT-MVIC (p = .001), and a significant increase in MTR excitation during the LT-MVIC compared to the UT-MVIC (p < .001). There was also a significant increase in MTR excitation during the LT-MVIC compared to the MT-MVIC (p < .001). LTR excitation: There was a significant increase in LTR excitation during the MT-MVIC (p < .001) and LT-MVIC (p < .001) compared to the UT-MVIC.
CONCLUSIONS: The UT-MVIC and MT-MVIC do not necessarily recruit the corresponding trapezius regions more than the other MVICs. Rather, the LT-MVIC appears to produce the greatest excitation in all trapezius regions. Additional research is needed; however, clinicians should be aware that maximal contractions may not always recruit the desired musculature when forming a clinical interpretation. © by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HD-sEMG; back assessment; muscle recruitment; musculoskeletal assessment; neck assessment; shoulder assessment

Year:  2021        PMID: 33626133      PMCID: PMC8530421          DOI: 10.4085/545-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   3.824


  16 in total

1.  Surface electromyographic analysis of exercises for the trapezius and serratus anterior muscles.

Authors:  Richard A Ekstrom; Robert A Donatelli; Gary L Soderberg
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  A narrative review of manual muscle testing and implications for muscle testing research.

Authors:  Katharine M Conable; Anthony L Rosner
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2011-08-09

3.  Standard maximum isometric voluntary contraction tests for normalizing shoulder muscle EMG.

Authors:  Craig E Boettcher; Karen A Ginn; Ian Cathers
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  A new manual muscle test for assessing the entire trapezius muscle.

Authors:  Michael T Cibulka; Dana Weissenborn; Megan Donham; Hayley Rammacher; Patrick Cuppy; Sandy A Ross
Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Uneven spatial distribution of surface EMG: what does it mean?

Authors:  Alessio Gallina; Roberto Merletti; Marco Gazzoni
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Clinical implications of scapular dyskinesis in shoulder injury: the 2013 consensus statement from the 'Scapular Summit'.

Authors:  W Ben Kibler; Paula M Ludewig; Phil W McClure; Lori A Michener; Klaus Bak; Aaron D Sciascia
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 7.  Rehabilitation of scapular dyskinesis: from the office worker to the elite overhead athlete.

Authors:  Ann M J Cools; Filip Struyf; Kristof De Mey; Annelies Maenhout; Birgit Castelein; Barbara Cagnie
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Infraspinatus strength assessment before and after scapular muscles rehabilitation in professional volleyball players with scapular dyskinesis.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Elisa De Santis; John W Sperling; Fabrizio Campi; Paolo Paladini; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Visual scapular dyskinesis: kinematics and muscle activity alterations in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Andrea Diniz Lopes; Mark K Timmons; Molly Grover; Rozana Mesquita Ciconelli; Lori A Michener
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Electromyographic activity and applied load during shoulder rehabilitation exercises using elastic resistance.

Authors:  R A Hintermeister; G W Lange; J M Schultheis; M J Bey; R J Hawkins
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.