Literature DB >> 33626066

Who is (not) complying with the U. S. social distancing directive and why? Testing a general framework of compliance with virtual measures of social distancing.

Russell H Fazio1, Benjamin C Ruisch2, Courtney A Moore1, Javier A Granados Samayoa1, Shelby T Boggs1, Jesse T Ladanyi1.   

Abstract

A study involving over 2000 online participants (US residents) tested a general framework regarding compliance with a directive in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The study featured not only a self-report measure of social distancing but also virtual behavior measures-simulations that presented participants with graphical depictions mirroring multiple real-world scenarios and asked them to position themselves in relation to others in the scene. The conceptual framework highlights three essential components of a directive: (1) the source, some entity is advocating for a behavioral change; (2) the surrounding context, the directive is in response to some challenge; and (3) the target, the persons to whom the directive is addressed. Belief systems relevant to each of these three components are predicted, and were found, to relate to compliance with the social distancing directive. The implications of the findings for public service campaigns encouraging people to engage in social distancing are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33626066     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  9 in total

1.  Social distancing decreases an individual's likelihood of contracting COVID-19.

Authors:  Russell H Fazio; Benjamin C Ruisch; Courtney A Moore; Javier A Granados Samayoa; Shelby T Boggs; Jesse T Ladanyi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Heterogeneous adaptive behavioral responses may increase epidemic burden.

Authors:  Baltazar Espinoza; Samarth Swarup; Christopher L Barrett; Madhav Marathe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Correlation of Population Factors, Compliance with Masking and Social Distance, Vaccination, and COVID-19 Infection in Central Appalachia.

Authors:  J Suzanne Moore; Hibah Virk; Jeffrey A Summers
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 0.810

4.  Metacognitive Labeling of Contentious Claims: Facts, Opinions, and Conspiracy Theories.

Authors:  Robert Brotherton; Lisa K Son
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-25

5.  Involvement of political and socio-economic factors in the spatial and temporal dynamics of COVID-19 outcomes in Brazil: A population-based study.

Authors:  Diego Ricardo Xavier; Eliane Lima E Silva; Flávio Alves Lara; Gabriel R R E Silva; Marcus F Oliveira; Helen Gurgel; Christovam Barcellos
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Am       Date:  2022-03-14

6.  Scientists, presidents, and pandemics-comparing the science-politics nexus during the Zika virus and COVID-19 outbreaks.

Authors:  Thomas G Safford; Emily H Whitmore; Lawrence C Hamilton
Journal:  Soc Sci Q       Date:  2021-10-29

7.  Political ideology and pandemic lifestyles: the indirect effects of empathy, authoritarianism, and threat.

Authors:  Terrence D Hill; Ginny Garcia-Alexander; Andrew P Davis; Eric T Bjorklund; Luis A Vila-Henninger; William C Cockerham
Journal:  Discov Soc Sci Health       Date:  2022-08-24

8.  Examining the Left-Right Divide Through the Lens of a Global Crisis: Ideological Differences and Their Implications for Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Benjamin Coe Ruisch; Courtney Moore; Javier Granados Samayoa; Shelby Boggs; Jesse Ladanyi; Russell Fazio
Journal:  Polit Psychol       Date:  2021-05-05

9.  Testing persuasive messaging to encourage COVID-19 risk reduction.

Authors:  Scott E Bokemper; Gregory A Huber; Erin K James; Alan S Gerber; Saad B Omer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.