| Literature DB >> 33625525 |
Shabana Akhtar1,2, Diana Anderson3, Talha Muhammad Azam4, Arif Malik4.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33625525 PMCID: PMC8113169 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-021-03010-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Toxicol ISSN: 0340-5761 Impact factor: 5.153
Fig. 1Effect of PhIP on GSH levels and GSH/GSSG ratios and modulation of PhIP-induced oxidative stress by MYR B and MYR N in healthy lymphocytes. Cells lysed to the concentration of 1 × 105 cells/ml. Various treatment groups included the NC (negative control untreated), PhIP (100 µM) as a positive control (PC), MYR B (10 µM) + PhIP and MYR N (20 µM) + PhIP. PC was compared against the NC, however, other two treatment groups MYR B + PhIP and MYR N + PhIP were compared against the PC. (*) show the difference between the compared groups. *p < 0.01; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
Fig. 2Modulating effects of myricetin bulk (MYR B) and nano (MYR N) on PhIP-triggered alterations in protein expression of P53 and Bcl-2 in healthy lymphocytes (a) Immunoblot analysis of the p53, and bcl-2 proteins in lymphocyte from healthy individuals treated with PhIP (100 µM), MYR B (10 µM) with PhIP and MYR N (20 µM) supplemented with PhIP. P53 and Bcl-2 expression was decreased after PhIP treatment. Supplementation of MYR B and MYR N significantly increased the expression levels of both proteins compared to PhIP alone treated group. GAPDH was used as an internal control protein to normalise the data. b Bar graphs exhibiting fold changes in protein expression levels. Data were represented as the mean ± SE of three experiments. ***P < 0.0001