Literature DB >> 33625510

Economic Analysis of Mobile Integrated Health Care Delivered by Emergency Medical Services Paramedic Teams.

Feng Xie1,2, Jiajun Yan1, Gina Agarwal1,3, Richard Ferron4.   

Abstract

Importance: Mobile integrated health care (MIH) is a new model of community-based health care to provide on-site urgent or nonurgent care. Niagara emergency medical services (NEMS) started MIH in 2018 to serve the Niagara region of Ontario, Canada. However, its economic impact is unknown. Objective: To compare time on task and cost between MIH and ambulance delivered by NEMS from a public payer's perspective. Design, Setting, and Participants: This economic evaluation was an analysis of the NEMS databases regarding responses to emergency calls by the NEMS from 2016 to 2019. Emergency calls serviced by MIH in 2018 to 2019 were used as an intervention cohort. Propensity score matching was used to identify a 1:1 matched cohort of calls serviced by regular ambulance response for the same period and 2 years prior. Statistical analyses were performed from January to April 2020. Exposures: MIH compared with matched ambulance services. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were the time on task (including time on scene and time at hospital) and costs. Costs were calculated in 2019 Canadian dollars using cost per minute and compared with the 3 ambulance cohorts.
Results: In 2018 to 2019, there were 1740 calls serviced by MIH for which a matched ambulance cohort was identified for the same period and 2 years prior. The mean (SD) time on task was 72.7 (51.0) minutes for MIH, compared with 84.1 (52.0) minutes, 84.3 (54.1) minutes, and 79.4 (42.0) minutes for matched ambulance in 2018 to 2019, 2017 to 2018, and 2016 to 2017, respectively. Of calls serviced by MIH, 498 (28.6%) required ED transport (ie, after MIH team assessment, transport to ED was deemed to be necessary or demanded by the patient), compared with 1300 (74.7%) calls serviced by ambulance in 2018 to 2019, 1294 (74.4%) in 2017 to 2018, and 1359 (78.1%) in 2016 to 2017. The mean (SD) total cost per 1000 calls was $122 760 ($78 635) for MIH compared with $294 336 ($97 245), $299 797 ($104 456), and $297 269 ($81 144) for regular ambulance responses in the 3 matched cohorts, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with regular ambulance response, MIH was associated with a substantial reduction in the proportion of patients transported to the ED, leading to a substantial saving in total costs. This finding suggests that the MIH model is a promising and viable solution to meeting urgent health care needs in the community, while substantially improving the use of scarce health care resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33625510      PMCID: PMC7905495          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


  11 in total

1.  The Epidemiology of Prehospital Emergency Responses for Older Adults in a Provincial EMS System.

Authors:  Judah Goldstein; Jan L Jensen; Alix J E Carter; Andrew H Travers; Kenneth Rockwood
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.410

2.  Can Mobile Integrated Health Care Paramedics Safely Conduct Medical Clearance of Behavioral Health Patients in a Pilot Project? A Report of the First 1000 Consecutive Encounters.

Authors:  Kevin E Mackey; Chichen Qiu
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.077

3.  Mobile integrated healthcare.

Authors:  A J Heightman
Journal:  JEMS       Date:  2014-07

4.  Providing Acute Care at Home: Community Paramedics Enhance an Advanced Illness Management Program-Preliminary Data.

Authors:  Karen A Abrashkin; Jonathan Washko; Jenny Zhang; Asantewaa Poku; Hyun Kim; Kristofer L Smith
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  CIHI Survey: ED spending in Canada: a focus on the cost of patients waiting for access to an in-patient bed in Ontario.

Authors:  Heather Dawson; Greg Zinck
Journal:  Healthc Q       Date:  2009

6.  Giving EMS flexibility in transporting low-acuity patients could generate substantial Medicare savings.

Authors:  Abby Alpert; Kristy G Morganti; Gregg S Margolis; Jeffrey Wasserman; Arthur L Kellermann
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Social factors in frequent callers: a description of isolation, poverty and quality of life in those calling emergency medical services frequently.

Authors:  Gina Agarwal; Janice Lee; Brent McLeod; Sabnam Mahmuda; Michelle Howard; Krista Cockrell; Ricardo Angeles
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  A cross-sectional study of the self-report of stress among emergency department patients.

Authors:  Ted D Nirenberg; Janette Baird; Magdalena Harrington; Michael J Mello; Robert Woolard; Richard Longabaugh
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2009-09

10.  Mobile Integrated Healthcare Intervention and Impact Analysis with a Medicare Advantage Population.

Authors:  Brooke Roeper; Jonathan Mocko; Lanty M O'Connor; Jiaquan Zhou; Daniel Castillo; Eric H Beck
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.459

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.