Literature DB >> 33625363

A Novel User Utility Score for Diabetes Management Using Tailored Mobile Coaching: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Min-Kyung Lee1, Da Young Lee2, Hong-Yup Ahn3, Cheol-Young Park4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mobile health applications have been developed to support diabetes self-management, but their effectiveness could depend on patient engagement. Therefore, patient engagement must be examined through multifactorial tailored behavioral interventions from an individual perspective.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the usefulness of a novel user utility score (UUS) as a tool to measure patient engagement by using a mobile health application for diabetes management.
METHODS: We conducted a subanalysis of results from a 12-month randomized controlled trial of a tailored mobile coaching (TMC) system among insurance policyholders with type 2 diabetes. UUS was calculated as the sum of the scores for 4 major core components (range 0-8): frequency of self-monitoring blood glucose testing, dietary and exercise records, and message reading rate. We explored the association between UUS for the first 3 months and glycemic control over 12 months. In addition, we investigated the relationship of UUS with blood pressure, lipid profile, and self-report scales assessing diabetes self-management.
RESULTS: We divided 72 participants into 2 groups based on UUS for the first 3 months: UUS:0-4 (n=38) and UUS:5-8 (n=34). There was a significant between-group difference in glycated hemoglobin test (HbA1c) levels for the 12-months study period (P=.011). The HbA1c decrement at 12 months in the UUS:5-8 group was greater than that of the UUS:0-4 group [-0.92 (SD 1.24%) vs -0.33 (SD 0.80%); P=.049]. After adjusting for confounding factors, UUS was significantly associated with changes in HbA1c at 3, 6, and 12 months; the regression coefficients were -0.113 (SD 0.040; P=.006), -0.143 (SD 0.045; P=.002), and -0.136 (SD 0.052; P=.011), respectively. Change differences in other health outcomes between the 2 groups were not observed throughout a 12-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: UUS as a measure of patient engagement was associated with changes in HbA1c over the study period of the TMC system and could be used to predict improved glycemic control in diabetes self-management through mobile health interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT03033407; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03033407. ©Min-Kyung Lee, Da Young Lee, Hong-Yup Ahn, Cheol-Young Park. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 24.02.2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diabetes management; mobile applications; patient engagement; type 2 diabetes

Year:  2021        PMID: 33625363      PMCID: PMC7946585          DOI: 10.2196/17573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth        ISSN: 2291-5222            Impact factor:   4.773


  43 in total

1.  Effect of aerobic exercise training on serum levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Satoru Kodama; Shiro Tanaka; Kazumi Saito; Miao Shu; Yasuko Sone; Fumiko Onitake; Emiko Suzuki; Hitoshi Shimano; Shigeru Yamamoto; Kazuo Kondo; Yasuo Ohashi; Nobuhiro Yamada; Hirohito Sone
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-28

2.  Ensuring the best care for our increasing aging population: health engagement and positive technology can help patients achieve a more active role in future healthcare.

Authors:  Brenda K Wiederhold; Giuseppe Riva; Guendalina Graffigna
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw       Date:  2013-06

3.  A Korean version of the Appraisal of Diabetes Scale (ADS-K): psychometric evaluation with a population of Koreans with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Eun-Hyun Lee; Young Whee Lee; Kwan-Woo Lee; Moonsuk Nam; Yong Seong Kim; Seung Jin Han
Journal:  J Transcult Nurs       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 1.959

4.  Effect of lifestyle intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liang Chen; Jian-Hao Pei; Jian Kuang; Hong-Mei Chen; Zhong Chen; Zhong-Wen Li; Hua-Zhang Yang
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 8.694

Review 5.  The Effect of Using Mobile Technology-Based Methods That Record Food or Nutrient Intake on Diabetes Control and Nutrition Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Judi Porter; Catherine E Huggins; Helen Truby; Jorja Collins
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Projection of Diabetes Prevalence in Korean Adults for the Year 2030 Using Risk Factors Identified from National Data.

Authors:  Inkyung Baik
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 5.376

Review 7.  What Is the Role of Resistance Exercise in Improving the Cardiometabolic Health of Adolescents with Obesity?

Authors:  SoJung Lee; YoonMyung Kim; Jennifer L Kuk
Journal:  J Obes Metab Syndr       Date:  2019-06-30

Review 8.  The prevention and control the type-2 diabetes by changing lifestyle and dietary pattern.

Authors:  Mohammad Asif
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2014-02-21

9.  How to engage type-2 diabetic patients in their own health management: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Guendalina Graffigna; Serena Barello; Chiara Libreri; Claudio A Bosio
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Patient engagement in type 2 diabetes mellitus research: what patients want.

Authors:  Kristina F Simacek; Tanya Nelson; Mignon Miller-Baldi; Susan C Bolge
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.711

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2022. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Authors:  Melanie J Davies; Vanita R Aroda; Billy S Collins; Robert A Gabbay; Jennifer Green; Nisa M Maruthur; Sylvia E Rosas; Stefano Del Prato; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Tsvetalina Tankova; Apostolos Tsapas; John B Buse
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 10.460

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.