Literature DB >> 33624884

Decline in cancer pathology notifications during the 2020 COVID-19-related restrictions in Victoria.

Luc Te Marvelde1, Rory Wolfe2, Grant McArthur3, Louis A Blake1, Sue M Evans1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Cancer; Epidemiology; Infectious diseases; Pathology services; Respiratory tract infections

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33624884      PMCID: PMC8014106          DOI: 10.5694/mja2.50968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


× No keyword cloud information.
Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) data indicated that there were 37% fewer screening procedures for breast cancers and 55% fewer for colorectal cancers in April than in March 2020. We examined the temporal relationship between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)‐related restrictions in Victoria during 1 April – 15 October 2020 and cancer pathology notifications to the Victorian Cancer Registry (VCR), to estimate their impact on cancer diagnoses. Victorian legislation requires pathology services to notify reportable cancer diagnoses to the VCR. The E‐Path system, installed in all Victorian pathology services during 2013–2018, automatically transmits notifications to the VCR together with pathologist report authorisations. During 2019, 97 313 of 104 025 cancer pathology notifications to the VCR (94%) were received via E‐Path (data supplied by author LB). Changes to the E‐Path system during 2019 meant that we were unable to directly compare notification numbers for 2019 and 2020. We therefore modelled cancer incidence during 2014–2018 by Poisson regression. A spline function was fitted to VCR cancer incidence data for weeks 1–52, adjusted for day type (working or non‐working day/public holiday) and year, and the fitted curve used to predict daily incidence during 7 January – 15 October 2020. Predicted incidence was re‐scaled to estimate expected notification numbers; the scale factor was the number of notifications during the baseline period — 1 February – 16 March 2020, allowing a two‐week washout period before restrictions were formally announced — divided by the predicted incidence during this period. Observed and predicted notification numbers were compared using Poisson regression, with the expected number as an offset term, enabling estimation of relative reductions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Differences between predicted and actual notification numbers were estimated, both overall and for specific groups (eg, by tumour or age group), based on the pertinent incidence data. As a single cancer diagnosis can be associated with several pathology notifications, the number of undiagnosed cancers was estimated by multiplying the difference in notification numbers by the ratio of newly diagnosed tumours to pathology notifications in 2018 (Supporting Information, table 1). The confidence interval for the number of undiagnosed cases was based on the Poisson model, keeping the ratio of newly diagnosed tumours to pathology notifications constant. In sensitivity analyses, data were fitted to polynomial models, different baseline periods were used, or data were restricted to reportable cancer diagnoses. The study was exempted from formal ethics review by the human research ethics committee of Cancer Council Victoria. During 1 April – 15 October 2020, there were 5446 fewer notifications of new cancer diagnoses than predicted by our primary model (predicted, 54 609 v observed, 49 163; relative reduction, –10.0%; 95% CI, –10.8% to –9.2%) (Supporting Information, figure 1); we estimated that there were 2530 undiagnosed cancers (95% CI, 2327–2731). The relative reduction was greatest during 1 April – 4 May 2020 (Box 1). By tumour group, the relative reductions were most marked for prostate cancer, head and neck tumours, melanoma, and breast cancer; they were greater for men, people aged 50 years or more, and for people in areas of higher socio‐economic position (Box 2). The pattern of difference in notifications varied between tumour groups (Supporting Information, figure 2). LOESS = locally estimated scatterplot smoothing. The grey area marks the baseline period, the vertical dotted lines the analysis period for predicted notifications. A state of emergency was declared in Victoria on 16 March 2020. Stage 3 movement restrictions were applied from 30 March, eased on 13 May, and re‐applied from 8 July. The state of emergency was renewed on 2 August, together with application of stage 4 restrictions to metropolitan Melbourne until their easing from 19 October. For further details, see the footnote to figure 2 in the online Supporting Information. Notifications Relative difference (95% CI) Absolute difference (a) Tumour to notification ratio (b) Estimated number of undiagnosed tumours (a*b) Characteristic Predicted Observed All notifications 54 609 49 163 –10.0% (–10.8% to –9.2%) –5446 0.465 2530 Sex Males 15 458 14 190 –8.2% (–9.7% to –6.7%) –1268 0.427 541 Females 10 408 10 367 –0.4% (–2.3% to 1.5%) –41 0.434 18 Age at diagnosis (years) < 50 9981 9674 –3.1% (–5.0% to –1.1%) –307 0.454 139 50–74 30 949 27 555 –11.0% (–12.0% to –9.9%) –3394 0.447 1516 ≥ 75 13 697 11 934 –12.9% (–14.4% to –11.3%) –1763 0.514 906 Tumour group Breast 7923 7130 –10.0% (–12.1% to –7.9%) –793 0.380 301 Colorectal 5063 4838 –4.4% (–7.1% to –1.7%) –225 0.501 113 Haematologic 10 011 9321 –6.9% (–8.8% to –5.0%) –690 0.234 162 Melanoma 7168 6217 –13.3% (–15.4% to –11.1%) –951 0.538 511 Lung 2967 3062 3.2% (–0.4% to 6.9%) 95 0.483 –46 Head and neck 1363 1155 –15.3% (–20.0% to –10.3%) –208 0.504 105 Bladder 2159 2009 –6.9% (–10.9% to –2.8%) –150 0.370 56 Prostate 6417 4770 –25.7% (–27.8% to –23.5%) –1647 0.560 922 All other 11 931 10 661 –10.6% (–12.3% to –8.9%) –1270 0.546 693 Socio‐economic position (quintile) 1 (most disadvantaged) 10 334 9789 –5.3% (–7.1% to –3.4%) –545 0.453 247 2 10 378 9447 –9.0% (–10.8% to –7.1%) –931 0.456 425 3 10 192 9624 –5.6% (–7.4% to –3.7%) –568 0.488 277 4 10 925 9463 –13.4% (–15.1% to –11.6%) –1462 0.455 665 5 (least disadvantaged) 11 385 9714 –14.7% (–16.4% to –13.0%) –1671 0.460 769 Remoteness Major cities 37 506 33 753 –10.0% (–11.0% to –9.0%) –3753 0.461 1731 Inner regional 13 414 12 031 –10.3% (–11.9% to –8.7%) –1383 0.472 652 Outer regional/remote 2553 2457 –3.8% (–7.5% to 0.1%) –96 0.472 45 CI = confidence interval. Poisson regression (spline function, adjusted for day type [working day or non‐working day/public holiday] and year; baseline period: 1 February – 16 March 2020). For cancers common in both sexes (melanoma, colorectal cancer, lung, head and neck cancers, haematological malignancies). Based on residential address, using the Google Geocoding API (https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/geocoding/overview), spatially joined to Australian Bureau of Statistics Statistical Area 1 (SA1) polygons. Area‐based socio‐economic quintiles were based on 2016 Australian Bureau of Statistics census data. Accessibility and Remoteness Index of Australia. The 6.5‐month period of COVID‐19‐related restrictions in Victoria was accompanied by a 10% reduction in cancer pathology notifications; we estimated that about 2530 cancer diagnoses were either delayed or missed. The impact of delayed diagnosis is greatest for patients with aggressive cancers. Changes in care delivery during the restrictions, including suspension of screening services and outpatient clinics and postponed surveillance of existing cancers, may have affected notification numbers for some tumour groups and consequently the estimated number of delayed diagnoses. Planning for a possible surge in cancer diagnoses over the coming 6–12 months, and media campaigns encouraging people to not further delay seeking medical attention, may ameliorate any negative impact of delayed cancer diagnosis.

Competing interests

No relevant disclosures. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file.

Notifications

Relative difference (95% CI)

Absolute difference

(a)

Tumour to notification ratio

(b)

Estimated number of undiagnosed tumours (a*b)

Characteristic

Predicted

Observed

All notifications

54 609

49 163

–10.0% (–10.8% to –9.2%)

–5446

0.465

2530

Sex

Males

15 458

14 190

–8.2% (–9.7% to –6.7%)

–1268

0.427

541

Females

10 408

10 367

–0.4% (–2.3% to 1.5%)

–41

0.434

18

Age at diagnosis (years)

< 50

9981

9674

–3.1% (–5.0% to –1.1%)

–307

0.454

139

50–74

30 949

27 555

–11.0% (–12.0% to –9.9%)

–3394

0.447

1516

≥ 75

13 697

11 934

–12.9% (–14.4% to –11.3%)

–1763

0.514

906

Tumour group

Breast

7923

7130

–10.0% (–12.1% to –7.9%)

–793

0.380

301

Colorectal

5063

4838

–4.4% (–7.1% to –1.7%)

–225

0.501

113

Haematologic

10 011

9321

–6.9% (–8.8% to –5.0%)

–690

0.234

162

Melanoma

7168

6217

–13.3% (–15.4% to –11.1%)

–951

0.538

511

Lung

2967

3062

3.2% (–0.4% to 6.9%)

95

0.483

–46

Head and neck

1363

1155

–15.3% (–20.0% to –10.3%)

–208

0.504

105

Bladder

2159

2009

–6.9% (–10.9% to –2.8%)

–150

0.370

56

Prostate

6417

4770

–25.7% (–27.8% to –23.5%)

–1647

0.560

922

All other

11 931

10 661

–10.6% (–12.3% to –8.9%)

–1270

0.546

693

Socio‐economic position (quintile)

1 (most disadvantaged)

10 334

9789

–5.3% (–7.1% to –3.4%)

–545

0.453

247

2

10 378

9447

–9.0% (–10.8% to –7.1%)

–931

0.456

425

3

10 192

9624

–5.6% (–7.4% to –3.7%)

–568

0.488

277

4

10 925

9463

–13.4% (–15.1% to –11.6%)

–1462

0.455

665

5 (least disadvantaged)

11 385

9714

–14.7% (–16.4% to –13.0%)

–1671

0.460

769

Remoteness

Major cities

37 506

33 753

–10.0% (–11.0% to –9.0%)

–3753

0.461

1731

Inner regional

13 414

12 031

–10.3% (–11.9% to –8.7%)

–1383

0.472

652

Outer regional/remote

2553

2457

–3.8% (–7.5% to 0.1%)

–96

0.472

45

CI = confidence interval.

Poisson regression (spline function, adjusted for day type [working day or non‐working day/public holiday] and year; baseline period: 1 February – 16 March 2020). 

For cancers common in both sexes (melanoma, colorectal cancer, lung, head and neck cancers, haematological malignancies).

Based on residential address, using the Google Geocoding API (https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/geocoding/overview), spatially joined to Australian Bureau of Statistics Statistical Area 1 (SA1) polygons. Area‐based socio‐economic quintiles were based on 2016 Australian Bureau of Statistics census data.

Accessibility and Remoteness Index of Australia.

  9 in total

1.  Skin checks and skin cancer diagnosis in Australian general practice before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2011-2020.

Authors:  J Roseleur; D A Gonzalez-Chica; J Emery; N P Stocks
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 11.113

2.  Comparison between melanoma diagnostic pathways and access to services for rural versus metropolitan patients during Victoria's COVID-19 lockdown.

Authors:  Katrina Tan; Yan Pan; Victoria Mar
Journal:  Australas J Dermatol       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 2.481

3.  The continuing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnosis and surgical prostate cancer management: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Nathan Papa; Matthew J Roberts; Marlon Perera
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 1.872

4.  Prompt Resumption of Screening Programme Reduced the Impact of COVID-19 on New Breast Cancer Diagnoses in Northern Italy.

Authors:  Lucia Mangone; Pamela Mancuso; Maria Barbara Braghiroli; Isabella Bisceglia; Cinzia Campari; Stefania Caroli; Massimiliano Marino; Adele Caldarella; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Carmine Pinto
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  COVID-19 unmasks the critical role of primary healthcare providers in the timely diagnosis of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  George Grigoriadis; Pasquale L Fedele; Adrian Chee; Michael S Y Low; Shahla Vilcassim
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.611

6.  Significant Decrease in Annual Cancer Diagnoses in Spain during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Real-Data Study.

Authors:  Sofía Ruiz-Medina; Silvia Gil; Begoña Jimenez; Pablo Rodriguez-Brazzarola; Tamara Diaz-Redondo; Mireya Cazorla; Marta Muñoz-Ayllon; Inmaculada Ramos; Carmen Reyna; María José Bermejo; Ana Godoy; Esperanza Torres; Manuel Cobo; Laura Galvez; Antonio Rueda; Emilio Alba; Nuria Ribelles
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Protocol for SARS-CoV-2 post-vaccine surveillance study in Australian adults and children with cancer: an observational study of safety and serological and immunological response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (SerOzNET).

Authors:  Amy Body; Elizabeth Ahern; Luxi Lal; Karen Gillett; Hesham Abdulla; Stephen Opat; Tracey O'Brien; Peter Downie; Stuart Turville; C Mee Ling Munier; Corey Smith; C Raina MacIntyre; Eva Segelov
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  The impact of treatment delay on skin cancer in COVID-19 era: a case-control study.

Authors:  Konstantinos Seretis; Eleni Boptsi; Anastasia Boptsi; Efstathios G Lykoudis
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Changes in systemic cancer therapy in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study.

Authors:  Monica Tang; Benjamin Daniels; Maria Aslam; Andrea Schaffer; Sallie-Anne Pearson
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2021-08-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.