Literature DB >> 33624126

Greater Focus on Strengths is Associated with Successful Discharge in Youth Public Mental Health Treatment.

Emilee H Turner1, Charles W Mueller2.   

Abstract

The positive psychology literature suggests focusing on strengths in mental health treatment improves well-being, reduces symptomology, and is linked to positive outcomes. However, there is little research on the use of strengths in treatment and their association with outcomes in youth clinical populations. The present study used multi-level modeling to examine the association between the proportional targeting of strengths and treatment outcomes for 1,841 youth ages 3-19 receiving intensive in-home services through a public mental health system. A greater percentage of targets endorsed during treatment that were strength-focused was associated with increased likelihood of successful treatment discharge, even after accounting for other predictors, including episode length, youth age, and level of impairment at treatment start. Specifically, as the percentage of strengths targeted increased from 46 to 64% of total targets endorsed, the odds of successful discharge increased by 21%. Such practice-based findings derived from aggregated data regarding services to multiethnic low-income families extend the strength-based intervention literature to include youth with significant life challenges. Study findings point to the need to develop structured interventions suitable for examination via clinical efficacy and effectiveness trials. Clinical practice, dissemination, implementation, and future research implications are discussed.

Keywords:  Positive psychology; Public mental health; Strengths; Treatment target; Usual care; Youth

Year:  2021        PMID: 33624126     DOI: 10.1007/s10488-021-01121-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health        ISSN: 0894-587X


  9 in total

1.  Systems of care as asset-building communities: implementing strengths-based planning and positive youth development.

Authors:  Susan L McCammon
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2012-06

2.  Treatment-as-usual therapy targets for comorbid youth disproportionately focus on externalizing problems.

Authors:  Matthew Milette-Winfree; Charles W Mueller
Journal:  Psychol Serv       Date:  2017-05-18

3.  Well-being therapy in school settings: a pilot study.

Authors:  Chiara Ruini; Carlotta Belaise; Chiara Brombin; Ernesto Caffo; Giovanni A Fava
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 17.659

Review 4.  Annual Research Review: Expanding mental health services through novel models of intervention delivery.

Authors:  Alan E Kazdin
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 8.982

5.  The compensation and capitalization models: a test of two approaches to individualizing the treatment of depression.

Authors:  Jennifer S Cheavens; Daniel R Strunk; Sophie A Lazarus; Lizabeth A Goldstein
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2012-08-13

6.  Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: a practice-friendly meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nancy L Sin; Sonja Lyubomirsky
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-05

7.  Strengths-based positive psychology interventions: a randomized placebo-controlled online trial on long-term effects for a signature strengths- vs. a lesser strengths-intervention.

Authors:  René T Proyer; Fabian Gander; Sara Wellenzohn; Willibald Ruch
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-22

8.  The effect of positive psychology interventions on well-being and distress in clinical samples with psychiatric or somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Farid Chakhssi; Jannis T Kraiss; Marion Sommers-Spijkerman; Ernst T Bohlmeijer
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 9.  Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  Linda Bolier; Merel Haverman; Gerben J Westerhof; Heleen Riper; Filip Smit; Ernst Bohlmeijer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.