Literature DB >> 33624071

Combined aerobic/resistance/inspiratory muscle training as the 'optimum' exercise programme for patients with chronic heart failure: ARISTOS-HF randomized clinical trial.

Ioannis D Laoutaris1, Ewa Piotrowicz2, Manolis S Kallistratos3, Athanasios Dritsas1, Niki Dimaki3, Dimitris Miliopoulos1, Maria Andriopoulou3, Athanasios J Manolis3, Maurizio Volterrani4, Massimo F Piepoli5, Andrew J S Coats4, Stamatis Adamopoulos1.   

Abstract

AIMS: An 'optimum' universally agreed exercise programme for heart failure (HF) patients has not been found. ARISTOS-HF randomized clinical trial evaluates whether combined aerobic training (AT)/resistance training (RT)/inspiratory muscle training (IMT) (ARIS) is superior to AT/RT, AT/IMT or AT in improving aerobic capacity, left ventricular dimensions, and secondary functional outcomes. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients of New York Heart Association II-III, left ventricular ejection fraction  ≤ 35% were randomized to an ARIS, AT/RT, AT/IMT, or AT group, exercising 3 times/week, 180 min/week for 12 weeks. Pre- and post-training, peakVO2 was evaluated with cardiopulmonary exercise testing, left ventricular dimensions using echocardiography, walking distance with the 6-min walk test (6MWT), quality of life by the Minnesota Living with HF Questionnaire (MLwHFQ), while a programme preference survey (PPS) was used. Seventy-four patients of [mean 95% (confidence interval, CI)] age 66.1 (64.3-67.9) years and peakVO2 17.3 (16.4-18.2) mL/kg/min were finally analysed. Between-group analysis showed a trend for increased peakVO2 (mL/kg/min) [mean contrasts (95% CI)] in the ARIS group [ARIS vs. AT/RT 1.71 (0.163-3.25)(.), vs. AT/IMT 1.50 (0.0152-2.99)(.), vs. AT 1.38 (-0.142 to 2.9)(.)], additional benefits in circulatory power (mL/kg/min⋅mmHg) [ARIS vs. AT/RT 376 (60.7-690)*, vs. AT/IMT 423 (121-725)*, vs. AT 345 (35.4-656)*], left ventricular end-systolic diameter (mm) [ARIS vs. AT/RT -2.11 (-3.65 to (-0.561))*, vs. AT -2.47 (-4.01 to (-0.929))**], 6MWT (m) [ARIS vs. AT/IMT 45.6 (18.3-72.9)**, vs. AT 55.2 (27.6-82.7)****], MLwHFQ [ARIS vs. AT/RT -7.79 (-11 to (-4.62))****, vs. AT -8.96 (-12.1 to (-5.84))****], and in PPS score [mean (95% CI)] [ARIS, 4.8 (4.7-5) vs. AT, 4.4 (4.2-4.7)*] [(.) P ≤ 0.1; *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001; ****P ≤ 0.0001].
CONCLUSION: ARISTOS-HF trial recommends exercise training for 180 min/week and supports the prescription of the ARIS training regime for HF patients (Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. ARISTOS-HF Clinical Trial number, NCT03013270). Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aerobic/Resistance/Inspiratory (ARIS) training; Exercise training; Heart failure; Rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33624071     DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol        ISSN: 2047-4873            Impact factor:   7.804


  2 in total

1.  Effects of Addition of Inspiratory Muscle Training to Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation on Inspiratory Muscle Strength, Peak Oxygen Consumption, and Selected Hemodynamics in Chronic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Ahmad Mahdi Ahmad; Mai Helmy Hassan
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.800

Review 2.  Current role and future perspectives of cardiac rehabilitation in coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Eduardo M Vilela; Ricardo Ladeiras-Lopes; Ana Joao; Joana Braga; Susana Torres; Sofia Viamonte; José Ribeiro; Madalena Teixeira; José P Nunes; Ricardo Fontes-Carvalho
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.