Zimo Chen1,2, Jinglin Mo1,2, Jie Xu1,2, Anxin Wang1,2, Liye Dai1,2, Aichun Cheng1,2, Gulbahram Yalkun1,2, Xia Meng1,2, Xingquan Zhao1,2, Hao Li1,2, Shouling Wu3, Yongjun Wang1,2. 1. Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing 100070, China. 2. China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, No.119 Nansihuanxilu, Fengtai District, Beijing 100070, China. 3. Department of Cardiology, Kailuan General Hospital, 57 Xin Hua East Rd, Tangshan 063000, China.
Abstract
AIM: This study aimed to demonstrate the impact of cumulative burden of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) on risk of cardiovascular events (CVEs). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 34 959 participants were enrolled who participated in the four surveys during 2006-2013. Cumulative CVRF burden was calculated as number of years (2006-2013) multiplied by the values of CVRFs including systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose (FBG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). The primary outcome was defined as the CVE during 2012-2017, including ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality. During 4.62 (±0.71) years follow-up on average, there were 2118 (6.06%) CVE, including 847 (2.42%) ischaemic stroke, 221 (0.63%) myocardial infarction, and 1185 (3.39%) all-cause mortality. Higher cumulative burden of individual CVRF was significantly associated with increased risk of outcomes, except for LDL-C for all-cause mortality, FBG for myocardial infarction, and hs-CRP for ischaemic stroke. In Cox proportional hazards model, compared with the group, of the lower quartile of integrated cumulative burden, the hazard ratio (95% confidence intervals) of the upper quartile was 2.45 (2.03-2.94) for CVE, 3.65 (2.68-4.96) for ischaemic stroke, 4.51 (2.19-9.27) for myocardial infarction, and 1.73 (1.36-2.21) for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the correlation between cumulative burden of CVRFs and cardiovascular risk, except for cumulative burden of hs-CRP and ischaemic stroke. Thus, our study suggests the necessity to extend the observation duration of CVRFs in order to elucidate the life-course cumulative effect. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIM: This study aimed to demonstrate the impact of cumulative burden of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) on risk of cardiovascular events (CVEs). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 34 959 participants were enrolled who participated in the four surveys during 2006-2013. Cumulative CVRF burden was calculated as number of years (2006-2013) multiplied by the values of CVRFs including systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose (FBG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). The primary outcome was defined as the CVE during 2012-2017, including ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality. During 4.62 (±0.71) years follow-up on average, there were 2118 (6.06%) CVE, including 847 (2.42%) ischaemic stroke, 221 (0.63%) myocardial infarction, and 1185 (3.39%) all-cause mortality. Higher cumulative burden of individual CVRF was significantly associated with increased risk of outcomes, except for LDL-C for all-cause mortality, FBG for myocardial infarction, and hs-CRP for ischaemic stroke. In Cox proportional hazards model, compared with the group, of the lower quartile of integrated cumulative burden, the hazard ratio (95% confidence intervals) of the upper quartile was 2.45 (2.03-2.94) for CVE, 3.65 (2.68-4.96) for ischaemic stroke, 4.51 (2.19-9.27) for myocardial infarction, and 1.73 (1.36-2.21) for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the correlation between cumulative burden of CVRFs and cardiovascular risk, except for cumulative burden of hs-CRP and ischaemic stroke. Thus, our study suggests the necessity to extend the observation duration of CVRFs in order to elucidate the life-course cumulative effect. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.