Amitkumar Bagdia1, Prateek Hegde1, Amit Janu2, Kavita Khirwal3, Ajay Puri1, Ashish Gulia1. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 2. Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 3. Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
A metabolic disorder like gout can masquerade as a tumor and it is important that one is clinically aware of its varied presentations.
Introduction
A diagnostic dilemma where it is necessary to differentiate neoplastic conditions from “neoplastic mimics” is not unusual in musculoskeletal oncology. Gout is one such metabolic disorder that has been known as “The Great Mimicker” since the times of Hippocrates [1]. We present a case report, where gout presented in a way similar to the giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone.
Case Report
A 48-year-old lady had gradually progressive pain and swelling in the right foot for 4 months. It was not associated with signs of infection such as fever, local inflammation, or any signs of chronic arthritis. She had significant comorbidities, including dilated cardiomyopathy with low ejection fraction (15–20%), diabetes mellitus, and chronic hepatitis-C infection. She was evaluated elsewhere with a radiograph and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the foot. Imaging revealed a soft-tissue lesion eroding and involving navicular, calcaneum, and talus with a cystic/necrotic component. A computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy from the soft-tissue component revealed a benign giant cell-rich lesion. She was counseled about the nature of the disease, that is, a GCT of bone and was planned for surgical curettage.On presentation to our institute, there was diffuse swelling of the dorsum of mid-foot with mild pitting edema of forefoot without any associated pain (Fig. 1). All movements of the toes and ankle were a normal without any neurovascular deficits. She was evaluated further with blood investigations which revealed a normal hemogram and raised uric acid of 15.2 (normal range 3.5–7.2 mg/dL) and creatinine levels of 1.8 (normal range 0.7–1.3 mg/dL).
Figure 1
Clinical picture at presentation. Diffuse swelling of the dorsum of mid-foot on the right side with mild pitting edema of fore foot.
Clinical picture at presentation. Diffuse swelling of the dorsum of mid-foot on the right side with mild pitting edema of fore foot.A plain radiograph (Fig. 2) and CT scan (Fig. 3) were done. Plain radiograph of the foot revealed generalized osteoporosis, erosions, osteolytic defects, and calcifications. The so-called “overhanging margins sign” and preservation of joint spaces were evident on CT scan. Imaging features were not unequivocal for GCT. The MRI (Fig. 4) obtained elsewhere previously was reviewed in the multidisciplinary meeting of our institute.
Figure 2
Plain radiograph of the right ankle with foot. Anteroposterior and lateral view of the radiograph reveal osteoporotic changes with multiple osteolytic defects (erosions) involving the multiple bones of the foot, periarticular bone, and subchondral bone with subjacent soft-tissue having foci of calcification (white arrow).
Figure 3
Computed tomography scan of the right foot: Axial section (a) and sagittal section (b). Multiple round punched out lytic defects (erosions) involving the multiple bones of the foot near tendons, synovium and subchondral bone, and periarticular soft tissue. The erosions are well circumscribed, eccentric, having sclerotic margins with protruding lips away from the bone (overhanging margin sign) in periarticular location with preservation of the joint spaces and showing foci of calcifications(white arrow).
Figure 4
Magnetic resonance imaging of the right foot (STIR images): Axial section (a) and sagittal section (b) showing multiple areas of altered signal intensity involving the multiple bones of the foot near tendons, synovium and subchondral bone, and periarticular soft tissue. The navicular bone shows intraosseous erosions extending into the medullary region.
Plain radiograph of the right ankle with foot. Anteroposterior and lateral view of the radiograph reveal osteoporotic changes with multiple osteolytic defects (erosions) involving the multiple bones of the foot, periarticular bone, and subchondral bone with subjacent soft-tissue having foci of calcification (white arrow).Computed tomography scan of the right foot: Axial section (a) and sagittal section (b). Multiple round punched out lytic defects (erosions) involving the multiple bones of the foot near tendons, synovium and subchondral bone, and periarticular soft tissue. The erosions are well circumscribed, eccentric, having sclerotic margins with protruding lips away from the bone (overhanging margin sign) in periarticular location with preservation of the joint spaces and showing foci of calcifications(white arrow).Magnetic resonance imaging of the right foot (STIR images): Axial section (a) and sagittal section (b) showing multiple areas of altered signal intensity involving the multiple bones of the foot near tendons, synovium and subchondral bone, and periarticular soft tissue. The navicular bone shows intraosseous erosions extending into the medullary region.The biopsy slides were also reviewed. The earlier diagnosis of GCT was considered unlikely based on the appearance under the microscope (Fig. 5) which showed features such as organized granulomatous reaction, central acellular amorphous eosinophilic zone surrounded by corona zone composed of foreign body giant cell reaction, lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, and histiocytes. Distinct foreign body giant cells were noted; however, no tumor giant cells were seen. There were no nuclear atypia and no mitosis. No native bone, cartilage, synovium, or calcification were seen in the biopsy.
Figure 5
Histopathological photomicrographs: 10× image (a) 40× image (b). Features like organized granulomatous reaction, central acellular amorphous eosinophilic zone surrounded by corona zone composed of foreign body giant cell reaction, lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, and histiocytes noted.
Histopathological photomicrographs: 10× image (a) 40× image (b). Features like organized granulomatous reaction, central acellular amorphous eosinophilic zone surrounded by corona zone composed of foreign body giant cell reaction, lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, and histiocytes noted.Gout was suggested as the most probable diagnosis after re-discussion in the tumor board meeting by corroborating the clinical, radiological, and pathological findings. The patient was then referred to a rheumatologist where she was started on the medical line of management to which she responded well.
Discussion
Gout is a disorder of uric acid metabolism (Fig. 6), where the excess of uric acid crystallizes and gets deposited in form of monosodium urate in joints, periarticular tissues, and also in the kidney [2]. The symptoms include episodes of arthritis and chronic nephropathy. Symptom spectrum is known to overlap and mimics numerous diseases with etiologies as varied as infective (bacterial, fungal, and tubercular [3]), inflammatory, autoimmune, or malignant disorder [4, 5].
Figure 6
Chart showing uric acid metabolism.
Chart showing uric acid metabolism.Typically, the first and most striking clinical manifestation of gout is the appearance of podagra, the association of which with its location in a great toe is such that diagnosis of gout presenting with other atypical features is easy to miss, as was in this case. Our patient had corroborative classical features of uric acid overload, including cardiac failure and nephropathy, along with diabetes and symptoms of metabolic syndrome, but the diagnosis was elusive as the presentation was unusual.Gout may present with varied radiological findings such as an expansile bony lesion or an aggressive/destructive or cystic lesion. The plain radiograph may show a well-defined lytic, erosive, peri-articular lesion with an overhanging edge. Typically, the preservation of joint space is noted [6, 7].In the literature, multiple cases of gout as a mimicker of various pathologies, including a few malignant, process, even soft-tissue sarcomas [4], have been described. There have also been reports of gout mimicking a GCT, but that of the tendon sheath, tendon, or soft tissues [8]. In most instances, the patients were known cases of gout, who had presented earlier with gouty arthritis or other classical features of gout and were already under treatment, so the index of suspicion for the lesion being gout was high.Gout masquerading as GCT of bone is rare and reports could not be found in the literature, this being perhaps the first such publication. Such cases where the incidence is rare, needs a highly experienced multidisciplinary musculoskeletal oncology team comprising of a surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, radiologist, and pathologist to decide conclusively that the lesion is a benign condition [9]. Misdiagnosing a malignancy or even a GCT can have far-reaching ramifications.
Conclusion
Gout can present with multiple deceptive symptoms and may be misdiagnosed as malignancies too. Many times, the treatment decisions have to be based on clinical judgment and acumen. This case report reiterates the indispensability of a meticulous examination, detailed workup, impeccable reading of imaging, and confident pathology reporting in the process of rational clinical management and decision making.This case report reiterates the importance of taking an holistic approach for the diagnosis and treatment of a patient and also the need to be aware of the possibility that a metabolic disorder like gout can masquerade as a tumor.