| Literature DB >> 33623683 |
Ana Pérez de José1, Javier Carbayo1, Anna Pocurull2, Teresa Bada-Bosch3, Clara Maria Cases Corona4, Amir Shabaka5, Natàlia Ramos Terrada6, Laura Martinez Valenzuela7, Ana Huerta8, Loreto Fernandez Lorente9, Tamara Gelen Malek-Marín10, Marian Goicoechea1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have shown high rates of sustained virological response in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, the influence of DAAs on the course of kidney involvement in HCV-associated mixed cryoglobulinaemia (HCV-MC) has been little studied. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of antiviral treatment on kidney prognosis and evolution in patients diagnosed with HCV-MC.Entities:
Keywords: cryoglobulinaemia; direct-acting antiviral agents; hepatitis C virus; membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis
Year: 2020 PMID: 33623683 PMCID: PMC7886557 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfz178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Kidney J ISSN: 2048-8505
Baseline characteristics of patients according to HCV treatment
| Characteristics | Global | Untreated | IFN ± RBV | DAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ( | |
| Age (years) | 65 ± 12 | 70 ± 15 | 65 ± 14 | 65 ± 10 |
| Male gender (%) | 51 | 66.7 | 58.3 | 46 |
| Hypertensive (%) | 53 | 60 | 58.3 | 51 |
| Diabetes (%) | 17 | 26.7 | 12.5 | 17 |
| Dyslipidaemia (%) | 12 | 20 | 12.5 | 11 |
| Obesity (%) | 10 | 20 | 4.2 | 10 |
| Baseline clinical presentation | ||||
| Glomerulonephritis, % ( | 46.8 (65) | 53.3 (8) | 83.3 (20) | 37 (37) |
| Purpura (%) | 46 | 13 | 50 | 60 |
| Arthralgia (%) | 32 | 26 | 21 | 42 |
| Skin ulcer (%) | 6 | 6 | 5.3 | 8.4 |
| Peripheral neuropathy (%) | 25 | 6.7 | 12.5 | 36 |
| CKD | ||||
| Serum creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.4 ± 1.1 | 1.9 ± 0.7 | 1.6 ± 0.7 | 1.4 ± 1.1 |
| eGFR (mL/min) | 56 ± 26 | 35 ± 22 | 47 ± 20 | 51 ± 26 |
| Proteinuria (g/day) | 2.1 ± 3 | 3.7 ± 4.4 | 2.9 ± 3.8 | 1.6 ± 2.3 |
| Microhaematuria (%) | ||||
| No | 32 | 14 | 5 | 11 |
| 1–5 red blood cells per field | 30 | 40 | 25 | 36 |
| 5–10 red blood cells per field | 10 | 13 | 14 | 14 |
| >20 red blood cells per field | 28 | 33 | 56 | 39 |
| Plasma albumin (g/dL) | 3.8 ± 0.6 | 2.9 ± 0.8 | 3.6 ± 1.06 | 3.8 ± 0.6 |
| Kidney biopsy, % ( | 46.8 (65) | 53.3 (8) | 83.3 (20) | 37 (37) |
| Cryoglobulinaemia (%) | ||||
| Type II | 74 | 70 | 50 | 80 |
| Type III | 26 | 40 | 50 | 20 |
| Cirrhosis (%) | 44 | 40 | 25 | 50 |
| Genotype 1b (%) | 75 | 60 | 70.8 | 78 |
| Previously treated (%) | 27 | 7 | 17 | 37 |
| Duration of treatment (months) | 20 ± 12 | 36 ± 17 | 16 ± 6 | |
| Virological response (%) | ||||
| Non-sustained response | 20 | 56.5 | 2 | |
| Sustained response | 80 | 43.5 | 98 | |
| Hepatic transplant, % ( | 5.8 (8) | 17 (2) | 5 (1) | 5 (5) |
| Baseline laboratory findings | ||||
| HCV RNA level log10 (IU/mL) | 5.7 ± 1 | 5.8 ± 0.6 | 5.2 ± 1.4 | 5.8 ± 1.1 |
| Alanine aminotransferase (IU/mL) | 63 ± 54 | 66 ± 66 | 62 ± 54 | 63 ± 53 |
| Cryocrit (%) | 6 ± 7 | 6.8 ± 13 | 8.5 ± 9 | 5 ± 4.3 |
| Baseline C3 (mg/dL) | 71 ± 43 | 74 ± 30 | 78 ± 36 | 62 ± 43 |
| Baseline C4 (mg/dL) | 8 ± 8.5 | 15 ± 6.4 | 7.7 ± 8.1 | 7 ± 8 |
| Positive RF | 254 ± 551 | 290 ± 140 | 293 ± 320 | 267 ± 616 |
| Treatment (%) | ||||
| Renin–angiotensin system blockers | 65 | 73 | 79 | 61 |
| Plasmapheresis | 16 | 13 | 42 | 10 |
| Corticosteroids | 45 | 27 | 54 | 45 |
| Rituximab | 25 | 13 | 29 | 26 |
| Cyclophosphamide | 4 | 0 | 12 | 3 |
| Furosemide | 39 | 40 | 46 | 37 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD unless states otherwise.
Effects of comorbidities and types of antiviral treatment on kidney survival (Cox regression model)
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAA treatment | HR 0.414 (0.225–0.761), P = 0.005 | HR 0.436 (0.235–0.809), P = 0.008 | HR 0.400 (0.218–0.733), P = 0.003 | HR 0.403 (0.219–0.741), P = 0.003 |
| Hypertension | HR 2.065 (0.701–6.079) | |||
| Dyslipidaemia | HR 2.621 (0.803–8.554) | |||
| Obesity | HR 0.822 (0.382–1.766) | |||
| Diabetes | HR = 1.746 (0.483–6.320) |
FIGURE 1Kaplan–Meier curve showing kidney survival in patients treated with DAAs (group 1), those treated with IFN ± RBV (group 2) and untreated patients (group 3).
FIGURE 2Kaplan–Meier curve showing mortality in patients treated with DAAs (group 1), those treated with IFN ± RBV (group 2) and untreated patients (group 3).
FIGURE 3Proteinuria at baseline, at the end of treatment and at the end of follow-up in patients treated with DAAs (group 1), those treated with IFN ± RBV (group 2) and untreated patients (group 3).
FIGURE 4eGFR at baseline, at the end of treatment and at the end of follow-up in patients treated with DAAs (group 1), those treated with IFN ± RBV (group 2) and untreated patients (group 3).