Literature DB >> 33623335

A Cross-sectional Study on Sense of Coherence and Its Relationship with Caries Experience and Socioeconomic Status in 11-16-year-old Schoolchildren.

Kantipudi Jn Mrudhula1, C Vinay1, K S Uloopi1, Kakarla Sri RojaRamya1, Rayala Chandrasekhar1.   

Abstract

AIM: To know the association of sense of coherence (SOC), caries experience, and socioeconomic status (SES) in 11-16-year-old schoolchildren.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included a total of 595 schoolchildren aged 11-16 years, and informed consent was obtained. Demographic and socioeconomic data were collected through pro forma filled by the parents. Sense of coherence of children was recorded with SOC-13 item questionnaire given in both English and local language (Telugu). Caries experience was recorded with DMFT index by carrying out the intra-oral examination of children.
RESULTS: In a total of 595 schoolchildren, 35% children have weak SOC, 34.9% have moderate SOC, and 29.9% have strong SOC. Caries experience was inversely associated with SOC (p value = 0.006) on analysis by ANOVA. On multivariate regression analysis, it was observed that for every one-unit increase in SOC, caries experience decreased by 0.11 unit. However, there was statistically no significant (p value = 0.09) relation between childhood SES and SOC. Age (p value = 0.08) and gender (p value = 0.19) are not associated with SOC.
CONCLUSION: Sense of coherence influences the caries experience irrespective of socioeconomic status, age, and gender of the child. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Children having stronger SOC have increased likelihood to seek out preventive dental services, which helps in maintaining good oral health. SOC is structured mainly by the experiences during the early years of life. Therefore, SOC can be strengthened by interventions in the early life through school dental health programs. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Mrudhula KJN, Vinay C, Uloopi KS, et al. A Cross-sectional Study on Sense of Coherence and Its Relationship with Caries Experience and Socioeconomic Status in 11-16-year-old Schoolchildren. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(5):493-496.
Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caries experience; Cross-sectional study; Sense of coherence; Socioeconomic status

Year:  2020        PMID: 33623335      PMCID: PMC7887174          DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 0974-7052


Introduction

Sense of coherence (SOC) is the fundamental concept of Antonovsky's salutogenic theory, which is directed toward the factors responsible for health rather than the illness. Salutogenesis concept elucidates why some individuals stay healthy, even after encountering highly stressful situations, while others suffer disease and illness.[1] It is learnt that a person with higher SOC is able to cope adequately and find appropriate solutions to challenges (mastery orientation), thereby stays healthy.[2] SOC is a global orientation that explains the extent to which individual has a pervasive, dynamic feeling of confidence that: (i) the stimuli deriving from one's internal and external environments in his/her life are structured, predictable, and explicable; (ii) the resources are available to one to meet the demands raised by these stimuli; and (iii) these demands are challenges that deserve investment and engagement.[1] Sense of coherence influences the origin and healing of the disease through effective coping, by avoiding behaviors that adversely affect health, and adopting behaviors that promotes health.[1,3] It is also hypothesized that SOC is influenced by socioeconomic status (SES). Higher SES during the early years of life provides experiences that promote the development of strong SOC, whereas the reverse happen in lower SES.[4] Thus, it is predictable that higher childhood SES is correlated positively with stronger adulthood SOC.[5,6] It is believed that stronger SOC predicts better oral health outcomes by possessing more number of teeth with low level of dental caries and periodontal disease.[7] However, there is a paucity of literature regarding the association of SOC, oral health, and SES. Therefore, a study was carried out to understand the relationship of SOC, caries experience, and SES in 11–16-year-old schoolchildren.

Materials and Methods

The cross-sectional study design has been approved by Institutional Review Board (VDC/IEC/2014-18). A total of 595 healthy schoolchildren aged 11–16 years were selected by stratified randomization method from 5 pre-selected schools of Bhimavaram town, West Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh. Informed consent was obtained from the parents and school authorities. Children who are undergoing orthodontic treatment, suffering from any systemic diseases, in need of special care, and with mixed dentition were excluded from the study.

Sample Size

Based on the pilot study, setting the confidence level at 95%, prevalence 49%, and precision 5%, the required sample size was calculated as 384 using the formula n = (Zα[2]×p·q)/d[2]. However, a higher sample size of 650 children was taken to permit for possible non-response, in which 55 children were excluded since they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Hence, the final sample comprised of 595 children.

Data Collection

Data were collected through a pro forma (given to parents), the SOC questionnaire, and intra-oral examination, which was carried out at the schools. Parents of the participating children were given a pro forma for recording demographic data (name, age, sex, address and contact number), profession, level of education, and income to assess SES with Kuppuswamy socioeconomic criteria.[8] SOC of children was recorded with abbreviated version of the SOC-13 item questionnaire that was developed by Antonovsky, which comprises of 13 components on a 7-point Likert-type scale with descriptive end points.[1] Question numbers 1, 3, 7, and 10 were negatively framed items; therefore, they were scored conversely so that a high score indicates strong SOC. The total score ranges from 13 to 91, and a higher score indicates stronger SOC. Reliability of SOC questionnaire was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha coefficient formula, and the alpha coefficient obtained was 0.89, which is an acceptable reliability. Questionnaire for recording the sense of coherence was given in both English and local language (Telugu). Questions were explained to children and then they were allowed to answer. Later, the schoolchildren were examined for caries experience by recording the DMFT index.[9] Two examiners were calibrated for intra-oral examination at the schools. Kappa test findings for DMFT were 0.88 for intra-examiner, and 0.82 for inter-examiner, indicating an almost perfect consistent agreement.

Statistical Analysis

The association of sense of coherence with caries experience was analyzed using ANOVA. Multivariate analysis was performed to know the relationship of caries experience with SOC and SES. The total SOC was assessed as a categorical variable divided into tertiles as t1 < 33 (weak), t2 = 33–66 (moderate), and t3 > 66 (strong). Chi-square test was done to analyze the relationship of SOC with SES, age, and gender.

Results

Among 595 schoolchildren, 35% children have weak SOC, 34.9% moderate SOC, and 29.9% stronger SOC. Sense of coherence has shown inverse relation with the caries experience of an individual, i.e., higher the sense of coherence, lower the DMFT score. There was statistically significant difference between caries experience in individuals with different SOC (Table 1). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, for every oneunit increase in SOC, caries experience decreased by 0.11 unit (Table 2).
Table 1

Association of sense of coherence with caries experience

SOCDMFT
MeanSD
Weak SOC (t1 < 33)1.942.04
Moderate SOC (t2 = 33–66)1.702.05
Strong SOC (t3 > 66)1.451.84
ANOVAF2.91
P0.05, S
Post Hoc TukeyWeak vs moderate, p = 0.446
Moderate vs strong, p = 0.427
Weak vs strong, p = 0.043, S

ANOVA and Post Hoc Tukey tests, S—significant; ANOVA—analysis of variance

Table 2

Table representing the ordinal regression value by multivariate analysis with caries experience as dependable variable and sense of coherence as predictor

Coefficients
ModelUnstandardized coefficientsStandardized coefficientstp value
BStd. errorODDS ratio
Caries experience(Constant)−1.240.38−3.290.001
SOC−0.080.03−0.11−2.750.006, S

Multivariate analysis, S—significant

There was no statistically significant relation between SOC and SES suggesting SOC was not influenced by the childhood SES (p value = 0.09) (Table 3). Statistically, SOC scores did not show any significant difference with age (p value = 0.08) (Table 4) as well as gender (p = 0.19) (Table 5).
Table 3

Relationship between sense of coherence and socioeconomic status

SESWeak SOC (t1<33)Moderate SOC (t2 = 33–66)Strong SOC (t3>66)Total
n%n%n%
Lower class  2336.5  1930.2  2133.3  63
Upper lower class  3629.8  5444.6  3125.6121
Lower middle class  6435.4  6535.9  5228.7181
Upper middle class  4632.4  4330.3  5337.3142
Upper class  4045.5  2730.7  2123.9  88
Total20935.120835.017829.9595
p = 0.09, NS; χ2 = 13.81

Chi-square test, NS—not significant

Table 4

Age-wise comparison of sense of coherence

Age in yearsWeak SOC (t1 < 33)Moderate SOC (t2 = 33–66)Strong SOC (t3 > 66)Total
n%n%n%
11    7  26.9  13  50.0    6  23.1  26
  12  22  32.8  17  25.4  28  41.8  67
  13  74  36.6  66  32.7  62  30.7202
  14  76  34.2  84  37.8  62  27.9222
  15  26  35.1  28  37.8  20  27.0  74
  16    4100.0    0    0.0    0    0.0    4
Total209  35.1208  35.0178  29.9595
p = 0.08, NS; χ2 = 16.72

Chi-square test, NS—not significant

Table 5

Gender-wise comparison of sense of coherence

GenderWeak SOC (t1 < 33)Moderate SOC (t2 = 33–66)Strong SOC (t3 > 66)Total
n%n%n%
Male  9332.611038.68228.8285
Female11637.49831.69631.0310
p = 0.19, NS; χ2 = 3.28

Chi-square test, NS—not significant

Association of sense of coherence with caries experience ANOVA and Post Hoc Tukey tests, S—significant; ANOVA—analysis of variance

Discussion

The sense of coherence (SOC) is a principal conception of salutogenesis which explains the relationship between life stresses and health. The salutogenic theory emphasizes on healthy resources and contributes to the knowledge of maintenance of health.[1] Adolescents with strong SOC tend to have regular dental check-ups and higher toothbrushing frequency (twice daily or more often).[10] In the present study, children with stronger SOC were associated with less caries experience. These findings were similar to the observations of Freire et al. in Brazilian population that adolescents with stronger SOC have less caries experience in anterior teeth than those with weaker SOC scores.[10] Similar findings were observed in Finnish and Indian populations.[7,11] Lower prevalence of dental caries in individuals with stronger SOC could be because of the fact that increased psychosocial ability promotes health. The health-promoting role of SOC is through three different ways (i) by modulating emotional tension caused by the stressors; (ii) by adopting healthy behaviors; and (iii) by direct physiological response through the central pathways of the neuro-immune and endocrine systems.[1,12] The lower caries experience was mainly accounted to the adoption of healthy dental behaviors such as regular dental check-ups, brushing teeth two or more times a day as well as having low sugar intake frequency.[13-16] These perspectives toward oral health helps in improving oral hygiene, thereby reducing the caries experience. SOC is a psychosocial factor that is influenced by various genetic, environmental, and social factors. Among various social factors, childhood SES was considered to play a vital role in the development of SOC. In the present study, SES of the children was assessed using Kuppuswamy socioeconomic status scale, which is a composite scoring system that includes education, head of the family's occupation, and monthly income of the family.[8] The difference in SOC scores among five socioeconomic groups was found to be insignificant in the present study. Ing and Reutter observed that SOC score of Canadian women was increased with an increase in the household income.[17] Bernabe et al. reported that higher childhood SES has favorable association with stronger SOC in adulthood.[6] This infers that SES shapes SOC, however in the present study, no such correlation was observed. This may be due to difference in the criteria used to categorize the children's SES. A composite scoring system was used in the present study rather than household income alone. Table representing the ordinal regression value by multivariate analysis with caries experience as dependable variable and sense of coherence as predictor Multivariate analysis, S—significant Relationship between sense of coherence and socioeconomic status Chi-square test, NS—not significant Age-wise comparison of sense of coherence Chi-square test, NS—not significant Gender-wise comparison of sense of coherence Chi-square test, NS—not significant In the current study, gender did not influence the SOC of children. Similar findings were observed in South African eighth-grade adolescents and Danish adults.[18,19] Although there was no gender difference in SOC of adults, Thome and Hallberg, and Hendrikx et al. reported that males have a stronger SOC than females.[20,21] Dorri et al. also observed that boys are having stronger SOC than girls in Iranian population.[22] The gender differences with SOC scores may be due to the differences in social roles played by males and females in diverse communities. Another factor that was considered in the present study was age. Age of the children did not influence the SOC. Similar findings were reported by Margalit and Eysenck in Israel population.[23] On the contrary, in a study by Lindmark et al. in 20–80 years old adult Swedish population, it was reported that 20-year-olds are having lower SOC scores than older age-groups.[24] However, in the present study, a narrow range of age-groups, 11 to 16 years old, were included, which might be the reason for non-influence of age on SOC. Salutogenesis model states that individuals with strong SOC have increased likelihood to figure out the existing resources to cope with the demands. Thus, stronger the SOC, greater the chances to seek out preventive dental services, which helps in maintaining good oral health.[2,25] Moreover, SOC is structured mainly by the experiences during the early years of life, such as participation in socially valued decision-making.[1,12] Therefore, SOC can be strengthened by interventions in the early life through school dental health programs.

Conclusion

The psychosocial factor sense of coherence has association with caries experience; however, the childhood socioeconomic status did not influence the development of sense of coherence in children. Age and gender of children did not influence the sense of coherence.
  20 in total

1.  The development of the sense of coherence: a retrospective study of early life experiences in the family.

Authors:  S Sagy; H Antonovsky
Journal:  Int J Aging Hum Dev       Date:  2000

2.  Socioeconomic status, sense of coherence and health in Canadian women.

Authors:  Joan D Ing; Linda Reutter
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2003 May-Jun

3.  Sense of coherence and oral health in dentate adults: findings from the Finnish Health 2000 survey.

Authors:  Eduardo Bernabé; Richard G Watt; Aubrey Sheiham; Anna L Suominen-Taipale; Antti Uutela; Miira M Vehkalahti; Matti Knuuttila; Mika Kivimäki; Georgios Tsakos
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 8.728

4.  Sense of coherence as a determinant of toothbrushing frequency and level of oral hygiene.

Authors:  Jarno J Savolainen; Anna-Liisa Suominen-Taipale; Antti K Uutela; Tuija P Martelin; Mirka C Niskanen; Matti L E Knuuttila
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.993

5.  Updating income ranges for Kuppuswamy's socio-economic status scale for the year 2014.

Authors:  Sukhvinder Singh Oberoi
Journal:  Indian J Public Health       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

6.  Sense of coherence and four-year caries incidence in Finnish adults.

Authors:  E Bernabé; J T Newton; A Uutela; A Aromaa; A L Suominen
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Sense of coherence and its relationship with oral health-related behaviour and knowledge of and attitudes towards oral health.

Authors:  U Lindmark; M Hakeberg; A Hugoson
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 3.383

8.  Quality of life in older people with cancer -- a gender perspective.

Authors:  B Thomé; I R Hallberg
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.520

9.  The influence of sense of coherence on the relationship between childhood socioeconomic status and adult oral health-related behaviours.

Authors:  Eduardo Bernabé; Richard G Watt; Aubrey Sheiham; Anna L Suominen-Taipale; Anne Nordblad; Jarno Savolainen; Mika Kivimäki; Georgios Tsakos
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.383

10.  The distribution of ''sense of coherence'' among Swedish adults: a quantitative cross-sectional population study.

Authors:  Ulrika Lindmark; Ulf Stenström; Elisabeth Wärnberg Gerdin; Anders Hugoson
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.021

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.