Amos Lal1, Andrew C F Hui2. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Multidisciplinary Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care Group, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, National University Hospital Cluster, Singapore.
Jacob et al. present an insight on the link of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) with bacterial infection.[1] The manuscript has a significant impact as it is possibly the largest cohort of patients reported from Southern India with CVT and concurrent bacterial infection. It is well established that a local site infection such as facial infection, sinusitis, orbital cellulitis, pharyngitis, otitis, or trauma can be linked temporally as a trigger for CVT and it is very well iterated by the authors. Although the manuscript is heavily tilted toward highlighting bacterial infections as the cause of CVT in this cohort, a thorough reading brings up some important considerations for future exploration.Authors in this observational descriptive study highlight an association of CVT with bacterial infections, but other infective causes such as fungal and viral infections have been reported in clinical practice.[2] Jacob et al., in their study have lacked the extensive workup profile that these patients usually demand. This includes an extended thrombophilia panel comprising CRP, fibrinogen, fibrin, D-dimer, antithrombin-3, thrombin-antithrombin complexes, prothrombin fragment F1+2, plasminogen, PAI-1 and thrombomodulin, prothrombin gene mutation, hereditary hyperhomocysteinemia, deficiency of Protein C and Protein S[34] which ideally should be done in a non-acute setting after the resolution of this acute phase.Summarizing these patients in terms of other systemic diseases such as the presence of Crohn’s disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, Wegener granulomatosis, Behcet syndrome and ulcerative colitis could also be beneficial.[5]Authors in future studies can also aim to investigate in detail the evaluation of the thrombotic risk profile and vascular system to elucidate potential risk factors for CVT. In patients with profound septicemia secondary to bacterial infection, it is also well known that disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) itself can be a risk factor for CVT.[6]In the current study we lack details on the work up for a concurrent DIC.Due to the rarity of this entity there is paucity of robust data establishing a direct connection cause–effect relationship between CVT and systemic infection. A better study design would be to compare this cohort of patients (with CVT) against a matched control group with bacterial infections (but no CVT) and further explore why a certain subset of patients with bacterial infection developed CVT while others did not. Early recognition of cerebral venous thrombosis which may present with non-specific clinical signs such as fever and headache is critical. More specific clinical findings such as periorbital swelling and ophthalmoplegia may be harbinger of an already advanced pathological course and may need aggressive approach for a good outcome. Other complications can include DIC, meningitis, subdural empyema, brain abscess, blindness, pan hypopituitarism, intracranial hypertension, infectious arteritis or mycotic aneurysm of the internal carotid artery, vasospasm, septic emboli, hemorrhagic infarction, coma, and death. Mortality rates as high as 80% in the era before antibiotics have diminished to below 8–13%.[78] With the advancement in the care of our critically illpatients in modern medicine with antibiotics and anticoagulation, the risk of long-term sequelae is reduced but still remains significant in up to 50% of survivors. The study period for this specific paper has spread over a span of 15 years and a significant amount of changes have come through for the management of these patients in terms of anticoagulation and early antibiotics. It would be of great interest to the reader of this journal and the others in the field of Neurology and Infectious diseases if the authors can follow this up with another study describing the outcome of these patients longitudinally highlighting the risk factors for poor outcome and residual neurological deficits. We would like to congratulate the authors for publishing this interesting work and the continual commitment to improve the outcome of CVTpatients with rigorous research and vigor.
Authors: Manna S Jacob; Karthik Gunasekaran; Angel T Miraclin; Mohammad Sadiq; C Vignesh Kumar; Ajoy Oommen; Maria Koshy; Ajay Kumar Mishra; Ramya Iyadurai Journal: Ann Indian Acad Neurol Date: 2020-08-14 Impact factor: 1.383
Authors: Garett S Frank; Jesse M Smith; Brett W Davies; David M Mirsky; Eric M Hink; Vikram D Durairaj Journal: J AAPOS Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 1.220
Authors: A J Grau; F Buggle; C Steichen-Wiehn; S Heindl; T Banerjee; R Seitz; R Winter; M Forsting; E Werle; C Bode Journal: Stroke Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: A J Grau; F Buggle; S Heindl; C Steichen-Wiehn; T Banerjee; M Maiwald; M Rohlfs; H Suhr; W Fiehn; H Becher Journal: Stroke Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 7.914