| Literature DB >> 33623085 |
Ciro Civile1, Samantha Quaglia2, Emika Waguri2, Maddy Ward2, Rossy McLaren2, I P L McLaren3.
Abstract
We believe we are now in a position to answer the question, "Are faces special?" inasmuch as this applies to the face inversion effect (better performance for upright vs inverted faces). Using a double-blind, between-subject design, in two experiments (n = 96) we applied a specific tDCS procedure targeting the Fp3 area while participants performed a matching-task with faces (Experiment 1a) or checkerboards from a familiar prototype-defined category (Experiment 1b). Anodal tDCS eliminated the checkerboard inversion effect reliably obtained in the sham group, but only reduced it for faces (although the reduction was significant). Thus, there is a component to the face inversion effect that we are not affecting with a tDCS procedure that can eliminate the checkerboard inversion effect. We suggest that the reduction reflects the loss of an expertise-based component in the face inversion effect, and the residual is due to a face-specific component of that effect.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33623085 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83844-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379