Literature DB >> 33622905

Prognostic Evaluation of the Site of Invasion in Pathological Stage T3a Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Gu-Shun Lai1, Jian-Ri Li2,3,4, Shian-Shiang Wang2,3,5, Chuan-Shu Chen2,3, Chun-Kuang Yang2, Sheng-Chun Hung2,3, Chen-Li Cheng2,3, Yen-Chuan Ou3,6, Kun-Yuan Chiu7,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: To investigate the prognostic values of fat invasion (FI) and renal vein invasion (RVI) in pT3a renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as single factors or concomitant presence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 173 patients who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy for RCC in our Institution.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up time of 48 months, patients with RVI showed significantly increased risk of disease recurrence and worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) when compared to those with FI (p=0.007, p=0.022, respectively). Having combined RVI and FI did not show inferior prognosis compared to those with RVI only. In multivariable analysis, RVI was an independent factor for disease recurrence (HR=2.06, 95% CI=1.10-3.87, p=0.024) and CSS (HR=2.46, 95% CI=1.01-6.0, p=0.048).
CONCLUSION: For patients with T3a renal tumors, RVI was associated with inferior prognosis compared to those with FI. Copyright
© 2021, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fat invasion; pathological T3a; prognosis; renal cell carcinoma; renal vein invasion

Year:  2021        PMID: 33622905      PMCID: PMC8045072          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  25 in total

1.  Combined renal sinus fat and perinephric fat renal cell carcinoma invasion has a worse prognosis than either alone.

Authors:  Timothy P Kresowik; Matthew T Johnson; Fadi N Joudi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Pathological stage does not alter the prognosis for renal lesions determined to be stage T1 by computerized tomography.

Authors:  William W Roberts; Sam B Bhayani; Mohamad E Allaf; Theresa Y Chan; Louis R Kavoussi; Thomas W Jarrett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Validation of the 2009 TNM version in a large multi-institutional cohort of patients treated for renal cell carcinoma: are further improvements needed?

Authors:  Giacomo Novara; Vincenzo Ficarra; Alessandro Antonelli; Walter Artibani; Roberto Bertini; Marco Carini; Sergio Cosciani Cunico; Ciro Imbimbo; Nicola Longo; Guido Martignoni; Giuseppe Martorana; Andrea Minervini; Vincenzo Mirone; Francesco Montorsi; Riccardo Schiavina; Roberto Schiavina; Claudio Simeone; Sergio Serni; Alchiede Simonato; Salvatore Siracusano; Alessandro Volpe; Giorgio Carmignani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for non-metastatic pathological T3a renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional comparative analysis.

Authors:  Jong Jin Oh; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee; Sung Kyu Hong; Eun Sik Lee; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Cheol Kwak; Ja Hyeon Ku; Chang Wook Jeong; Yong-June Kim; Seok Ho Kang; Sung Hoo Hong
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.369

5.  Reevaluation of TNM staging of renal cortical tumors: recurrence and survival for T1N0M0 and T3aN0M0 tumors are equivalent.

Authors:  Scott M Gilbert; Alana M Murphy; Aaron E Katz; Erik T Goluboff; Ihor S Sawczuk; Carl A Olsson; Mitchell C Benson; James M McKiernan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Prognostic evaluation of perinephric fat, renal sinus fat, and renal vein invasion for patients with pathological stage T3a clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Paras H Shah; Timothy D Lyon; Christine M Lohse; John C Cheville; Bradley C Leibovich; Stephen A Boorjian; R Houston Thompson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  The prognostic value of the site of invasion in T3aN0M0 clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Shengjie Guo; Zefu Liu; Xiangdong Li; Kai Yao; Pei Dong; Dong Chen; Chunxian Liao; Zhaolin Long; Yongqiang Wang; Fangjian Zhou; Xiaobo He; Zhuowei Liu
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.498

8.  Invasion of renal sinus fat is not an independent predictor of survival in pT3a renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Stephen A Poon; Joshua R Gonzalez; Mitchell C Benson; James M McKiernan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Changhee Yoo; Cheryn Song; Jun Hyuk Hong; Choung-Soo Kim; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  The Difference in Prognosis between Renal Sinus Fat and Perinephric Fat Invasion for pT3a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhiling Zhang; Chunping Yu; Liliya Velet; Yonghong Li; Lijuan Jiang; Fangjian Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Oncological Outcomes of Patients With Different Pathological Features of pT3a Renal Tumor: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Synthesis.

Authors:  Pengju Guo; Yongxing Wang; Yili Han; Dechao Wei; Jiahui Zhao; Mingchuan Li; Yongguang Jiang; Yong Luo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 6.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.