Literature DB >> 33622900

Neo-Bioscore in Guiding Post-surgical Therapy in Patients With Triple-negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Yoriko Hasegawa1, Nobuaki Matsubara1, Takahiro Kogawa1, Yoichi Naito1, Kenichi Harano1, Ako Hosono1, Tatsuya Onishi2, Takashi Hojo2, Mototsugu Shimokawa3, Toru Mukohara4.   

Abstract

AIM: Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have not achieved pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) were considered for adjuvant capecitabine. This study was to explore the utility of the Neo-Bioscore in guiding post-surgical therapy in TNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Neo-Bioscore was calculated for patients with non-metastatic primary breast cancer who received NAC at National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.
RESULTS: A total of 329 patients were evaluated. The Neo-Bioscore stratified prognosis after NAC better than clinical or pathological stage. The Neo-Bioscore performed well in the selection of patients with TNBC with excellent prognoses despite non-pCR; no death was observed in patients who had a Neo-Bioscore of 2, the lowest score in those with TNBC.
CONCLUSION: The Neo-Bioscore can improve the prognostic stratification of patients after NAC for breast cancer over clinical and pathological staging and may enable the identification of patients with non-pCR TNBC who can avoid additional adjuvant chemotherapy. Copyright
© 2021, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neo-Bioscore; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; prognosis; triple-negative breast cancer

Year:  2021        PMID: 33622900      PMCID: PMC8045094          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  15 in total

1.  Estimation of time-dependent area under the ROC curve for long-term risk prediction.

Authors:  Lloyd E Chambless; Guoqing Diao
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Davide Mauri; Nicholas Pavlidis; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with tumours considered too large for breast conserving surgery: preliminary results of a randomised trial: S6.

Authors:  S M Scholl; A Fourquet; B Asselain; J Y Pierga; J R Vilcoq; J C Durand; T Dorval; T Palangié; M Jouve; P Beuzeboc
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Utility of the CPS+EG staging system in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Frederik Marmé; Bianca Lederer; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Serban Dan Costa; Carsten Denkert; Holger Eidtmann; Bernd Gerber; Claus Hanusch; Jörn Hilfrich; Jens Huober; Christian Jackisch; Sherko Kümmel; Sibylle Loibl; Stefan Paepke; Michael Untch; Gunter von Minckwitz; Andreas Schneeweiss
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-12-13       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Prognostic Value of Residual Disease after Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Evaluated by Residual Cancer Burden, Neoadjuvant Response Index, and Neo-Bioscore.

Authors:  Tessa G Steenbruggen; Maartje van Seijen; Esther H Lips; Gabe S Sonke; Liselore M Janssen; Mette S van Ramshorst; Erik van Werkhoven; Marie-Jeanne T D F Vrancken Peeters; Jelle Wesseling
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis.

Authors:  Patricia Cortazar; Lijun Zhang; Michael Untch; Keyur Mehta; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark; Hervé Bonnefoi; David Cameron; Luca Gianni; Pinuccia Valagussa; Sandra M Swain; Tatiana Prowell; Sibylle Loibl; D Lawrence Wickerham; Jan Bogaerts; Jose Baselga; Charles Perou; Gideon Blumenthal; Jens Blohmer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Jonas Bergh; Vladimir Semiglazov; Robert Justice; Holger Eidtmann; Soonmyung Paik; Martine Piccart; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Peter A Fasching; Leen Slaets; Shenghui Tang; Bernd Gerber; Charles E Geyer; Richard Pazdur; Nina Ditsch; Priya Rastogi; Wolfgang Eiermann; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Adjuvant Capecitabine for Breast Cancer after Preoperative Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Norikazu Masuda; Soo-Jung Lee; Shoichiro Ohtani; Young-Hyuck Im; Eun-Sook Lee; Isao Yokota; Katsumasa Kuroi; Seock-Ah Im; Byeong-Woo Park; Sung-Bae Kim; Yasuhiro Yanagita; Shinji Ohno; Shintaro Takao; Kenjiro Aogi; Hiroji Iwata; Joon Jeong; Aeree Kim; Kyong-Hwa Park; Hironobu Sasano; Yasuo Ohashi; Masakazu Toi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C W Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  Combined use of clinical and pathologic staging variables to define outcomes for breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Jacqueline S Jeruss; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Susan L Tucker; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Thomas A Buchholz; Aysegul A Sahin; Janice N Cormier; Aman U Buzdar; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Trastuzumab Emtansine for Residual Invasive HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Gunter von Minckwitz; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Max S Mano; Sibylle Loibl; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Michael Untch; Norman Wolmark; Priya Rastogi; Andreas Schneeweiss; Andres Redondo; Hans H Fischer; William Jacot; Alison K Conlin; Claudia Arce-Salinas; Irene L Wapnir; Christian Jackisch; Michael P DiGiovanna; Peter A Fasching; John P Crown; Pia Wülfing; Zhimin Shao; Elena Rota Caremoli; Haiyan Wu; Lisa H Lam; David Tesarowski; Melanie Smitt; Hannah Douthwaite; Stina M Singel; Charles E Geyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 176.079

View more
  2 in total

1.  Stratification of Prognosis by Biological Features Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shinya Yamamoto; Takashi Chishima; Yukako Shibata; Shiori Inoue; Fumi Harada; Hideki Takeuchi; Akimitsu Yamada; Kazutaka Narui; Itaru Endo
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  External verification and improvement of the Neo-Bioscore staging system in a Chinese cohort.

Authors:  Rui Geng; Ningning Min; Yiqiong Zheng; Chenyan Hong; Rilige Wu; Huan Wu; Yufan Wei; Yanjun Zhang; Xiru Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.