Literature DB >> 33622774

Human Sensory Cortex Contributes to the Long-Term Storage of Aversive Conditioning.

Yuqi You1, Joshua Brown2, Wen Li1.   

Abstract

Growing animal data evince a critical role of the sensory cortex in the long-term storage of aversive conditioning, following acquisition and consolidation in the amygdala. Whether and how this function is conserved in the human sensory cortex is nonetheless unclear. We interrogated this question in a human aversive conditioning study using multidimensional assessments of conditioning and long-term (15 d) retention. Conditioned stimuli (CSs; Gabor patches) were calibrated to differentially activate the parvocellular (P) and magnocellular (M) visual pathways, further elucidating cortical versus subcortical mechanisms. Full-blown conditioning and long-term retention emerged for M-biased CS (vs limited effects for P-biased CS), especially among anxious individuals, in all four dimensions assessed: threat appraisal (threat ratings), physiological arousal (skin conductance response), perceptual learning [discrimination sensitivity (d') and response speed], and cortical plasticity [visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and cortical current density]. Interestingly, while behavioral, physiological, and VEP effects were comparable at immediate and delayed assessments, the cortical substrates evolved markedly over time, transferring from high-order cortices [inferotemporal/fusiform cortex and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC)] immediately to the primary and secondary visual cortex after the delay. In sum, the contrast between P- and M-biased conditioning confirms privileged conditioning acquisition via the subcortical pathway while the immediate cortical plasticity lends credence to the triadic amygdala-OFC-fusiform network thought to underlie threat processing. Importantly, long-term retention of conditioning in the basic sensory cortices supports the conserved role of the human sensory cortex in the long-term storage of aversive conditioning.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT A growing network of neural substrates has been identified in threat learning and memory. The sensory cortex plays a key role in long-term threat memory in animals, but such a function in humans remains unclear. To explore this problem, we conducted multidimensional assessments of immediate and delayed (15 d) effects of human aversive conditioning. Behavioral, physiological, and scalp electrophysiological data demonstrated conditioning effects and long-term retention. High-density EEG intracranial source analysis further revealed the cortical underpinnings, implicating high-order cortices immediately and primary and secondary visual cortices after the long delay. Therefore, while high-order cortices support aversive conditioning acquisition (i.e., threat learning), the human sensory cortex (akin to the animal homolog) underpins long-term storage of conditioning (i.e., long-term threat memory).
Copyright © 2021 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aversive conditioning; fear learning and memory; long-term memory; magnocellular and parvocellular visual pathways; neural plasticity; perceptual learning

Year:  2021        PMID: 33622774      PMCID: PMC8026357          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2325-20.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  110 in total

1.  Role of secondary sensory cortices in emotional memory storage and retrieval in rats.

Authors:  Tiziana Sacco; Benedetto Sacchetti
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex promotes long-term memory formation through its role in working memory organization.

Authors:  Robert S Blumenfeld; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Rapid and highly resolving: affective evaluation of olfactorily conditioned faces.

Authors:  Christian Steinberg; Christian Dobel; Harald T Schupp; Johanna Kissler; Ludger Elling; Christo Pantev; Markus Junghöfer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Model-based analysis of skin conductance responses: Towards causal models in psychophysiology.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Selective synaptic remodeling of amygdalocortical connections associated with fear memory.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Dan-Qian Liu; Wei Huang; Juan Deng; Yangang Sun; Yi Zuo; Mu-Ming Poo
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Long-term consolidation and retention of learning-induced tuning plasticity in the auditory cortex of the guinea pig.

Authors:  Veronica V Galván; Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  Fear-Related Signals in the Primary Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Zhihan Li; An Yan; Kun Guo; Wu Li
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Neural signatures of human fear conditioning: an updated and extended meta-analysis of fMRI studies.

Authors:  M A Fullana; B J Harrison; C Soriano-Mas; B Vervliet; N Cardoner; A Àvila-Parcet; J Radua
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 9.  Emotion processing and the amygdala: from a 'low road' to 'many roads' of evaluating biological significance.

Authors:  Luiz Pessoa; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Response plasticity of single neurons in rabbit auditory association cortex during tone-signalled learning.

Authors:  N Kraus; J F Disterhoft
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-08-26       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pattern differentiation and tuning shift in human sensory cortex underlie long-term threat memory.

Authors:  Yuqi You; Lucas R Novak; Kevin J Clancy; Wen Li
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 10.900

2.  No trait anxiety influences on early and late differential neuronal responses to aversively conditioned faces across three different tasks.

Authors:  Sebastian Schindler; Jana Heinemann; Maximilian Bruchmann; Robert Moeck; Thomas Straube
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.526

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.