Antje Fuss1, Humphrey D Mazigo2, Andreas Mueller3. 1. Medical Mission Institute, Hermann-Schell-Str. 7, 97074, Wuerzburg, Germany. antje.fuss@medmissio.de. 2. Department of Medical Parasitology and Entomology, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, P.O. Box 1464, Mwanza, Tanzania. 3. Department of Tropical Medicine, Klinikum Wuerzburg Mitte gGmbH, Medical Mission Hospital, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a sensitive and specific method for diagnosing schistosomiasis. However, this method should be performed in a laboratory, usually located distant from the sample collection site. Therefore, it is important to have fast sampling preservation methods, which allow simple transport prior to DNA extraction and amplification. The aim of this study was to verify if blood samples applied to filter paper are suitable for analysis of Schistosoma mansoni DNA by real-time PCR. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 100 study participants aged 17 to 70 years in a fishing village on the southern shore of Lake Victoria, Tanzania. Serum samples and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-anticoagulated whole blood for preparation of dried blood spots (DBS) were collected to test for Schistosoma mansoni infection by real-time PCR. A combined diagnostic reference of positive results of serum-based real-time PCR and the Kato-Katz (KK) method was used for analysis. Sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was chosen to compare the mean cycle threshold (Ct) values from serum and DBS. RESULTS: According to the reference, 92.5% S. mansoni positive samples were determined. The serum-based real-time PCR performed excellently with 95.4% sensitivity, whereas the DBS-based real-time PCR showed a low sensitivity (45.4%). The Ct-values were significantly higher in DBS (median: 37.3) than in serum samples (median: 27.5, P < 0.001), reflecting a lower parasite-specific DNA load on the filter cards. With increasing egg counts, an increase in sensitivity was observed for all methods. The POC-CCA test and the serum-based real-time PCR showed a sensitivity of 100% for medium and severe infections. The DBS real-time PCR showed a sensitivity of only 85.7% even for severe infections. CONCLUSIONS: DBS-based real-time PCR did not provide good results in our study and therefore should not be recommended or must be tested concerning temperature of storage, storage duration, use of different filter papers and extraction methods before it is used in future studies. In contrast, our results showed that the POC-CCA test is a sensitive and precise test for detecting S. mansoni infections .
BACKGROUND: Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a sensitive and specific method for diagnosing schistosomiasis. However, this method should be performed in a laboratory, usually located distant from the sample collection site. Therefore, it is important to have fast sampling preservation methods, which allow simple transport prior to DNA extraction and amplification. The aim of this study was to verify if blood samples applied to filter paper are suitable for analysis of Schistosoma mansoni DNA by real-time PCR. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 100 study participants aged 17 to 70 years in a fishing village on the southern shore of Lake Victoria, Tanzania. Serum samples and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-anticoagulated whole blood for preparation of dried blood spots (DBS) were collected to test for Schistosoma mansoni infection by real-time PCR. A combined diagnostic reference of positive results of serum-based real-time PCR and the Kato-Katz (KK) method was used for analysis. Sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was chosen to compare the mean cycle threshold (Ct) values from serum and DBS. RESULTS: According to the reference, 92.5% S. mansoni positive samples were determined. The serum-based real-time PCR performed excellently with 95.4% sensitivity, whereas the DBS-based real-time PCR showed a low sensitivity (45.4%). The Ct-values were significantly higher in DBS (median: 37.3) than in serum samples (median: 27.5, P < 0.001), reflecting a lower parasite-specific DNA load on the filter cards. With increasing egg counts, an increase in sensitivity was observed for all methods. The POC-CCA test and the serum-based real-time PCR showed a sensitivity of 100% for medium and severe infections. The DBS real-time PCR showed a sensitivity of only 85.7% even for severe infections. CONCLUSIONS: DBS-based real-time PCR did not provide good results in our study and therefore should not be recommended or must be tested concerning temperature of storage, storage duration, use of different filter papers and extraction methods before it is used in future studies. In contrast, our results showed that the POC-CCA test is a sensitive and precise test for detecting S. mansoni infections .
Authors: A Färnert; A P Arez; A T Correia; A Björkman; G Snounou; V do Rosário Journal: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Date: 1999 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.184
Authors: Govert J van Dam; Jing Xu; Robert Bergquist; Claudia J de Dood; Jürg Utzinger; Zhi-Qiang Qin; Wei Guan; Ting Feng; Xin-Ling Yu; Jie Zhou; Ma Zheng; Xiao-Nong Zhou; Paul L A M Corstjens Journal: Acta Trop Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 3.112
Authors: Jennifer A Downs; Paul L A M Corstjens; Julius Mngara; Peter Lutonja; Raphael Isingo; Mark Urassa; Dieuwke Kornelis; Govert J van Dam Journal: Acta Trop Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 3.112
Authors: Maria Cristina Carvalho do Espírito-Santo; Mónica Viviana Alvarado-Mora; Pedro Luiz Silva Pinto; Flair José Carrilho; João Renato Rebello Pinho; Ronaldo Cesar Borges Gryschek Journal: Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo Date: 2012 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.846
Authors: Pedro Fernández-Soto; Javier Gandasegui; Cristina Carranza Rodríguez; José Luis Pérez-Arellano; Beatriz Crego-Vicente; Juan García-Bernalt Diego; Julio López-Abán; Belén Vicente; Antonio Muro Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jean T Coulibaly; Yves K N'Gbesso; Stefanie Knopp; Nicaise A N'Guessan; Kigbafori D Silué; Govert J van Dam; Eliézer K N'Goran; Jürg Utzinger Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2013-03-21