Laura Körber1, Holm Schneider1, Nicole Fleischer2, Sigrun Maier-Wohlfart3. 1. Center for Ectodermal Dysplasias and Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Loschgestr. 15, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. 2. FDNA Inc, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Center for Ectodermal Dysplasias and Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Loschgestr. 15, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. sigrun.maier-wohlfart@uk-erlangen.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XLHED), a rare genetic disorder, affects the normal development of ectodermal derivatives, such as hair, skin, teeth, and sweat glands. It is caused by pathogenic variants of the gene EDA and defined by a triad of hypotrichosis, hypo- or anodontia, and hypo- or anhidrosis which may lead to life-threatening hyperthermia. Although female carriers are less severely affected than male patients, they display symptoms, too, with high phenotypic variability. This study aimed to elucidate whether phenotypic differences in female XLHED patients with identical EDA genotypes might be explained by deviating X-chromosome inactivation (XI) patterns. METHODS: Six families, each consisting of two sisters with the same EDA variant and their parents (with either mother or father being carrier of the variant), participated in this study. XLHED-related data like sweating ability, dental status, facial dysmorphism, and skin issues were assessed. We determined the women`s individual XI patterns in peripheral blood leukocytes by the human androgen receptor assay and collated the results with phenotypic features. RESULTS: The surprisingly large inter- and intrafamilial variability of symptoms in affected females was not explicable by the pathogenic variants. Our cohort showed no higher rate of nonrandom XI in peripheral blood leukocytes than the general female population. Furthermore, skewed XI patterns in favour of the mutated alleles were not associated with more severe phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence for preferential XI in female XLHED patients and no distinct correlation between XLHED-related phenotypic features and XI patterns. Phenotypic variability seems to be evoked by other genetic or epigenetic factors.
BACKGROUND:X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XLHED), a rare genetic disorder, affects the normal development of ectodermal derivatives, such as hair, skin, teeth, and sweat glands. It is caused by pathogenic variants of the gene EDA and defined by a triad of hypotrichosis, hypo- or anodontia, and hypo- or anhidrosis which may lead to life-threatening hyperthermia. Although female carriers are less severely affected than male patients, they display symptoms, too, with high phenotypic variability. This study aimed to elucidate whether phenotypic differences in female XLHEDpatients with identical EDA genotypes might be explained by deviating X-chromosome inactivation (XI) patterns. METHODS: Six families, each consisting of two sisters with the same EDA variant and their parents (with either mother or father being carrier of the variant), participated in this study. XLHED-related data like sweating ability, dental status, facial dysmorphism, and skin issues were assessed. We determined the women`s individual XI patterns in peripheral blood leukocytes by the humanandrogen receptor assay and collated the results with phenotypic features. RESULTS: The surprisingly large inter- and intrafamilial variability of symptoms in affected females was not explicable by the pathogenic variants. Our cohort showed no higher rate of nonrandom XI in peripheral blood leukocytes than the general female population. Furthermore, skewed XI patterns in favour of the mutated alleles were not associated with more severe phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence for preferential XI in female XLHEDpatients and no distinct correlation between XLHED-related phenotypic features and XI patterns. Phenotypic variability seems to be evoked by other genetic or epigenetic factors.
Authors: P Schneider; S L Street; O Gaide; S Hertig; A Tardivel; J Tschopp; L Runkel; K Alevizopoulos; B M Ferguson; J Zonana Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2001-03-14 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: J Kere; A K Srivastava; O Montonen; J Zonana; N Thomas; B Ferguson; F Munoz; D Morgan; A Clarke; P Baybayan; E Y Chen; S Ezer; U Saarialho-Kere; A de la Chapelle; D Schlessinger Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Yaron Gurovich; Yair Hanani; Omri Bar; Guy Nadav; Nicole Fleischer; Dekel Gelbman; Lina Basel-Salmon; Peter M Krawitz; Susanne B Kamphausen; Martin Zenker; Lynne M Bird; Karen W Gripp Journal: Nat Med Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Ewelina Bukowska-Olech; Paweł Gawliński; Anna Jakubiuk-Tomaszuk; Maria Jędrzejowska; Ewa Obersztyn; Michał Piechota; Marta Bielska; Aleksander Jamsheer Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2021-06-26 Impact factor: 4.123