BACKGROUND: The oral microbiota is acquired very early, but the factors shaping its acquisition are not well understood. Previous studies comparing monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins have suggested that host genetics plays a role. However, all twins share an equal portion of their parent's genome, so this model is not informative for studying parent-to-child transmission. We used a novel study design that allowed us to directly examine the genetics of transmission by comparing the oral microbiota of biological versus adoptive mother-child dyads. RESULTS: No difference was observed in how closely oral bacterial community profiles matched for adoptive versus biological mother-child pairs, indicating little if any effect of host genetics on the fidelity of transmission. Both adopted and biologic children more closely resembled their own mother as compared to unrelated women, supporting the role of contact and environment. Mother-child strain similarity increased with the age of the child, ruling out early effects of host genetic influence that are lost over time. No effect on the fidelity of mother-child strain sharing from vaginal birth or breast feeding was seen. Analysis of extended families showed that fathers and mothers were equally similar to their children, and that cohabitating couples showed even greater strain similarity than mother-child pairs. These findings support the role of contact and shared environment, and age, but not genetics, as determinants of microbial transmission, and were consistent at both species and strain level resolutions, and across multiple oral habitats. In addition, analysis of individual species all showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The host is clearly active in shaping the composition of the oral microbiome, since only a few of the many bacterial species in the larger environment are capable of colonizing the human oral cavity. Our findings suggest that these host mechanisms are universally shared among humans, since no effect of genetic relatedness on fidelity of microbial transmission could be detected. Instead our findings point towards contact and shared environment being the driving factors of microbial transmission, with a unique combination of these factors ultimately shaping the highly personalized human oral microbiome. Video abstract.
BACKGROUND: The oral microbiota is acquired very early, but the factors shaping its acquisition are not well understood. Previous studies comparing monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins have suggested that host genetics plays a role. However, all twins share an equal portion of their parent's genome, so this model is not informative for studying parent-to-child transmission. We used a novel study design that allowed us to directly examine the genetics of transmission by comparing the oral microbiota of biological versus adoptive mother-child dyads. RESULTS: No difference was observed in how closely oral bacterial community profiles matched for adoptive versus biological mother-child pairs, indicating little if any effect of host genetics on the fidelity of transmission. Both adopted and biologic children more closely resembled their own mother as compared to unrelated women, supporting the role of contact and environment. Mother-child strain similarity increased with the age of the child, ruling out early effects of host genetic influence that are lost over time. No effect on the fidelity of mother-child strain sharing from vaginal birth or breast feeding was seen. Analysis of extended families showed that fathers and mothers were equally similar to their children, and that cohabitating couples showed even greater strain similarity than mother-child pairs. These findings support the role of contact and shared environment, and age, but not genetics, as determinants of microbial transmission, and were consistent at both species and strain level resolutions, and across multiple oral habitats. In addition, analysis of individual species all showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The host is clearly active in shaping the composition of the oral microbiome, since only a few of the many bacterial species in the larger environment are capable of colonizing the human oral cavity. Our findings suggest that these host mechanisms are universally shared among humans, since no effect of genetic relatedness on fidelity of microbial transmission could be detected. Instead our findings point towards contact and shared environment being the driving factors of microbial transmission, with a unique combination of these factors ultimately shaping the highly personalized human oral microbiome. Video abstract.
Authors: Andres Gomez; Josh L Espinoza; Derek M Harkins; Pamela Leong; Richard Saffery; Michelle Bockmann; Manolito Torralba; Claire Kuelbs; Rohith Kodukula; Jason Inman; Toby Hughes; Jeffrey M Craig; Sarah K Highlander; Marcus B Jones; Chris L Dupont; Karen E Nelson Journal: Cell Host Microbe Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 21.023
Authors: Benjamin J Callahan; Paul J McMurdie; Michael J Rosen; Andrew W Han; Amy Jo A Johnson; Susan P Holmes Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Se Jin Song; Christian Lauber; Elizabeth K Costello; Catherine A Lozupone; Gregory Humphrey; Donna Berg-Lyons; J Gregory Caporaso; Dan Knights; Jose C Clemente; Sara Nakielny; Jeffrey I Gordon; Noah Fierer; Rob Knight Journal: Elife Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Simone S Stahringer; Jose C Clemente; Robin P Corley; John Hewitt; Dan Knights; William A Walters; Rob Knight; Kenneth S Krauter Journal: Genome Res Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Liam Shaw; Andre L R Ribeiro; Adam P Levine; Nikolas Pontikos; Francois Balloux; Anthony W Segal; Adam P Roberts; Andrew M Smith Journal: mBio Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Shinyoung Lee; Peixin Fan; Ting Liu; Anni Yang; Raoul K Boughton; Kim M Pepin; Ryan S Miller; Kwangcheol Casey Jeong Journal: Commun Biol Date: 2022-06-15
Authors: Eleftheria G Charalambous; Sophie B Mériaux; Pauline Guebels; Claude P Muller; Fleur A D Leenen; Martha M C Elwenspoek; Ines Thiele; Johannes Hertel; Jonathan D Turner Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-11-24 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Ramiro Vilchez-Vargas; Jurgita Skieceviciene; Konrad Lehr; Greta Varkalaite; Cosima Thon; Mindaugas Urba; Egidijus Morkūnas; Laimutis Kucinskas; Karolina Bauraite; Denny Schanze; Martin Zenker; Peter Malfertheiner; Juozas Kupcinskas; Alexander Link Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2022-04-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Catherine A Butler; Geoffrey G Adams; Jordan Blum; Samantha J Byrne; Lauren Carpenter; Mark G Gussy; Hanny Calache; Deanne V Catmull; Eric C Reynolds; Stuart G Dashper Journal: J Oral Microbiol Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 5.833