Silvia Guillén-Climent1, Ainara Garzo2, María Nieves Muñoz-Alcaraz3,4,5, Pablo Casado-Adam4, Javier Arcas-Ruiz-Ruano2, Manuela Mejías-Ruiz4, Fernando Jesús Mayordomo-Riera4,6. 1. Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofia University Hospital, University of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain. silvia.guillen@imibic.org. 2. Neurorehabilitation area, Health Division of TECNALIA, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), San Sebastián, Spain. 3. Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofia University Hospital, University of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain. 4. Interlevel Clinical Management Unit of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Reina Sofía University Hospital of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain. 5. Córdoba and Guadalquivir Health District, Andalusia Health Service, Córdoba, Spain. 6. Department of Applied Physics, Radiology and Physical Medicine, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuroscience and neurotechnology are transforming stroke rehabilitation. Robotic devices, in addition to telerehabilitation, are increasingly being used to train the upper limbs after stroke, and their use at home allows us to extend institutional rehabilitation by increasing and prolonging therapy. The aim of this study is to assess the usability of the MERLIN robotic system based on serious games for upper limb rehabilitation in people with stroke in the home environment. METHODS: 9 participants with a stroke in three different stages of recovery (subacute, short-term chronic and long-term chronic) with impaired arm/hand function, were recruited to use the MERLIN system for 3 weeks: 1 week training at the Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), and 2 weeks at the patients' homes. To evaluate usability, the System Usability Scale (SUS), Adapted Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST), and the ArmAssist Usability Assessment Questionnaire were used in the post-intervention. Clinical outcomes for upper limb motor function were assessed pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: 9 patients participated in and completed the study. The usability assessment reported a high level of satisfaction: mean SUS score 71.94 % (SD = 16.38), mean QUEST scale 3.81 (SD = 0.38), and mean Adapted IMI score 6.12 (SD = 1.36). The results of the ArmAssist Questionnaire showed an average of 6 out of 7, which indicates that MERLIN is extremely intuitive, easy to learn and easy to use. Regarding clinical assessment, the Fugl-Meyer scores showed moderate improvements from pre- to post-intervention in the total score of motor function (p = 0.002). There were no significant changes in the Modified Ashworth scale outcomes (p = 0.169). CONCLUSIONS: This usability study indicates that home-based rehabilitation for upper limbs with the MERLIN system is safe, useful, feasible and motivating. Telerehabilitation constitutes a major step forward in the use of intensive rehabilitation at home. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04405609. Registered 06 January 2020-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04405609.
BACKGROUND: Neuroscience and neurotechnology are transforming stroke rehabilitation. Robotic devices, in addition to telerehabilitation, are increasingly being used to train the upper limbs after stroke, and their use at home allows us to extend institutional rehabilitation by increasing and prolonging therapy. The aim of this study is to assess the usability of the MERLIN robotic system based on serious games for upper limb rehabilitation in people with stroke in the home environment. METHODS: 9 participants with a stroke in three different stages of recovery (subacute, short-term chronic and long-term chronic) with impaired arm/hand function, were recruited to use the MERLIN system for 3 weeks: 1 week training at the Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), and 2 weeks at the patients' homes. To evaluate usability, the System Usability Scale (SUS), Adapted Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST), and the ArmAssist Usability Assessment Questionnaire were used in the post-intervention. Clinical outcomes for upper limb motor function were assessed pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: 9 patients participated in and completed the study. The usability assessment reported a high level of satisfaction: mean SUS score 71.94 % (SD = 16.38), mean QUEST scale 3.81 (SD = 0.38), and mean Adapted IMI score 6.12 (SD = 1.36). The results of the ArmAssist Questionnaire showed an average of 6 out of 7, which indicates that MERLIN is extremely intuitive, easy to learn and easy to use. Regarding clinical assessment, the Fugl-Meyer scores showed moderate improvements from pre- to post-intervention in the total score of motor function (p = 0.002). There were no significant changes in the Modified Ashworth scale outcomes (p = 0.169). CONCLUSIONS: This usability study indicates that home-based rehabilitation for upper limbs with the MERLIN system is safe, useful, feasible and motivating. Telerehabilitation constitutes a major step forward in the use of intensive rehabilitation at home. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04405609. Registered 06 January 2020-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04405609.
Authors: Chetan P Phadke; Chitralakshmi K Balasubramanian; Farooq Ismail; Chris Boulias Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Janne M Veerbeek; Anneli C Langbroek-Amersfoort; Erwin E H van Wegen; Carel G M Meskers; Gert Kwakkel Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2016-09-24 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Sofia Straudi; Giacomo Severini; Marco Da Roit; Laura Di Marco Pizzongolo; Carlotta Martinuzzi; Nino Basaglia Journal: Int J Rehabil Res Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 1.479
Authors: Cristina Rodriguez-de-Pablo; Joel C Perry; Francesca I Cavallaro; Haritz Zabaleta; Thierry Keller Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2012