Maria Ganczak1, Oskar Pasek2, Łukasz Duda-Duma2, Dawid Świstara2, Marcin Korzeń3. 1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Collegium Medicum, Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Zielona Góra, Poland. m.ganczak@cm.uz.zgora.pl. 2. Collegium Medicum, Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Zielona Góra, Poland. 3. Department of Methods of Artificial Intelligence & Applied Mathematics, Westpomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Face masks have been employed in the COVID-19 pandemic plans as a public and personal health control measure against the spread of SARS-CoV-2. In Poland, obligatory wearing of masks in public spaces was introduced on April 10th, 2020; a relaxation of previous universal measures was announced on May 29th, 2020, limiting use to indoor public places. OBJECTIVE: To assess use of masks or other protective devices in public spaces in Poland during the SARS-Cov-2 epidemic. METHODS: A non-participatory covert observational study was conducted on three dates, (10.05/18.05/25.05.2020) at public spaces in 13 regions with different risks. Ten consecutive individuals were observed by each of 82 medical students (n = 2460 observations), using a structured checklist. RESULTS: Among 2353 observed persons, the female/male ratios were 1.0, 1.1, and 1.0 on the three dates. Almost three quarters - 73.6% (n = 552/750) were using masks on date 1, 66.5% (544/818) on date 2; and 65.7% (516/785) on date 3. Cloth masks predominated on all dates (64.7-62.3%-62.6%), followed by medical (23.4-28.5%-26.9%). Being female (OR = 1.77-1.47-1.53 respectively) and location in a closed space (OR = 2.60-2.59-2.32) were each associated with higher usage. Participants in sports were about two times less likely to use masks (OR = 0.64-0.53-0.53) as compared to other activities. The proportion using masks correctly decreased gradually over time (364/552; 65.9%; 339/544; 62.3% and 304/516; 58.9%). More females wore masks correctly (date 1: 205/294; 69.7% vs 159/258; 61.6%, and date 3: 186/284; 65.5% vs 118/232; 50.9%; p = 0.045; p = 0.0008 respectively). Uncovered noses (47.3-52.7%) and masks around the neck (39.2-42.6%) were the most frequent incorrect practices. CONCLUSIONS: Practices were not in line with official recommendations, especially among males, and deteriorated over time. Cloth masks were predominantly used in public spaces. Health promotion, through utilizing all available communication channels, would be helpful to increase compliance.
BACKGROUND: Face masks have been employed in the COVID-19 pandemic plans as a public and personal health control measure against the spread of SARS-CoV-2. In Poland, obligatory wearing of masks in public spaces was introduced on April 10th, 2020; a relaxation of previous universal measures was announced on May 29th, 2020, limiting use to indoor public places. OBJECTIVE: To assess use of masks or other protective devices in public spaces in Poland during the SARS-Cov-2 epidemic. METHODS: A non-participatory covert observational study was conducted on three dates, (10.05/18.05/25.05.2020) at public spaces in 13 regions with different risks. Ten consecutive individuals were observed by each of 82 medical students (n = 2460 observations), using a structured checklist. RESULTS: Among 2353 observed persons, the female/male ratios were 1.0, 1.1, and 1.0 on the three dates. Almost three quarters - 73.6% (n = 552/750) were using masks on date 1, 66.5% (544/818) on date 2; and 65.7% (516/785) on date 3. Cloth masks predominated on all dates (64.7-62.3%-62.6%), followed by medical (23.4-28.5%-26.9%). Being female (OR = 1.77-1.47-1.53 respectively) and location in a closed space (OR = 2.60-2.59-2.32) were each associated with higher usage. Participants in sports were about two times less likely to use masks (OR = 0.64-0.53-0.53) as compared to other activities. The proportion using masks correctly decreased gradually over time (364/552; 65.9%; 339/544; 62.3% and 304/516; 58.9%). More females wore masks correctly (date 1: 205/294; 69.7% vs 159/258; 61.6%, and date 3: 186/284; 65.5% vs 118/232; 50.9%; p = 0.045; p = 0.0008 respectively). Uncovered noses (47.3-52.7%) and masks around the neck (39.2-42.6%) were the most frequent incorrect practices. CONCLUSIONS:Practices were not in line with official recommendations, especially among males, and deteriorated over time. Cloth masks were predominantly used in public spaces. Health promotion, through utilizing all available communication channels, would be helpful to increase compliance.
Entities:
Keywords:
Determinants; Face mask; General population; SARS-Cov-2
Authors: G M Leung; T-H Lam; L-M Ho; S-Y Ho; B H Y Chan; I O L Wong; A J Hedley Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Calistus N Ngonghala; Enahoro Iboi; Steffen Eikenberry; Matthew Scotch; Chandini Raina MacIntyre; Matthew H Bonds; Abba B Gumel Journal: Math Biosci Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 2.144
Authors: Shahul H Ebrahim; Jiatong Zhuo; Ernesto Gozzer; Qanta A Ahmed; Rubina Imtiaz; Yusuf Ahmed; Seydou Doumbia; N M Mujeeb Rahman; Habida Elachola; A Wilder-Smith; Ziad A Memish Journal: Int J Infect Dis Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 3.623
Authors: Habida Elachola; Ernesto Gozzer; N M Mujeeb Rahman; John Ditekemena; Victoria Pando-Robles; Kimsorn Pa; Shahul H Ebrahim Journal: J Travel Med Date: 2020-12-23 Impact factor: 8.490
Authors: Adam J Kucharski; Timothy W Russell; Charlie Diamond; Yang Liu; John Edmunds; Sebastian Funk; Rosalind M Eggo Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2020-03-11 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Adedoyin Oyeyimika Ogunyemi; Adedunni Wumi Olusanya; Adesina Paul Arikawe; Oluwarotimi Bolaji Olopade; Uyiekpen Ima-Edomwonyi; Roland Oluwapelumi Ojo Journal: Pan Afr Med J Date: 2022-06-01
Authors: Sahar Motallebi; Rex C Y Cheung; Babak Mohit; Shahram Shahabi; Amir Alishahi Tabriz; Syamak Moattari Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2021-11-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Róbert Urbán; Borbála Paksi; Ádám Miklósi; John B Saunders; Zsolt Demetrovics Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 3.295