Literature DB >> 33622274

Are Ghanaian women meeting the WHO recommended maternal healthcare (MCH) utilisation? Evidence from a national survey.

Edward Kwabena Ameyaw1, Kwamena Sekyi Dickson2, Kenneth Setorwu Adde2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To achieve the Sustainable Development Goal target 3.1, the World Health Organisation recommends that all pregnant women receive antenatal care (ANC) from skilled providers, utilise the services of a skilled birth attendant at birth and receive their first postnatal care (PNC) within the first 24 h after birth. In this paper, we examined the maternal characteristics that determine utilisation of skilled ANC, skilled birth attendance (SBA), and PNC within the first 24 h after delivery in Ghana.
METHODS: We used data from the 2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey. Women aged 15-49 with birth history not exceeding five before the survey were included in the study. A total of 2839 women were included. Binary logistic regression was employed at a 95% level of significance to determine the association between maternal factors and maternal healthcare (MCH) utilisation. Bivariate and multivariate regression was subsequently used to assess the drivers.
RESULTS: High proportion of women had ANC (93.2%) with skilled providers compared to the proportion that had SBA (76.9%) and PNC within the first 24 h after delivery (25.8%). Only 21.2% utilised all three components of MCH. Women who were covered by national health insurance scheme (NHIS) had a higher likelihood (AOR = 1.31, CI = 1.04 - 1.64) of utilising all three components of MCH as compared to those who were not covered by NHIS. Women with poorer wealth status (AOR = 0.72, CI = 0.53 - 0.97) and those living with partners (AOR = 0.65, CI = 0.49 - 0.86) were less likely to utilise all three MCH components compared to women with poorest wealth status and the married respectively.
CONCLUSION: The realisation that poorer women, those unsubscribed to NHIS and women living with partners have a lower likelihood of utilising the WHO recommended MCH strongly suggest that it is crucial for the Ministry of Health and the Ghana Health Service to take pragmatic steps to increase education about the importance of having ANC with a skilled provider, SBA, and benefits of having the first 24 h recommended PNC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antenatal; Ghana; Maternal healthcare; Postnatal; Public health; Skilled birth

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33622274      PMCID: PMC7903775          DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03643-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth        ISSN: 1471-2393            Impact factor:   3.007


  28 in total

1.  Antenatal care and skilled birth attendance in Bangladesh are influenced by female education and family affordability: BDHS 2014.

Authors:  J Bhowmik; R K Biswas; M Woldegiorgis
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 2.427

2.  Predictors of abortions in Rural Ghana: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  George Adjei; Yeetey Enuameh; Kwaku Poku Asante; Frank Baiden; Obed Ernest A Nettey; Sulemana Abubakari; Emmanuel Mahama; Stephaney Gyaase; Seth Owusu-Agyei
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Women's Health Decision-Making Autonomy and Skilled Birth Attendance in Ghana.

Authors:  Edward Kwabena Ameyaw; Augustine Tanle; Kwaku Kissah-Korsah; Joshua Amo-Adjei
Journal:  Int J Reprod Med       Date:  2016-12-26

4.  Determinants of attending antenatal care at least four times in rural Ghana: analysis of a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Evelyn Sakeah; Sumiyo Okawa; Abraham Rexford Oduro; Akira Shibanuma; Evelyn Ansah; Kimiyo Kikuchi; Margaret Gyapong; Seth Owusu-Agyei; John Williams; Cornelius Debpuur; Francis Yeji; Vida Ami Kukula; Yeetey Enuameh; Gloria Quansah Asare; Enoch Oti Agyekum; Sheila Addai; Doris Sarpong; Kwame Adjei; Charlotte Tawiah; Junko Yasuoka; Keiko Nanishi; Masamine Jimba; Abraham Hodgson
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.640

5.  Determinants of Antenatal Healthcare Utilisation by Pregnant Women in Third Trimester in Peri-Urban Ghana.

Authors:  Jones Asafo Akowuah; Peter Agyei-Baffour; Dadson Awunyo-Vitor
Journal:  J Trop Med       Date:  2018-02-15

6.  Access and utilization of maternal healthcare in a rural district in the forest belt of Ghana.

Authors:  Gladys Buruwaa Nuamah; Peter Agyei-Baffour; Kofi Akohene Mensah; Daniel Boateng; Dan Yedu Quansah; Dominic Dobin; Kwasi Addai-Donkor
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Determinants of utilization of antenatal care services in Benishangul Gumuz Region, Western Ethiopia: a study based on demographic and health survey.

Authors:  Kassahun Tiruaynet; Kindie Fentahun Muchie
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Factors Influencing the Accessibility of Maternal Health Service in Cambodia.

Authors:  Won Ju Hwang; Yeon Mi Park
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Enablers and Barriers to the Utilization of Antenatal Care Services in India.

Authors:  Felix Akpojene Ogbo; Mansi Vijaybhai Dhami; Ebere Maureen Ude; Praween Senanayake; Uchechukwu L Osuagwu; Akorede O Awosemo; Pascal Ogeleka; Blessing Jaka Akombi; Osita Kingsley Ezeh; Kingsley E Agho
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Determinants of choice of skilled antenatal care service providers in Ghana: analysis of demographic and health survey.

Authors:  Kwamena Sekyi Dickson; Eugene Kofuor Maafo Darteh; Akwasi Kumi-Kyereme; Bright Opoku Ahinkorah
Journal:  Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol       Date:  2018-07-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Distance is "a big problem": a geographic analysis of reported and modelled proximity to maternal health services in Ghana.

Authors:  Winfred Dotse-Gborgbortsi; Kristine Nilsen; Anthony Ofosu; Zoë Matthews; Natalia Tejedor-Garavito; Jim Wright; Andrew J Tatem
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.105

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.