Literature DB >> 33621558

A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Thoracolaparoscopic vs Open McKeown's Esophagectomy.

Kexi Wang1, Jian Zhong1, Qianwen Liu2, Peng Lin2, Jianhua Fu3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness and survival benefit of minimally invasive esophagectomy compared to open esophagectomy (OE) remain controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and oncologic outcomes of McKeown's total minimally invasive esophagectomy (tMIE) and McKeown's OE in the treatment of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
METHODS: A series of 917 consecutive patients (306 OE and 611 tMIE) who underwent McKeown's esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2011 to December 2016 were evaluated. We performed propensity matching between the tMIE and OE groups on the basis of estimated propensity scores for each patient.
RESULTS: After propensity-matched analysis, 288 patients were selected from each group. The rate of postoperative complications, such as pneumonia, respiratory insufficiency, cervical anastomotic leakage, and wound infection, in the OE group was significantly higher than that in the tMIE group. Intraoperative blood loss and operative duration were not significantly different between the matched groups, whereas the tMIE group had a shorter length of intensive care unit stay and postoperative hospital stay than the OE group. The R0 resection rate and the number of lymph nodes harvested were not significantly different between groups. There was no significant difference in median overall survival between the 2 groups after matching.
CONCLUSIONS: McKeown's tMIE was shown to be a safe and effective procedure with long-term survival comparable to that of OE for the patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Copyright © 2022 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33621558     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  3 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of robot-assisted versus video-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Dimitrios E Magouliotis; Prokopis-Andreas Zotos; Maria P Fergadi; Despoina Koukousaki; Dimitris Zacharoulis; Alexandros Diamantis; Kyriakos Spiliopoulos; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-08-06

2.  Clinical Effect and Postoperative Pain of Laparo-Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Yue Yu; Yun Han
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Comparison of complications and long-term survival after minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Yu Rong; Yanbing Hao; Jun Xue; Xiaoyuan Li; Qian Li; Li Wang; Tian Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 5.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.