Grzybowski's Generalized Eruptive Keratoacanthomas in a Patient with Terminal Kidney Disease-An Unmet Medical Need Equally Ameliorated by Topical Imiquimod Cream and Lapacho Tea Wraps: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Development of singular keratoacanthoma (KA) is generally considered a benign condition as it has a tendency to regress spontaneously in spite of histological similarity to squamous cell carcinoma. Most KAs undergo excision to rule out differential diagnoses. Several alternative treatment modalities (keratinolytic, ablative, immunomodulating, antiproliferative, or targeted therapy) have been described in the past with varying success, underlining the therapeutic challenges associated with large or multiple lesions. Isomorphic response (Koebner phenomenon) may limit the efficacy of ablative options, and comorbidity may limit the use of systemic treatments. Less aggressive topical immunomodulatory treatment options represent an alternative with varying therapeutic success. CASE REPORT: Here, we describe the clinical course of a 51-year-old male patient with terminal kidney disease who suffered from the rare benign pruritic condition of Grzybowski's generalized eruptive keratoacanthomas (GEKA) and experienced a significant reduction of lesions and symptoms upon topical therapy with imiquimod 5% cream and lapacho tea dressings alike.
CONCLUSIONS: Very little is known about the potential antiinflammatory or antiproliferative effects on the epidermis of the popular phytotherapeutic agent lapacho tea. More studies are warranted considering both the etiology and treatment of GEKA and topical use of phytotherapeutics in dermatology in general. Management of large or multiple KAs remains challenging.

Key Summary Points

Digital Features

This article is published with digital features, including a summary slide, to facilitate understanding of the article. To view digital features for this article go to 10.6084/m9.figshare.13798607.

Introduction

Keratoacanthomas (KA) originate from cells of the hair follicle and normally appear as solitary papules in ultraviolet light-exposed areas of the body of elderly patients. A typical triphasic sequence of rapid growth followed by stabilization and a phase of involution has led to ongoing discussion about potential malignity of these lesions. Although there are distinct histological similarities between KA and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), most authors regard KA as a benign condition. On the contrary, most lesions undergo excision and cases of KA-like SCC have been described [1]. Ultimately, the diagnosis of KA must be established in light of clinical and histological findings as it might resemble a distinctive reactive pattern on grounds of neoplastic or inflammatory conditions including well-differentiated SCCs, viral warts, seborrheic keratoses, and reorganization after trauma. The latter explains an increased prevalence of KA after cosmetic procedures such as laser therapy or chemical peelings [2]. The remaining confusion may lead to both under- and overtreatment and is the topic of ongoing debate.

Multiple and Generalized KA

As opposed to the frequent event of singular lesions, rarely KA develops in large numbers simultaneously or consecutively. Multiple KA can be sporadic or familial and may be divided into distinct subtypes [2]:

Ferguson–Smith type (familial, nonpruritic), also named “multiple self-healing squamous epithelioma”

Grzybowski type (sporadic, pruritic, eruptive, and disseminated), also named “Grzybowski’s Generalized Eruptive Keratoacanthomas (GEKA)”

Witten–Zak type (familial, pruritic)

Localized type (sporadic, pruritic, commonly on the lower legs)

Muir–Torre syndrome (familial, nonpruritic, associated with other neoplasms)

GEKA was first described in 1950 [3], and since then, few cases have been reported in literature. As most descriptions of GEKA affect elderly males, a state of chronic injury or inflammation as well as immunosuppression might contribute to disease development. Other factors associated with eruptive multiple KA include radiation (ultraviolet light, X-ray), trauma, chemical factors (tar), drugs, and foreign bodies [2]. A long follow-up report of the initially described GEKA patient was published in 2002 to point out that there was no malignant transformation in any of the lesions [4]. However, the condition may be associated with visceral malignancies. Nofal et al. proposed the following consistent diagnostic criteria for GEKA [5]: generalized eruption of multiple well-demarcated papules with progressive course, onset in adulthood (most often fifth to seventh decade), lack of family history, typical histopathology, and severe and persistent pruritus. Variable criteria include a masked face, mucosal lesions, crateriform nodules, and ectropion. These criteria generally enable a clear distinction from Ferguson–Smith-type multiple KA, which is not pruritic and typically affects younger patients in familial clusters. The Witten–Zak familial type of multiple KA on the other hand is often found in association with prurigo simplex subacuta [6]. Chronic prurigo may provoke the localized sporadic form typically found on the lower extremities. Some cases of pruritic multiple KA are difficult to classify, though. Of note, genodermatoses such as Muir–Torre syndrome and xeroderma pigmentosum bear a dramatically increased risk for different cutaneous neoplasms, including KA.

As mentioned above, one of the consistent criteria for GEKA is a typical histopathological finding, which includes a characteristic architecture of a central keratin-filled crater surrounded by well-differentiated pale tumor cells with mild atypia and a surrounding inflammatory reaction. Even though typical lesions in GEKA do not show a tendency to transform to SCCs, they impose a therapeutic challenge and dramatically affect the patient’s quality of life.

We briefly describe herein a notable case of GEKA, which responded well to an immunomodulatory topical therapy with imiquimod 5% cream and a phytotherapeutic approach with repetitive lapacho tea dressings. Additionally, we discuss therapeutic alternatives and implications for patient care. We aim to highlight the remaining difficulties in the understanding and practical management of GEKA and KA in general to encourage further studies.

Case Report

The patient consented to submission of the case report to the journal and signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs.

History

A 51-year-old Caucasian male patient first presented to our department in August 2019 with a 10-month history of pruritic papules on sun-exposed areas of his extremities. No prior treatments of these lesions or dermatologic consultations were reported at that time. There was no personal or family history of any type of cancer, including nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC). The patient suffered from severe pruritus with impaired sleep. No history of habitual UV-light exposure or carcinogen exposure such as tar was reported.

The patient had a high cardiovascular risk factor burden and suffered from arterial hypertension, hyperuricemia, coronary heart disease, and terminal kidney disease due to idiopathic nephropathy. He had received kidney transplants in 1990 and 2001 and experienced transplant rejection in 2000 and 2007. Peritoneal dialysis was employed from 2007 to 2017, and ongoing hemodialysis had been started in 2017. Apart from that, he was carrier of a factor V Leiden mutation. The permanent medication consisted of felodipine, bisoprolol, clonidine, ramipril, urapidil, cholecalciferol, acetylsalicylic acid, allopurinol, phenprocoumon, thyroxine, iodine, fluvastatin, calcium acetate, omeprazole, and sevelamer carbonate.

Clinical Picture and Further Investigations

Clinical examination revealed about 100 scaly and ulcerated papules and nodules ranging from 3 to 20 mm dispersed in sun-exposed areas on both upper (Figs. 1, 2) and lower extremities. Signs of chronic actinic damage such as cutis rhomboidalis nuchae, poikiloderma, xerosis cutis, or freckling were absent. Mucosal involvement and lymphadenopathy were excluded.

Fig. 1

Time line of clinical course covering 25 months showing the left arm. Upon first presentation to our department in August 2019, the patient showed several follicular papules and nodular lesions, some with a central horny plug. One month after surgical treatment of 18 lesions, the patient displayed an isomorphic response (Koebner phenomenon) within suture lines. The nodules further progressed without treatment; local therapy with lapacho tea dressings yielded amelioration. UE upper extremities, KA keratoacanthoma

Fig. 2

Time line of clinical course covering 25 months showing the right arm. The lesions further progressed without treatment; local therapy with imiquimod 5% cream yielded amelioration

Tangential biopsies and fusiform excisions of the 18 largest nodules, which were predominantly located on the upper extremities, were conducted as malignancy (SCC) was suspected. Histopathology revealed similar findings in 15 lesions: prominent keratinization, slightly enlarged, hyperchromatic nuclei with abundant amounts of cytoplasm, and moderate atypia. These findings were conclusive with diagnosis of well-differentiated SCC or KA. The remainder was diagnosed as inverted verrucae vulgaris or viral papilloma (Fig. 3). In light of the abundance of skin lesions, we initiated a further diagnostic workup to exclude internal malignancy. Axillar ultrasound revealed diagonally oval configured, presumptively reactive, lymph nodes of less than 1 cm in diameter and no evidence of metastases. Abdominal ultrasound revealed no sign of ascites, hepatosplenomegaly, or advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Nevertheless, thoracic and abdominal CT pointed towards a hepatopathy of unknown origin and revealed numerous further findings, such as a dilated main pulmonary artery hinting at pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a thoracic aortic aneurysm (43 mm) at the pulmonary bifurcation, and generalized extensive vasosclerosis. Apart from that, polycystic and atrophic kidneys were depicted bilaterally, and the pancreatic parenchyma showed multiple signs of calcification. Diffusely increased bone density was detected throughout the volume of the scan, most likely as a result of metabolic abnormalities in light of ongoing hemodialysis. Differential blood count and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis did not detect any abnormalities and ruled out hematologic disease. There was no evidence of hereditary alpha-1 anti-trypsin deficiency given the comorbidity of idiopathic nephropathy, hepatopathy, and PAH. Neither was there any evidence of increased levels of soluble interleukin-2 receptor or rheumatological abnormalities including antinuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA), or anti-smooth muscle antibodies (ASMA). Thorough polymerase chain reaction (PCR)- and aliquot-based low-cost/density (LCD) array testing for human papilloma virus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 42, 44, 45, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 58, 59, 61, 62, 66, 67, 68, 70, 72, 73, 81, 82, 83, 84, 90, and 91 were negative within a sample from a representative lesion.

Fig. 3

Histopathology of representative fusiform excisions. Fifteen excised lesions displayed exophytic and endophytic keratinized masses with epidermal hyperplasia featuring pale cells with mild atypia consistent with keratoacanthoma. a H&E ×2.5 original magnification. b H&E ×10 original magnification. Three lesions showed endophytic growth with reteacanthosis, hypergranulosis, and prominent nucleoli consistent with inverted verruca vulgaris/viral papilloma. c H&E ×2.5 original magnification. d H&E ×10 original magnification

Diagnosis

In accordance with the aforementioned consistent diagnostic criteria, we diagnosed GEKA. None of the variable criteria applied.

Clinical Course

Over the course of 12 months, the patient repeatedly experienced a Koebner phenomenon with development of new pruritic papules and nodules after surgical interventions. Some KA strikingly erupted within suture lines (Figs. 1, 2). Hence, we took a cautious position towards further surgery or ablative measures. While some lesions remained and progressed in size, others resolved over the course of weeks and left pitted scars. Singular lesions were less pruritic than cluster-associated ones.

Possible treatment regimens including systemic retinoids (e.g., acitretin), methotrexate, and cyclophosphamide were discussed. However, given the multimorbidity of the patient and the hepatopathy of unknown origin, we had to dismiss these potentially hepatotoxic treatment options. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effects of lesion-directed therapies. As one of the least invasive options, we favored an off-label therapy with topical imiquimod 5% cream once daily on five continuous days of the week. Additionally, the patient applied lapacho tea dressings for 15–30 min up to three times daily on his own account on lesions on the right arm instead of the prescribed imiquimod cream. Interestingly, both regimens were equally effective in ameliorating the condition; most lesions regressed in size within 6 weeks of topical therapy, while others remained unchanged and none progressed (Figs. 1, 2). The pruritus and sleep could be significantly improved. Fortunately, the diagnosis of GEKA instead of numerous SCC enabled eligibility for kidney transplantation again; hence, the patient is listed once more on the national organ transplant register. Until now, therapy is continued with above-mentioned lesion-directed approach using both imiquimod and lapacho tea dressings; we now advised the patient to use 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 5% cream twice daily for up to 6 weeks on nodules refractory to imiquimod. So far, 5-FU seems to be less effective in these problematic recalcitrant lesions, though. Until February 2021, no further excisions or more invasive approaches were necessary.

Discussion

The biology of KA is still poorly understood, leading to misunderstandings among dermatologists worldwide. KA is both clinically and histologically difficult, and in some cases impossible, to distinguish from well-differentiated cutaneous SCC since they share a variety of diagnostic criteria [7]. This is why KA was dubbed a “clinico-pathologic enigma” [8]. A total of 16 histopathological clues may be used to distinguish KA and SCC, among which more symmetry, epithelial lipping, sharp demarcation between tumor and stroma, and ground-glass appearance as opposed to less ulceration, mitoses, and pleomorphism are the most important [2]. Based on our own experience, intraepithelial abscesses are more commonly seen in KA, although some authors disagree. There are no adequate immunohistochemical markers to enable a clear distinction either. While some pathologists classify KA as its own benign entity and specifically not a malignancy, about 6% of clinically and histologically confirmed singular KA do progress and may show invasive and aggressive behavior like cutaneous SCC [9]. Therefore, high interobserver variability may occur. In some cases of KA, even perineural invasion and an infiltrative growth pattern have been observed. Some authors now consider development of KA as a variable reactive pattern of the skin at the border between benignity and malignancy rather than a specific follicular neoplasm [2]. Taking all these aspects into account and considering grave differential diagnoses such as amelanotic melanoma, complete excision is the safest therapeutic option for singular KA in spite of possible spontaneous regression. On the other hand, GEKA may not be adequately handled by surgery, as illustrated in this case.

GEKA is a rare condition with high disease burden, typically being more pruritic than singular lesions of KA. The papules, nodules, and tumors are widespread and may arise on all parts of the body, including mucosa [10]. The etiology of GEKA remains elusive; however, well-described risk factors include a variety of autoimmune diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren’s syndrome), immunomodulating agents, and hematologic malignant diseases (e.g., multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndrome). An important factor found in this case was severe kidney deficiency and an associated history of immunosuppressive therapies for former kidney transplants. Apart from that, our patient had undergone dialysis at intervals for almost 10 years, and consistently for the past 4 years. Drugs have been repeatedly mentioned as triggers for GEKA; however, considering the multimedication consisting of 15 pharmaceuticals in our patient, the influence of single compounds is impossible to dissect. Interestingly, frequent pharmaceutic triggers include targeted therapies for other cutaneous neoplasms including B-Raf inhibitors (e.g., vemurafenib [11]) and Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (e.g., vismodegib [2]), as well as immune-checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., pembrolizumab [12] and nivolumab [13]). Based on the aforementioned pathogenic factors, including a predisposition for viral papillomas and SCCs, we believe that the eruption of GEKA in our patient followed an event of cutaneous reorganization (e.g., minor trauma). Widespread appearance of skin lesions on the body may also occur in connection with infectious agents such as HPV. The absence of viral material in a representative lesion in our patient is in line with findings of some authors [14], while others identified certain subtypes such as HPV39 in KA [10]. It should be mentioned that even sophisticated molecular laboratory tests may fail to detect HPV, as positivity is often lost in regressing warts. Considering the reactive nature of KA, an initially causative agent might be nondetectable during the regressive phase. Of note, immunocompromised patients also bear a higher risk for other viral and mycotic infectious diseases, which must be considered in the setting of eruptive cutaneous papules (e.g., cryptococcosis, blastomycosis).

Therapeutic options for GEKA are limited and often unsatisfactory and may be divided into topical, intralesional, physical, and systemic therapies (Table 1). Adjunctive treatment with niacin for secondary prevention of NMSC and ideal UV protection may also be employed [15]. Topical keratinolytic therapy using salicylic acid and intralesional measures (i.e., corticosteroids, 5-FU, bleomycin, and interferon-alpha) can prevent excessive scaling and hypertrophic lesions [16, 17]. Cryotherapy, electrodessication, curettage, and dermabrasion are alternatives to repeated surgery and may yield benefits if isomorphic response (Koebner phenomenon) is little [18]. Another modality to consider is photodynamic therapy (PDT) as it is widely available and bears the potential to potently control superficial keratinocytic neoplasms [11]. An invasive approach is the use of electrochemotherapy, which is considered a salvage therapy for locally advanced NMSC or cutaneous metastases [19]. Topical imiquimod is an immune response modifier stimulating inflammatory pathways via activation of toll-like receptors 7 and 8 (TLR7/8) and represents an established treatment option for actinic keratoses and superficial basal cell carcinomas. Therefore, we decided to employ an off-label therapy with a 5% cream formulation five times a week on larger lesions, which achieved satisfactory disease control (Fig. 2). Quite interestingly, the patient’s choice to use lapacho herbal tea phytotherapy was equally effective compared with imiquimod (Fig. 1). Lapacho and its compounds possess both antiinflammatory and antiproliferative qualities. It naturally contains quinine and originates from the inner bark of Tabebuia impetiginosa, a tree native to Central and South America. Its bark is rich in tannins, explaining its widespread use in traditional medicine. Tannins are well-established bactericides, and in vitro evidence suggests promising antiviral, antitumor, and antioncogenic properties [20]. Preclinical data are very limited; however, about 20 years ago, lapacho was named as a potential antipsoriatic drug due to its inhibitory effect on immortalized keratinocytic cell lines [21]. Studies on the potential use of lapacho in the treatment of KA or NMSC deserve further assessment. However, the meaningfulness of our observation might be limited, as other factors including a systemic effect of imiquimod via altered interleukin levels must be taken into account.

Table 1

Overview of potential treatment modalities for large KA or GEKA as mentioned in literature [2, 5, 11, 16–19, 22, 23, 26, 27, 32] or conceivable considering pathophysiology

Mode of application	Therapeutic mode of action	Drug/application	Common dosing	Contraindications and pitfalls
Topical	Keratinolytic	Salicylic acid	1–10% ointments 1–2×/day	Pregnancy, lactation Limited area of use, risk of intoxication is elevated in renal insufficiency
	Immune modifying	Imiquimod	5% cream 3–5×/week for 4–6 weeks 3.75% cream; repetitive daily use for 14 days with 14 days break	Pregnancy, lactation Potential exacerbation of autoimmune diseases (e.g., lupus erythematosus)
		5-Fluorouracil	5% cream 2×/day for 2–6 weeks 5% solution with 10% salicylic acid 1×/day for up to 12 weeks 4% cream 1×/day for 4 weeks	Pregnancy, lactation CAVE: no comedication of brivudin
		(Lapacho tea)	Varying amount of tea used to soak dressings for local application 1–3×/day for 15–30 min; 4–6 weeks	Risk of skin sensitization
Intralesional	Antiinflammatory/antiproliferative	Corticosteroids (triamcinolone acetonide)	10 mg/ml crystal suspension: 0.1–0.2 ml injected per cm2 total dose should not exceed 2 ml	Severe infections, history of extensive psoriasis, active peptic ulcer disease, uncontrolled diabetes, heart failure, severe arterial hypertension, depression, psychosis
		Interferon alpha	Three million IE in 1 ml intralesionally 1×/week for 5–8 weeks	Depression, exacerbation of autoimmune diseases, flu-like symptoms
	Cytostatic	Bleomycin	1 mg/ml diluted to 1 U/ml in saline or 1% lidocaine	Pregnancy, lactation, Raynaud phenomenon, peripheral vascular disease, connective tissue disease Monitoring of total dosing to avoid cumulative toxicity
		5-Fluorouracil	50 mg/ml 1×/week	Pregnancy, lactation, bone marrow suppression CAVE: no comedication of brivudin
		Methotrexate	20 mg for lesions < 2 cm diameter; 25 mg for lesions > 2 cm diameter	Pregnancy, lactation, CAVE: severe renal and hepatic dysfunction, leukopenia
		Electrochemotherapy	Intralesional or intravenous bleomycin/cisplatin combined with electric impulses, dose of drugs depends on size and number of target lesions	Pregnancy, lactation, bleeding disorders, cumulative high doses of bleomycin, lung fibrosis, terminal renal insufficiency Painful procedure
Photodynamic therapy	Photophysical	5-Aminolevulinic acid or methyl aminolevulinate	Curettage of hyperkeratoses followed by 3 h incubation of the photosensitizer and red light activation (200 J), repetitive sessions necessary Daylight photodynamic therapy (?)	Few contraindications including porphyria or allergy to the used sensitizer
Physical measures	Destructive	Cryotherapy	Target temperature: −50 °C for 10–15 s with > 5 mm margin; Two freeze–thaw cycles per treatment	Cryoglobulinemia, multiple myeloma, Raynaud disease, cold urticaria, vascular impairment in treated area
		Dermabrasion	Depending on size of target lesion	Current viral infections (human papilloma virus, herpes simplex virus, varicella zoster virus), psoriasis, vascular lesions
		Electrodessication and curettage	Depending on size of target lesion	Presence of implanted electrical devices, critical anatomical locations (proximity to eyes, fingers, scrotum)
Radiotherapy	Conventional radiotherapy	Electrons, photons	Various fractionated protocols for palliative management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma	Pregnancy, lactation, connective tissue disease, lung fibrosis Risk of induction of neoplasms
	Brachytherapy	Special catheters are used to locally administer radiation	Various protocols may be used (high dose rate, pulsed dose rate, low dose rate)	Pregnancy, lactation Risk of induction of neoplasms
Systemic treatment	Antiproliferative	Acitretin	10–75 mg/day p.o. for induction 30–50 mg/day p.o. for maintenance	Pregnancy, lactation Women of childbearing potential must reassure safe contraception Severe hepatic dysfunction and dyslipidemia
	Immune modifying	Methotrexate	12.5–25 mg p.o/s.c	Pregnancy, lactation CAVE: severe renal and hepatic dysfunction, leukopenia
		Cyclophosphamide	50–100 mg/day p.o Pulses of 1 g/month i.v. for 6 months	Pregnancy, lactation CAVE:bone marrow suppression, risk of infections
		Cyclosporine	100–200 mg/day p.o	CAVE: renal and hepatic dysfunction, arterial hypertension, interactions with numerous other drugs, risk of infections
	Immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD1 inhibitors)	Pembrolizumab	200 mg i.v. q3w or 400 mg i.v. q6w	Pregnancy, lactation, severe autoimmune disease Close monitoring for immune-related adverse events CAVE: case reports about the induction of GEKA via checkpoint inhibitors (!)
		Nivolumab	240 mg i.v. q2w or 480 mg i.v. q4w	See pembrolizumab
		Cemiplimab	350 mg i.v. q3w	See pembrolizumab
	Targeted therapy (EGFR inhibitors)	Cetuximab	Initial dose of 400 mg/m2 body surface i.v. followed by weekly 250 mg/m2 body surface i.v	Pregnancy, lactation Severe pulmonary and cardiovascular comorbidity Class dependent side effects for all EGFR inhibitors include acneiform eruptions
		Erlotinib	150 mg/day p.o.	See cetuximab

Note that some of these treatment options are better suited to singular extensive lesions and represent a rather theoretical approach for GEKA. Also note that immune checkpoint inhibition, which has evolved as a treatment of choice for different advanced skin cancers, has been reported repeatedly to paradoxically trigger eruptive KA; this restricts imprudent use [12, 13]

EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor, PD1 programmed cell death protein 1

Development of “true” SCC among the multitude of KA must be considered. Singular progressive lesions may demand more aggressive therapeutic regimens. Radiotherapy remains a salvage option for progressive extensive tumors ineligible to surgery [22, 23]. Systemic therapeutic agents including retinoids [24], methotrexate, and cyclophosphamide have repeatedly been named as successful treatment options, but not all patients are suitable [25]. Given the pruritic nature of GEKA, a therapeutic attempt with cyclosporine alone or in combination might be justified based on experiences of the treatment of chronic prurigo and prurigo-associated sporadic localized type of multiple KA [26]. When considering the similarity of KA and SCC, treatment attempts with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors (e.g., cetuximab) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., cemiplimab) seem likely [27]. However, as mentioned above, there are reports of GEKA paradoxically triggered by programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) inhibitors pembrolizumab and nivolumab [12, 13]. This reaction might be explained via an enhanced skin-directed Th1-cell response resulting in hyperproliferation comparable to a psoriasiform reaction (immune-related adverse event). One of the most often observed adverse reaction to PD1 inhibitors is severe pruritic lichenoid dermatitis [28]. Therefore, it might be counterproductive to use immune-checkpoint-inhibitors for treatment of GEKA as an already established lymphocytic inflammatory reaction might be further enhanced and yield even more epithelial proliferation and pruritus. Caution and better understanding of the underlying biological processes would be necessary to justify a therapeutic attempt of these new drugs. Interestingly though, there are also reports of exacerbations of multiple KA in the course of many of the aforementioned therapeutic approaches including topical immunomodulation with imiquimod [29]. These events are most probably attributable to pronounced isomorphic responses and highlight the remaining difficulties in management of the condition.

Conclusions

Given the clinically observed course of disease in our patient, GEKA can be considered a rare complication in chronic kidney disease, in which preventive measures and state-of-the-art therapeutic strategies fail to achieve disease control in a satisfactory fashion [30, 31]. A tailored approach must include local, physical, and systemic treatments for existing lesions and integrate preventive measures to impair development of new lesions. Interestingly, lapacho tea dressings were equally effective as imiquimod 5% cream, which should be noted as a well-tolerated phytotherapeutic approach with little or no side effects. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there are no previous reports of the use of lapacho tea for treatment of KA. Future studies are warranted to further elucidate the impact of lapacho compounds and its local effects on keratinocytes to potentially broaden the therapeutic armamentarium in conditions defined by reactive epithelial hyperproliferation.

Grzybowski’s generalized eruptive keratoacanthomas (GEKA) is a rare benign pruritic condition.

Predisposing factors include severe renal insufficiency, immunosuppression, and specific drugs.

Potential therapeutic modalities include keratinolytic, ablative, immunomodulatory, antiproliferative, and targeted therapy.

Caution must be exercised not to miss cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and visceral malignancies in these patients.

Lapacho tea bears antiinflammatory and antiproliferative potential which deserves further scientific attention.