Literature DB >> 33620577

Complete hemogram: simple and cost-effective in staging and predicting outcome in acute pancreatitis.

Parmeshwar Ramesh Junare1, Prasanta Debnath2, Sujit Nair2, Sanjay Chandnani2, Suhas Udgirkar2, Ravi Thange2, Shubham Jain2, Rahul Deshmukh2, Partha Debnath2, Pravin Rathi2, Qais Contractor2, Akshay Deshpande3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An important goal in management of acute pancreatitis (AP) is early prediction and recognition of disease severity. Various predictive scoring systems are in clinical use with their own limitations and there is always a quest for simple, practical, quantifiable, dynamic and readily available markers for predicting disease severity and outcome. Complete hemogram is routinely ordered in all patients with AP. In recent years red cell distribution width (RDW), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been found to be independent predictors of prognosis in various benign and malignant conditions. This prospective study evaluated complete hemogram based markers in AP.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Complete hemogram analysis was done and NLR, LMR, PLR values were calculated. Development of organ failure, the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission and interventions, development of complications (local/systemic) and 100-day mortality were assessed.
RESULTS: In this study 160 subjects of AP were included. Complete hemogram analysis was performed within 24 h after admission. C‑reactive protein, RDW, NLR, PLR and bedside index of severity in acute pancreatitis (BISAP) values were higher in severe AP than moderate AP group than mild AP group, while LMR values were decreased in the corresponding severe, moderate and mild AP groups (p < 0.001). The NLR performed best for prediction of ICU admission, organ failure, interventions and mortality with area under receiver operating curve (AUROC) were 0.943, 0.940, 0.902 and 0.910, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Hemogram based markers are simple, objective, dynamic and readily available. They can be considered in addition to conventional multifactorial scoring systems for prediction of outcome and prognosis of AP.
© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH, AT part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute pancreatitis; BISAP score; NLR; Organ failure; RDW

Year:  2021        PMID: 33620577     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-021-01821-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  46 in total

Review 1.  Acute pancreatitis: bench to the bedside.

Authors:  Stephen J Pandol; Ashok K Saluja; Clement W Imrie; Peter A Banks
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Preoperative platelet-lymphocyte ratio is an independent significant prognostic marker in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Richard A Smith; Lorraine Bosonnet; Michael Raraty; Robert Sutton; John P Neoptolemos; Fiona Campbell; Paula Ghaneh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Procalcitonin is a predictive marker for severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Nurullah Bülbüller; Osman Doğru; Refik Ayten; Handan Akbulut; Yavuz Selim Ilhan; Ziya Cetinkaya
Journal:  Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2006-04

Review 4.  The Atlanta Classification of acute pancreatitis revisited.

Authors:  T L Bollen; H C van Santvoort; M G Besselink; M S van Leeuwen; K D Horvath; P C Freeny; H G Gooszen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992.

Authors:  E L Bradley
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-05

Review 6.  Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  E J Balthazar; P C Freeny; E vanSonnenberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus.

Authors:  Peter A Banks; Thomas L Bollen; Christos Dervenis; Hein G Gooszen; Colin D Johnson; Michael G Sarr; Gregory G Tsiotos; Santhi Swaroop Vege
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.

Authors:  L Chen; Y Lou; Y Chen; J Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Red cell distribution width improves the simplified acute physiology score for risk prediction in unselected critically ill patients.

Authors:  Sabina Hunziker; Leo A Celi; Joon Lee; Michael D Howell
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Prognostic value of peripheral blood lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in patients with solid tumors: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Jie Teng; Jian Zhang; Tian-Yi Zhang; Shu Zhang; Bao-Sheng Li
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.