Literature DB >> 33620321

A Web-Based Computer-Tailored Program to Improve Treatment Adherence in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Stan Vluggen1, Math Candel2, Ciska Hoving1, Nicolaas C Schaper3, Hein de Vries1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adherence to core type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatment behaviors is suboptimal, and nonadherence is generally not limited to one treatment behavior. The internet holds promise for programs that aim to improve adherence. We developed a computer-tailored eHealth program for patients with T2DM to improve their treatment adherence, that is, adherence to both a healthy lifestyle and medical behaviors.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine the effectiveness of the eHealth program in a randomized controlled trial.
METHODS: Patients with T2DM were recruited by their health professionals and randomized into either the intervention group, that is, access to the eHealth program for 6 months, or a waiting-list control group. In total, 478 participants completed the baseline questionnaire, of which 234 gained access to the eHealth program. Of the 478 participants, 323 were male and 155 were female, the mean age was 60 years, and the participants had unfavorable BMI and HbA1c levels on average. Outcome data were collected through web-based assessments on physical activity (PA) levels, caloric intake from unhealthy snacks, and adherence to oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) and insulin therapy. Changes to separate behaviors were standardized and summed into a composite change score representing changes in the overall treatment adherence. Further standardization of this composite change score yielded the primary outcome, which can be interpreted as Cohen d (effect size). Standardized change scores observed in separate behaviors acted as secondary outcomes. Mixed linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the effectiveness of the intervention on overall and separate treatment behavior adherence, accommodating relevant covariates and patient nesting.
RESULTS: After the 6-month follow-up assessment, 47.4% (111/234) of participants in the intervention group and 72.5% (177/244) of participants in the control group were retained. The overall treatment adherence improved significantly in the intervention group compared with the control group, reflected by a small effect size (d=0.27; 95% CI 0.032 to 0.509; P=.03). When considering changes in separate treatment behaviors, a significant decrease was observed only in caloric intake from unhealthy snacks in comparison with the control group (d=0.36; 95% CI 0.136 to 0.584; P=.002). For adherence to PA (d=-0.14; 95% CI -0.388 to 0.109; P=.27), OHAs (d=0.27; 95% CI -0.027 to 0.457; P=.08), and insulin therapy (d=0.35; 95% CI -0.066 to 0.773; P=.10), no significant changes were observed. These results from the unadjusted analyses were comparable with the results of the adjusted analyses, the per-protocol analyses, and the sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Our multibehavior program significantly improved the overall treatment adherence compared with the control group. To further enhance the impact of the intervention in the personal, societal, and economic areas, a wide-scale implementation of our eHealth intervention is suggested. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NL664; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6664. ©Stan Vluggen, Math Candel, Ciska Hoving, Nicolaas C Schaper, Hein de Vries. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 23.02.2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computer-tailoring; eHealth; randomized controlled trial; treatment adherence; type 2 diabetes mellitus

Year:  2021        PMID: 33620321      PMCID: PMC7943340          DOI: 10.2196/18524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Internet Res        ISSN: 1438-8871            Impact factor:   5.428


  71 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of selected interventions for worksite health promotion. The assessment of health risks with feedback.

Authors:  Robin E Soler; Kimberly D Leeks; Sima Razi; David P Hopkins; Matt Griffith; Adam Aten; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; Susan C Smith; Nancy Habarta; Ron Z Goetzel; Nicolaas P Pronk; Dennis E Richling; Deborah R Bauer; Leigh Ramsey Buchanan; Curtis S Florence; Lisa Koonin; Debbie MacLean; Abby Rosenthal; Dyann Matson Koffman; James V Grizzell; Andrew M Walker
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 2.  Web-based interventions for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of recent evidence.

Authors:  A Ramadas; K F Quek; C K Y Chan; B Oldenburg
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change.

Authors:  J O Prochaska; C C DiClemente
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1983-06

4.  Exploring beliefs on diabetes treatment adherence among Dutch type 2 diabetes patients and healthcare providers.

Authors:  S Vluggen; C Hoving; N C Schaper; H de Vries
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-07-12

Review 5.  A systematic literature review of methodologies used to assess medication adherence in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Sarah Clifford; Magaly Perez-Nieves; Anne M Skalicky; Matthew Reaney; Karin S Coyne
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.580

6.  Effective interventions to improve medication adherence in Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joni L Strom Williams; Rebekah J Walker; Brittany L Smalls; Jennifer A Campbell; Leonard E Egede
Journal:  Diabetes Manag (Lond)       Date:  2014-01-01

Review 7.  Why are health care interventions delivered over the internet? A systematic review of the published literature.

Authors:  Frances Griffiths; Antje Lindenmeyer; John Powell; Pam Lowe; Margaret Thorogood
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Exploratory randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of a waiting list control design.

Authors:  John A Cunningham; Kypros Kypri; Jim McCambridge
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  The Diabetes Pearl: Diabetes biobanking in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Esther van't Riet; Miranda T Schram; Evertine J Abbink; Wanda M Admiraal; Marja W Dijk-Schaap; Frits Holleman; Giel Nijpels; Behiye Özcan; Hanno Pijl; Nicolaas C Schaper; Eric J G Sijbrands; Bianca Silvius; Cees J Tack; Harold W de Valk; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel; Coen D A Stehouwer; Jacqueline M Dekker
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  A Fully Automated Web-Based Program Improves Lifestyle Habits and HbA1c in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Abdominal Obesity: Randomized Trial of Patient E-Coaching Nutritional Support (The ANODE Study).

Authors:  Boris Hansel; Philippe Giral; Laetitia Gambotti; Alexandre Lafourcade; Gilbert Peres; Claude Filipecki; Diana Kadouch; Agnes Hartemann; Jean-Michel Oppert; Eric Bruckert; Michel Marre; Arnaud Bruneel; Emilie Duchene; Ronan Roussel
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  1 in total

1.  Perceptions of Dutch general practitioners towards eHealth for patients with type-2 diabetes: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lieve Vonken; Hani Hussein; Rik Crutzen; Stan Vluggen
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 2.290

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.