OBJECTIVE: To investigate variation of the pelvis in unilateral Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and analyze the reliability of pelvic landmarks. METHODS: We retrospectively received preoperative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs for 89 adult patients with unilateral Crowe type IV DDH at our institution between September 2008 and May 2019. Forty-eight patients without a false acetabulum was type IVA and 41 with a false acetabulum was type IVB. The heights of the ilium, acetabulum, and ischium areas in affected and unaffected sides were measured. The ratios of the three areas in entire pelvis are calculated. The discrepancies of bilateral iliac crest, inferior sacroiliac articulation, teardrop, and ischial tuberosity on the bisector of the pelvis were also measured. RESULTS: The mean heights of the ilium, acetabulum, ischium areas in the affected side were 74.4, 88.6, and 37.0 mm, respectively, in type IVA group and 77.7, 83.5, and 37.8 mm, respectively, in type IVB group. The heights in the unaffected side were 82.1, 84.6, and 43.8 mm, respectively, in type IVA group and 84.6, 82.0, and 44.0 mm, respectively, in type IVB group. The ratios of the ilium, acetabulum, ischium areas in affected side of Crowe type IVA group were 0.37, 0.44, and 0.19, respectively, and the ratios in unaffected side were 0.39, 0.40, and 0.21, respectively. The ratios in affected side of Crowe type IVB group were 0.39, 0.42, and 0.19, respectively, and the ratios in unaffected side were 0.40, 0.39, and 0.21, respectively. The discrepancies of bilateral iliac crest, inferior sacroiliac articulation, teardrop, and ischial tuberosity on the line of the bisector of the pelvis in Crowe type IVA group were 5.6, 5.2, 2.0, and 7.1 mm, respectively. Those in Crowe type IVB group were 8.1, 3.5, 3.5, and 4.9 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic asymmetry was a common occurrence in unilateral Crowe type IV DDH in adults. Furthermore, it should be reliable to use teardrop as pelvic landmark to balance leg length discrepancy in preoperative planning.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate variation of the pelvis in unilateral Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and analyze the reliability of pelvic landmarks. METHODS: We retrospectively received preoperative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs for 89 adult patients with unilateral Crowe type IV DDH at our institution between September 2008 and May 2019. Forty-eight patients without a false acetabulum was type IVA and 41 with a false acetabulum was type IVB. The heights of the ilium, acetabulum, and ischium areas in affected and unaffected sides were measured. The ratios of the three areas in entire pelvis are calculated. The discrepancies of bilateral iliac crest, inferior sacroiliac articulation, teardrop, and ischial tuberosity on the bisector of the pelvis were also measured. RESULTS: The mean heights of the ilium, acetabulum, ischium areas in the affected side were 74.4, 88.6, and 37.0 mm, respectively, in type IVA group and 77.7, 83.5, and 37.8 mm, respectively, in type IVB group. The heights in the unaffected side were 82.1, 84.6, and 43.8 mm, respectively, in type IVA group and 84.6, 82.0, and 44.0 mm, respectively, in type IVB group. The ratios of the ilium, acetabulum, ischium areas in affected side of Crowe type IVA group were 0.37, 0.44, and 0.19, respectively, and the ratios in unaffected side were 0.39, 0.40, and 0.21, respectively. The ratios in affected side of Crowe type IVB group were 0.39, 0.42, and 0.19, respectively, and the ratios in unaffected side were 0.40, 0.39, and 0.21, respectively. The discrepancies of bilateral iliac crest, inferior sacroiliac articulation, teardrop, and ischial tuberosity on the line of the bisector of the pelvis in Crowe type IVA group were 5.6, 5.2, 2.0, and 7.1 mm, respectively. Those in Crowe type IVB group were 8.1, 3.5, 3.5, and 4.9 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic asymmetry was a common occurrence in unilateral Crowe type IV DDH in adults. Furthermore, it should be reliable to use teardrop as pelvic landmark to balance leg length discrepancy in preoperative planning.