Literature DB >> 33619694

Mixed effects modeling of Morris water maze data revisited: Bayesian censored regression.

Michael E Young1, Michael R Hoane2.   

Abstract

Young, Clark, Goffus, and Hoane (Learning and Motivation, 40(2), 160-177, 2009) documented significant advantages of linear and nonlinear mixed-effects modeling in the analysis of Morris water maze data. However, they also noted a caution regarding the impact of the common practice of ending a trial when the rat had not reached the platform by a preestablished deadline. The present study revisits their conclusions by considering a new approach that involves multilevel (i.e., mixed effects) censored generalized linear regression using Bayesian analysis. A censored regression explicitly models the censoring created by prematurely ending a trial, and the use of generalized linear regression incorporates the skewed distribution of latency data as well as the nonlinear relationships this can produce. This approach is contrasted with a standard multilevel linear and nonlinear regression using two case studies. The censored generalized linear regression better models the observed relationships, but the linear regression created mixed results and clearly resulted in model misspecification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian analysis; Censored regression; Data analysis; Memory; Morris water maze

Year:  2021        PMID: 33619694     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-020-00457-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  5 in total

1.  The problem with categorical thinking by psychologists.

Authors:  Michael E Young
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Bayesian data analysis as a tool for behavior analysts.

Authors:  Michael E Young
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  An overview of Bayesian reasoning in the analysis of delay-discounting data.

Authors:  Christopher T Franck; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Todd L McKerchar; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Discounting: A practical guide to multilevel analysis of indifference data.

Authors:  Michael E Young
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A solution to dependency: using multilevel analysis to accommodate nested data.

Authors:  Emmeke Aarts; Matthijs Verhage; Jesse V Veenvliet; Conor V Dolan; Sophie van der Sluis
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 24.884

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.