Literature DB >> 33619678

Early rescue oocyte activation for activation-impaired oocytes with no second polar body extrusion after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Takashi Shibahara1, Yuu Fukasaku2, Naoko Hayashi2, Nozomi Miyazaki2, Hiroaki Kawato3, Hiroyuki Minoura2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: When rescue artificial oocyte activation (ROA) is performed on the day after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) or later, embryonic development is poor and seldom results in live births. The efficacy of an early ROA after ICSI is unclear. Is early ROA effective in rescuing unfertilized oocytes that have not undergone second polar body extrusion several hours after ICSI?
METHODS: We performed retrospective cohort study between October 2016 and September 2019, targeting 2891 oocytes in 843 cycles when ICSI was performed. We performed ROA with calcium ionophore on 395 of the 475 oocytes with no second polar extrusion 2.5-6 h after ICSI.
RESULTS: The normal fertilization rate of ROA oocytes was significantly higher than non-ROA oocytes (65.8% vs 6.7%, P < 0.001). The blastocyst development rate in ROA oocytes was significantly lower than spontaneously activated oocytes (48.9% vs 67.2%, P < 0.001). The ROA oocyte implantation rate did not significantly differ from the spontaneously activated oocytes (36.0% vs 41.2%). We observed no differences in the implantation rates and blastocyst development rates over the 2.5-6 h from ICSI until ROA.
CONCLUSION: Early ROA is effective, and the optimal timing appears to be 2.5-6 h after ICSI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial oocyte activation; Calcium ionophore; Inactivated oocytes; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Second polar body

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33619678      PMCID: PMC8190240          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02089-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  19 in total

1.  A live birth of activated one-day-old unfertilized oocyte for a patient who experienced repeatedly near-total fertilization failure after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Qun Lu; Xi Chen; Yang Li; Xiao-Hong Zhang; Rong Liang; Yong-Ping Zhao; Li-Hui Wei; Huan Shen
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 2.  Assisted oocyte activation following ICSI fertilization failure.

Authors:  Frauke Vanden Meerschaut; Dimitra Nikiforaki; Björn Heindryckx; Petra De Sutter
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.828

3.  Correlation between oocyte preincubation time and pregnancy rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Patrizia Falcone; Laura Gambera; Manuela Pisoni; Vincenzo Lofiego; Vincenzo De Leo; Luca Mencaglia; Paola Piomboni
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.260

4.  Influence of oocyte preincubation time on fertilization after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  K Yanagida; H Yazawa; H Katayose; K Suzuki; K Hoshi; A Sato
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Premature chromosome condensation of the sperm nucleus after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  H Schmiady; A Tandler-Schneider; H Kentenich
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Does the use of calcium ionophore during artificial oocyte activation demonstrate an effect on pregnancy rate? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sughashini Murugesu; Srdjan Saso; Benjamin P Jones; Timothy Bracewell-Milnes; Thanos Athanasiou; Anastasia Mania; Paul Serhal; Jara Ben-Nagi
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer.

Authors:  D K Gardner; M Lane; J Stevens; T Schlenker; W B Schoolcraft
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Analysis of intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedures related to delayed insemination and ejaculated, epididymal and testicular spermatozoa.

Authors:  M M Andrews; S B Fishel; P H Rowe; J A Berry; F Lisi; L Rinaldi
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.828

9.  Can calcium ionophore "use" in patients with diminished ovarian reserve increase fertilization and pregnancy rates? A randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Pinar Caglar Aytac; Esra Bulgan Kilicdag; Bulent Haydardedeoglu; Erhan Simsek; Tayfun Cok; Huriye Ayse Parlakgumus
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Artificial oocyte activation with calcium ionophore does not cause a widespread increase in chromosome segregation errors in the second meiotic division of the oocyte.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Christian S Ottolini; Darren K Griffin; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Alan H Handyside; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ionophore application for artificial oocyte activation and its potential effect on morphokinetics: a sibling oocyte study.

Authors:  Omar Shebl; Philip Sebastian Trautner; Sabine Enengl; Elisabeth Reiter; Christina Allerstorfer; Tamara Rechberger; Peter Oppelt; Thomas Ebner
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 3.412

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.