Literature DB >> 33619291

Evaluation of Antarctic Ozone Profiles derived from OMPS-LP by using Balloon-borne Ozonesondes.

Edgardo Sepúlveda1, Raul R Cordero2, Alessandro Damiani3, Sarah Feron4,5, Jaime Pizarro1, Felix Zamorano6, Rigel Kivi7, Ricardo Sánchez8, Margarita Yela9, Julien Jumelet10, Alejandro Godoy8, Jorge Carrasco6, Juan S Crespo11, Gunther Seckmeyer12, Jose A Jorquera1, Juan M Carrera1, Braulio Valdevenito1, Sergio Cabrera13, Alberto Redondas14, Penny M Rowe1,15.   

Abstract

Predicting radiative forcing due to Antarctic stratospheric ozone recovery requires detecting changes in the ozone vertical distribution. In this endeavor, the Limb Profiler of the Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS-LP), aboard the Suomi NPP satellite, has played a key role providing ozone profiles over Antarctica since 2011. Here, we compare ozone profiles derived from OMPS-LP data (version 2.5 algorithm) with balloon-borne ozonesondes launched from 8 Antarctic stations over the period 2012-2020. Comparisons focus on the layer from 12.5 to 27.5 km and include ozone profiles retrieved during the Sudden Stratospheric Warming (SSW) event registered in Spring 2019. We found that, over the period December-January-February-March, the root mean square error (RMSE) tends to be larger (about 20%) in the lower stratosphere (12.5-17.5 km) and smaller (about 10%) within higher layers (17.5-27.5 km). During the ozone hole season (September-October-November), RMSE values rise up to 40% within the layer from 12.5 to 22 km. Nevertheless, relative to balloon-borne measurements, the mean bias error of OMPS-derived Antarctic ozone profiles is generally lower than 0.3 ppmv, regardless of the season.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33619291      PMCID: PMC7900121          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81954-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of the Gauss-Seidel spherical polarized radiative transfer code with other radiative transfer codes.

Authors:  B M Herman; T R Caudill; D E Flittner; K J Thome; A Ben-David
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1995-07-20       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  Emergence of healing in the Antarctic ozone layer.

Authors:  Susan Solomon; Diane J Ivy; Doug Kinnison; Michael J Mills; Ryan R Neely; Anja Schmidt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The MERRA-2 Aerosol Reanalysis, 1980 - onward, Part I: System Description and Data Assimilation Evaluation.

Authors:  C A Randles; A M Da Silva; V Buchard; P R Colarco; A Darmenov; R Govindaraju; A Smirnov; B Holben; R Ferrare; J Hair; Y Shinozuka; C J Flynn
Journal:  J Clim       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 5.148

4.  Success of Montreal Protocol Demonstrated by Comparing High-Quality UV Measurements with "World Avoided" Calculations from Two Chemistry-Climate Models.

Authors:  Richard McKenzie; Germar Bernhard; Ben Liley; Patrick Disterhoft; Steve Rhodes; Alkiviadis Bais; Olaf Morgenstern; Paul Newman; Luke Oman; Colette Brogniez; Stana Simic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  UV irradiance and albedo at Union Glacier Camp (Antarctica): a case study.

Authors:  Raul R Cordero; Alessandro Damiani; Jorge Ferrer; Jose Jorquera; Mario Tobar; Fernando Labbe; Jorge Carrasco; David Laroze
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Persistent extreme ultraviolet irradiance in Antarctica despite the ozone recovery onset.

Authors:  Raúl R Cordero; Sarah Feron; Alessandro Damiani; Alberto Redondas; Jorge Carrasco; Edgardo Sepúlveda; Jose Jorquera; Francisco Fernandoy; Pedro Llanillo; Penny M Rowe; Gunther Seckmeyer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.