Liao Ouyang1,2, Bo Thamdrup3, Mark Trimmer4. 1. College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China. 2. School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK. 3. Nordcee, Department of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, 5230, Odense M, Denmark. 4. School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK. m.trimmer@qmul.ac.uk.
Abstract
The coupling between nitrification and N2 gas production to recycle ammonia back to the atmosphere is a key step in the nitrogen cycle that has been researched widely. An assumption for such research is that the products of nitrification (nitrite or nitrate) mix freely in the environment before reduction to N2 gas. Here we show, in oxic riverbeds, that the pattern of N2 gas production from ammonia deviates by ~3- to 16-fold from that predicted for denitrification or anammox involving nitrite or nitrate as free porewater intermediates. Rather, the patterns match that for a coupling through a cryptic pool, isolated from the porewater. A cryptic pool challenges our understanding of a key step in the nitrogen cycle and masks our ability to distinguish between sources of N2 gas that 20 years' research has sought to identify. Our reasoning suggests a new pathway or a new type of coupling between known pathways in the nitrogen cycle.
The coupling between nitrification and N2 gas production to recycle n class="Chemical">ammonia back to the atmosphere is a key step in the nitrogen cycle that has been researched widely. An assumption for such research is that the products of nitrification (nitrite or nitrate) mix freely in the environment before reduction to N2 gas. Here we show, in oxic riverbeds, that the pattern of N2 gas production from ammonia deviates by ~3- to 16-fold from that predicted for denitrification or anammox involving nitrite or nitrate as free porewater intermediates. Rather, the patterns match that for a coupling through a cryptic pool, isolated from the porewater. A cryptic pool challenges our understanding of a key step in the nitrogen cycle and masks our ability to distinguish between sources of N2 gas that 20 years' research has sought to identify. Our reasoning suggests a new pathway or a new type of coupling between known pathways in the nitrogen cycle.
Authors: S Seitzinger; J A Harrison; J K Böhlke; A F Bouwman; R Lowrance; B Peterson; C Tobias; G Van Drecht Journal: Ecol Appl Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.657
Authors: Patrick J Mulholland; Ashley M Helton; Geoffrey C Poole; Robert O Hall; Stephen K Hamilton; Bruce J Peterson; Jennifer L Tank; Linda R Ashkenas; Lee W Cooper; Clifford N Dahm; Walter K Dodds; Stuart E G Findlay; Stanley V Gregory; Nancy B Grimm; Sherri L Johnson; William H McDowell; Judy L Meyer; H Maurice Valett; Jackson R Webster; Clay P Arango; Jake J Beaulieu; Melody J Bernot; Amy J Burgin; Chelsea L Crenshaw; Laura T Johnson; B R Niederlehner; Jonathan M O'Brien; Jody D Potter; Richard W Sheibley; Daniel J Sobota; Suzanne M Thomas Journal: Nature Date: 2008-03-13 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: A A van de Graaf; A Mulder; P de Bruijn; M S Jetten; L A Robertson; J G Kuenen Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 1995-04 Impact factor: 4.792