Literature DB >> 33619173

Masticatory system integration in a commensal canid: interrelationships between bones, muscles and bite force in the red fox.

Colline Brassard1,2, Marilaine Merlin3, Elodie Monchâtre-Leroy4, Claude Guintard5,6, Jacques Barrat4, Hélène Garès7, Arnaud Larralle8, Raymond Triquet9, Céline Houssin10, Cécile Callou3, Raphaël Cornette10, Anthony Herrel3.   

Abstract

The jaw system in canids is essential for defence and prey acquisition. However, how it varies in wild species in comparison with domestic species remains poorly understood, yet is of interest in terms of understanding the impact of artificial selection. Here, we explored the variability and interrelationships between the upper and lower jaws, muscle architecture and bite force in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). We performed dissections and used 3D geometric morphometric approaches to quantify jaw shape in 68 foxes. We used a static lever model and bite force estimates were compared with in vivo measurements of 10 silver foxes. Our results show strong relationships exist between cranial and mandible shape, and between cranial or mandible shape on the one hand and muscles or estimated bite force on the other hand, confirming the strong integration of the bony and muscular components of the jaw system. These strong relationships are strongly driven by size. The functional links between shape and estimated bite force are stronger for the mandible, which probably reflects its greater specialisation towards biting. We then compared our results with data previously obtained for dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) to investigate the effect of domestication. Foxes and dogs differ in skull shape and muscle physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA). They show a similar amount of morphological variation in muscle PCSA, but foxes show lower variation in cranial and mandible shape. Interestingly, the patterns of covariation are not stronger in foxes than in dogs, suggesting that domestication did not lead to a disruption of the functional links of the jaw system.
© 2021. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Domestication; Geometric morphometrics; Jaw muscle architecture; Mandible; Skull; Vulpes vulpes

Year:  2021        PMID: 33619173     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.224394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  2 in total

1.  Quantifying bite force in coexisting tayassuids and feral suids: a comparison between morphometric functional proxies and in vivo measurements.

Authors:  Fernando L Sicuro; Luiz Flamarion B Oliveira; Carla D Hendges; Carlos Fonseca
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Comparative craniometric measurements of two Canid species in Egypt: the Egyptian red fox and the Egyptian Baladi dog.

Authors:  Mohamed A A Mahdy; Walid Fathy Mohamed
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.792

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.