Sivapriya Ramamoorthy1, Shira Levy2, Elizaveta Freinkman1, Suchitra K Hourigan3,4, Masouma Mohamed2, Alaa Abdelghani2, Anne M Evans1, Luke A D Miller1, Lopa Mehta5, Sean Moore6. 1. Metabolon, 617 Davis Dr UNIT 100, Morrisville, NC, 27560, USA. 2. Inova Children's Hospital, 3300 Gallows Rd, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA. 3. Inova Children's Hospital, 3300 Gallows Rd, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA. suchihourigan@gmail.com. 4. Pediatric Specialists of Virginia, 3023 Hamaker Ct, Fairfax, VA, 22031, USA. suchihourigan@gmail.com. 5. Inova Health System, 3300 Gallows Rd, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA. 6. Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, 200 Jeanette Lancaster Way, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stool metabolites provide essential insights into the function of the gut microbiome. The current gold standard for storage of stool samples for metabolomics is flash-freezing at - 80 °C which can be inconvenient and expensive. Ambient temperature storage of stool is more practical, however no available methodologies adequately preserve the metabolomic profile of stool. A novel sampling kit (OMNImet.GUT; DNA Genotek, Inc.) was introduced for ambient temperature storage and stabilization of feces for metabolomics; we aimed to test the performance of this kit vs. flash-freezing. To do this stool was collected from an infant's diaper was divided into two aliquots: 1) flash-frozen and 2) stored in an OMNImet.GUT tube at ambient temperature for 3-4 days. Samples from the same infant were collected at 2 different time points to assess metabolite changes over time. Subsequently, all samples underwent metabolomic analysis by liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). RESULTS: Paired fecal samples (flash-frozen and ambient temperature) from 16 infants were collected at 2 time points (32 individual samples, 64 aliquots). Similar numbers of metabolites were detected in both the frozen and ambient temperature samples (1126 in frozen, 1107 in ambient temperature, 1064 shared between sample types). Metabolite abundances were strongly correlated between storage methods (median Spearman correlation Rs = 0.785 across metabolites). Hierarchical clustering analysis and principal component analysis showed that samples from the same individuals at a given time point clustered closely, regardless of the storage method. Repeat samples from the same individual were compared by paired t-test, separately for the frozen and OMNImet.GUT. The number of metabolites in each biochemical class that significantly changed (p < 0.05) at timepoint 2 relative to timepoint 1 was similar in flash-frozen versus ambient temperature storage. Changes in microbiota modified metabolites over time were also consistent across both methodologies. CONCLUSION: Ambient temperature storage and stabilization of stool in the OMNImet.GUT device yielded comparable metabolomic results to flash freezing in terms of 1) the identity and abundance of detected biochemicals 2) the distinct metabolomic profiles of subjects and 3) changes in metabolites over time that are plausibly microbiota-induced. This method potentially provides a more convenient, less expensive home collection and storage option for stool metabolomic analysis.
BACKGROUND: Stool metabolites provide essential insights into the function of the gut microbiome. The current gold standard for storage of stool samples for metabolomics is flash-freezing at - 80 °C which can be inconvenient and expensive. Ambient temperature storage of stool is more practical, however no available methodologies adequately preserve the metabolomic profile of stool. A novel sampling kit (OMNImet.GUT; DNA Genotek, Inc.) was introduced for ambient temperature storage and stabilization of feces for metabolomics; we aimed to test the performance of this kit vs. flash-freezing. To do this stool was collected from an infant's diaper was divided into two aliquots: 1) flash-frozen and 2) stored in an OMNImet.GUT tube at ambient temperature for 3-4 days. Samples from the same infant were collected at 2 different time points to assess metabolite changes over time. Subsequently, all samples underwent metabolomic analysis by liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). RESULTS: Paired fecal samples (flash-frozen and ambient temperature) from 16 infants were collected at 2 time points (32 individual samples, 64 aliquots). Similar numbers of metabolites were detected in both the frozen and ambient temperature samples (1126 in frozen, 1107 in ambient temperature, 1064 shared between sample types). Metabolite abundances were strongly correlated between storage methods (median Spearman correlation Rs = 0.785 across metabolites). Hierarchical clustering analysis and principal component analysis showed that samples from the same individuals at a given time point clustered closely, regardless of the storage method. Repeat samples from the same individual were compared by paired t-test, separately for the frozen and OMNImet.GUT. The number of metabolites in each biochemical class that significantly changed (p < 0.05) at timepoint 2 relative to timepoint 1 was similar in flash-frozen versus ambient temperature storage. Changes in microbiota modified metabolites over time were also consistent across both methodologies. CONCLUSION: Ambient temperature storage and stabilization of stool in the OMNImet.GUT device yielded comparable metabolomic results to flash freezing in terms of 1) the identity and abundance of detected biochemicals 2) the distinct metabolomic profiles of subjects and 3) changes in metabolites over time that are plausibly microbiota-induced. This method potentially provides a more convenient, less expensive home collection and storage option for stool metabolomic analysis.
Authors: Lisa Ford; Adam D Kennedy; Kelli D Goodman; Kirk L Pappan; Anne M Evans; Luke A D Miller; Jacob E Wulff; Bobby R Wiggs; John J Lennon; Sarah Elsea; Douglas R Toal Journal: J Appl Lab Med Date: 2020-03-01
Authors: Naama Karu; Lu Deng; Mordechai Slae; An Chi Guo; Tanvir Sajed; Hien Huynh; Eytan Wine; David S Wishart Journal: Anal Chim Acta Date: 2018-05-12 Impact factor: 6.558
Authors: Jasmine Gratton; Jutarop Phetcharaburanin; Benjamin H Mullish; Horace R T Williams; Mark Thursz; Jeremy K Nicholson; Elaine Holmes; Julian R Marchesi; Jia V Li Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Jonas Zierer; Matthew A Jackson; Gabi Kastenmüller; Massimo Mangino; Tao Long; Amalio Telenti; Robert P Mohney; Kerrin S Small; Jordana T Bell; Claire J Steves; Ana M Valdes; Tim D Spector; Cristina Menni Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2018-05-28 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Thomas J Moutinho; Deborah A Powers; Gabriel F Hanson; Shira Levy; Rajiv Baveja; Isabel Hefner; Masouma Mohamed; Alaa Abdelghani; Robin L Baker; Jason A Papin; Sean R Moore; Suchitra K Hourigan Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 2022-03-13 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: Megan E Petrov; Nana Jiao; Sarada S Panchanathan; Elizabeth Reifsnider; Dean V Coonrod; Li Liu; Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown; Haiwei Gu; Laurie A Davidson; Robert S Chapkin; Corrie M Whisner Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2021-08-31 Impact factor: 2.567