Qiuxia Lin1, Hua Zou2, Xian Chen3, Menglu Wu4, Deyu Ma1, Hanbing Yu1, Siqiang Niu5, Shifeng Huang6. 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Friendship Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China. 2. Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Chongqing Health Center for Women And Children, 120 Longshan Road, Yubei District, Chongqing, 400016, China. 3. Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 59, Haier Road, Laoshan District, Qingdao, 266061, China. 4. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Qingdao Women's and Children's Hospital, No.6, Tongfu Road, Shibei District, Qingdao, 266061, China. 5. Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Friendship Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China. siqiangniu@cqmu.edu.cn. 6. Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Friendship Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China. sfhuang@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treatment options for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) infections were limited. We assessed the efficacy of ceftazidime (CAZ), ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), aztreonam (ATM), and aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) against a selection of 76 S. maltophilia out of the 1179 strains isolated from the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University during 2011-2018. METHODS: We investigated the antimicrobial resistance profiles of the 1179 S. maltophilia clinical isolates from the first affiliated hospital of Chongqing Medical University during 2011-2018, a collection of 76 isolates were selected for further study of microbiological characterization. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CAZ, CAZ-AVI, ATM and ATM-AVI were determined via the broth microdilution method. We deemed that CAZ-AVI or ATM-AVI was more active in vitro than CAZ or ATM alone when CAZ-AVI or ATM-AVI led to a category change from "Resistant" or "Intermediate" with CAZ or ATM alone to "Susceptible" with CAZ-AVI or ATM-AVI, or if the MIC of CAZ-AVI or ATM-AVI was at least 4-fold lower than the MIC of CAZ or ATM alone. RESULTS: For the 76 clinical isolates included in the study, MICs of CAZ, ATM, CAZ-AVI and ATM-AVI ranged from 0.03-64, 1-1024, 0.016-64, and 0.06-64 μg/mL, respectively. In combined therapy, AVI was active at restoring the activity of 48.48% (16/33) and 89.71% (61/68) of S. maltophilia to CAZ and ATM, respectively. Furthermore, CAZ-AVI showed better results in terms of the proportion of susceptible isolates (77.63% vs. 56.58%, P < 0.001), and MIC50 (2 μg/mL vs. 8 μg/mL, P < 0.05) when compared to CAZ. According to our definition, CAZ-AVI was more active in vitro than CAZ alone for 81.58% (62/76) of the isolates. Similarly, ATM-AVI also showed better results in terms of the proportion of susceptible isolates (90.79% vs.10.53%, P < 0.001) and MIC50 (2 μg/mL vs. 64 μg/mL, P < 0.001) when compared to ATM. According to our definition, ATM-AVI was also more active in vitro than ATM alone for 94.74% (72/76) of the isolates. CONCLUSIONS: AVI potentiated the activity of both CAZ and ATM against S. maltophilia clinical isolates in vitro. We demonstrated that CAZ-AVI and ATM-AVI are both useful therapeutic options to treat infections caused by S. maltophilia.
BACKGROUND: Treatment options for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) infections were limited. We assessed the efficacy of ceftazidime (CAZ), ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), aztreonam (ATM), and aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) against a selection of 76 S. maltophilia out of the 1179 strains isolated from the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University during 2011-2018. METHODS: We investigated the antimicrobial resistance profiles of the 1179 S. maltophilia clinical isolates from the first affiliated hospital of Chongqing Medical University during 2011-2018, a collection of 76 isolates were selected for further study of microbiological characterization. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CAZ, CAZ-AVI, ATM and ATM-AVI were determined via the broth microdilution method. We deemed that CAZ-AVI or ATM-AVI was more active in vitro than CAZ or ATM alone when CAZ-AVI or ATM-AVI led to a category change from "Resistant" or "Intermediate" with CAZ or ATM alone to "Susceptible" with CAZ-AVI or ATM-AVI, or if the MIC of CAZ-AVI or ATM-AVI was at least 4-fold lower than the MIC of CAZ or ATM alone. RESULTS: For the 76 clinical isolates included in the study, MICs of CAZ, ATM, CAZ-AVI and ATM-AVI ranged from 0.03-64, 1-1024, 0.016-64, and 0.06-64 μg/mL, respectively. In combined therapy, AVI was active at restoring the activity of 48.48% (16/33) and 89.71% (61/68) of S. maltophilia to CAZ and ATM, respectively. Furthermore, CAZ-AVI showed better results in terms of the proportion of susceptible isolates (77.63% vs. 56.58%, P < 0.001), and MIC50 (2 μg/mL vs. 8 μg/mL, P < 0.05) when compared to CAZ. According to our definition, CAZ-AVI was more active in vitro than CAZ alone for 81.58% (62/76) of the isolates. Similarly, ATM-AVI also showed better results in terms of the proportion of susceptible isolates (90.79% vs.10.53%, P < 0.001) and MIC50 (2 μg/mL vs. 64 μg/mL, P < 0.001) when compared to ATM. According to our definition, ATM-AVI was also more active in vitro than ATM alone for 94.74% (72/76) of the isolates. CONCLUSIONS:AVI potentiated the activity of both CAZ and ATM against S. maltophilia clinical isolates in vitro. We demonstrated that CAZ-AVI and ATM-AVI are both useful therapeutic options to treat infections caused by S. maltophilia.
Authors: Lindsay J Caverly; Theodore Spilker; Linda M Kalikin; Terri Stillwell; Carol Young; David B Huang; John J LiPuma Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Maria F Mojica; Krisztina M Papp-Wallace; Magdalena A Taracila; Melissa D Barnes; Joseph D Rutter; Michael R Jacobs; John J LiPuma; Thomas J Walsh; Alejandro J Vila; Robert A Bonomo Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Maria F Mojica; Christopher P Ouellette; Amy Leber; M Brian Becknell; Monica I Ardura; Federico Perez; Masako Shimamura; Robert A Bonomo; Samuel L Aitken; Samuel A Shelburne Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-08-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Maria F Mojica; Romney Humphries; John J Lipuma; Amy J Mathers; Gauri G Rao; Samuel A Shelburne; Derrick E Fouts; David Van Duin; Robert A Bonomo Journal: JAC Antimicrob Resist Date: 2022-05-05