Literature DB >> 33617808

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Hospitalization Rate and Infection Fatality Rate Among the Non-Congregate Population in Connecticut.

Shiwani Mahajan1, César Caraballo1, Shu-Xia Li2, Yike Dong2, Lian Chen2, Sara K Huston3, Rajesh Srinivasan3, Carrie A Redlich4, Albert I Ko5, Jeremy S Faust6, Howard P Forman7, Harlan M Krumholz8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infection fatality rate and infection hospitalization rate, defined as the proportion of deaths and hospitalizations, respectively, of the total infected individuals, can estimate the actual toll of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on a community, as the denominator is ideally based on a representative sample of a population, which captures the full spectrum of illness, including asymptomatic and untested individuals.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the COVID-19 infection hospitalization rate and infection fatality rate among the non-congregate population in Connecticut between March 1 and June 1, 2020.
METHODS: The infection hospitalization rate and infection fatality rate were calculated for adults residing in non-congregate settings in Connecticut prior to June 2020. Individuals with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies were estimated using the seroprevalence estimates from the recently conducted Post-Infection Prevalence study. Information on total hospitalizations and deaths was obtained from the Connecticut Hospital Association and the Connecticut Department of Public Health, respectively.
RESULTS: Prior to June 1, 2020, nearly 113,515 (90% confidence interval [CI] 56,758-170,273) individuals were estimated to have SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and there were 7792 hospitalizations and 1079 deaths among the non-congregate population. The overall COVID-19 infection hospitalization rate and infection fatality rate were estimated to be 6.86% (90% CI, 4.58%-13.72%) and 0.95% (90% CI, 0.63%-1.90%), respectively, and there was variation in these rate estimates across subgroups; older people, men, non-Hispanic Black people, and those belonging to 2 of the counties had a higher burden of adverse outcomes, although the differences between most subgroups were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Using representative seroprevalence estimates, the overall COVID-19 infection hospitalization rate and infection fatality rate were estimated to be 6.86% and 0.95%, respectively, among community residents in Connecticut. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Infection fatality rate; Infection hospitalization rate; SARS-CoV-2; Seroprevalence

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33617808      PMCID: PMC7895685          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


Using seroprevalence estimates, Connecticut's COVID-19 infection hospitalization rate and infection fatality rate were estimated to be 6.86% (90% confidence interval [CI], 4.58%-13.72%) and 0.95% (90% CI, 0.63%-1.90%), respectively, among the non-congregate population through June 2020, and these estimates varied across subgroups. Representative seroprevalence studies provide important information about infections in a community and can provide robust estimates of the infection hospitalization and fatality rate, when combined with hospitalization and death data. Alt-text: Unlabelled box

Background

Accurate estimation of the hospitalization and fatality rate is important to guide public health strategies during infectious disease outbreaks. Although the case fatality rate, defined as the proportion of deaths of the confirmed cases, is a commonly used metric, it will be biased based on the availability of testing, especially early in the outbreak. Moreover, because coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms range widely, mild or asymptomatic infections may be untested. Thus, the number of infections confirmed by testing will underestimate the total infections, inflating the estimated fatality rate. Infection fatality rate, defined as the proportion of deaths of the total number of infected individuals, can estimate the actual toll of the disease, as the denominator is ideally based on a representative sample of a population, which captures the full spectrum of illness, including asymptomatic and untested individuals. For hospitalizations, the infection hospitalization rate is a comparable measure. Accordingly, with support from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, we conducted a statewide severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroprevalence study—the Post-Infection Prevalence study (PIP)—in Connecticut, and assessed the SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalization and fatality rates using the statewide all-payer databases and the statewide mortality data.

Methods

Based on the PIP study, the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was 4.0% (90% confidence interval [CI], 2.0%-6.0%) among a representative population of adults residing in non-congregate settings (ie, excluding adults residing in a long-term care facility, assisted living facility, nursing home, and a prison or jail) in Connecticut prior to June 2020. We used this seroprevalence estimate and the 2018 American Community Survey to calculate the overall population estimates for individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2. Information on the total COVID-19-related hospitalizations and deaths among the non-congregate population in Connecticut between March 1 and June 1, 2020 was provided by the Connecticut Hospital Association and the Connecticut Department of Public Health, respectively. The diagnostic codes used to identify COVID-19-related hospitalizations are listed in Supplementary Methods 1 (available online). Total COVID-19 deaths included both confirmed and probable COVID-19 deaths (details in Supplementary Methods 1). The infection hospitalization rate and the infection fatality rate were calculated as the number of individuals who were hospitalized and died, respectively, due to COVID-19, divided by the total estimated number of individuals who had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using the seroprevalence estimates (details in Supplementary Methods 2, available online). We estimated the infection hospitalization and fatality rates for the overall population and by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and region subgroups. The margin of error for our estimates was calculated at the 90% confidence level in accordance with the design of the PIP study; however, estimates at 95% CI have also been provided. Due to sample size limitations, the upper end of the CI was non-estimable when stratifying by some sociodemographic characteristics. Statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.0.2. This study was exempted from review by the Institutional Review Board at Yale University because of the public health surveillance activity exclusion.

Results

Of the 2.8 million individuals residing in the non-congregate settings in Connecticut, 113,515 (90% CI, 56,758-170,273) had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (Table 1 ). Between March 1 and June 1, 2020, there were a total of 9425 COVID-19-related hospitalizations and 4071 COVID-19-related deaths in Connecticut, of which 7792 hospitalizations and 1079 deaths occurred among the non-congregate population.
Table 1

Estimated Number of Individuals with SARS-CoV-2-Specific Antibodies Among the Non-Congregate Population in Connecticut, between March 1 and June 1, 2020, by Sociodemographic Characteristics

CharacteristicsTotal Population*nSeroprevalenceof SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies% (± MOE at 90% CI)Estimated Number of Individuals with Antibodiesn (90% CI)
State total2,837,8774.0% (± 2.0)113,515 (56,758-170,273)
Sex
 Men1,365,0192.5% (± 2.4%)34,125 (1365-66,886)
 Women1,472,8585.3% (± 2.9%)78,061 (35,349-120,774)
Age group, years
 18-29564,7386.4% (± 7.7%)36,143 (NE-79,628)
 30-44649,8744.9% (± 4.6%)31,844 (1950-61,738)
 45-54496,6286.6% (± 4.7%)32,777 (9436-56,119)
 55-64513,6562.6% (± 2.4%)13,355 (1027-25,683)
 ≥65612,9810.8% (± 1.2%)4904 (NE-12,260)
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic Black278,1126.4% (± 5.5%)17,799 (2503-33,095)
 Non-Hispanic White1,969,4872.7% (± 1.7%)53,176 (19,695-86,657)
 Latino/Hispanic408,65419.9% (± 6.7%)81,322 (53,942-108,702)
County
 New Haven683,9283.4% (± 3.2%)23,254 (1368-45,139)
 New London215,6791.7% (± 3.3%)3667 (NE-10,784)
 Middlesex133,380
 Fairfield732,1725.7% (± 5.4%)41,734 (2197-81,271)
 Hartford706,6314.0% (± 3.6)28,265 (2827-53,704)
 Litchfield147,5701.6% (± 3.2%)2361 (NE-7083)

CI = confidence interval; MOE = margin of error; NE = non-estimable; SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Source: 2018 American Community Survey.

Source: Post-Infection Prevalence Study.

Estimated Number of Individuals with SARS-CoV-2-Specific Antibodies Among the Non-Congregate Population in Connecticut, between March 1 and June 1, 2020, by Sociodemographic Characteristics CI = confidence interval; MOE = margin of error; NE = non-estimable; SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Source: 2018 American Community Survey. Source: Post-Infection Prevalence Study. The overall COVID-19 infection hospitalization rate and infection fatality rate were estimated to be 6.86% (90% CI, 4.58%-13.72%) and 0.95% (90% CI, 0.63%-1.90%) among the non-congregate population. There was variation in infection hospitalization rate and infection fatality rate estimates across subgroups and older people, men, non-Hispanic Black people, and those belonging to New Haven and Litchfield counties had a higher burden of adverse outcomes, though the differences between most subgroups were not statistically significant (Table 2 ). Population estimates and the estimates for the infection hospitalization and fatality rates at the 95% CI are presented in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 (available online).
Table 2

Infection Hospitalization Rate and Infection Fatality Rate Among the Non-Congregate Population in Connecticut between March 1 and June 1, 2020, by Sociodemographic Characteristics

COVID-19-Related Hospitalizationsn (%)Infection Hospitalization Rate% (90% CI)Total* COVID-19-Related Deathsn (%)Total Infection Fatality Rate% (90% CI)
State Total7792 (100%)6.86 (4.58-13.72)1079 (100%)0.95 (0.63-1.90)
Sex
 Men4166 (53.47%)12.21 (6.23-NE)815 (75.53%)2.39 (1.22-59.71)
 Women3625 (46.52%)4.64 (3.00-10.25)264 (24.47%)0.34 (0.22-0.75)
Age group, years
 18-29288 (3.70%)0.80 (0.36-NE)5 (0.46%)0.01 (0.01-NE)
 30-44855 (10.97%)2.68 (1.38-43.85)34 (3.15%)0.11 (0.06-1.74)
 45-541013 (13.00%)3.09 (1.81-10.74)59 (5.47%)0.18 (0.11-0.63)
 55-641660 (21.30%)12.43 (6.46-NE)174 (16.13%)1.30 (0.68-16.94)
 ≥653918 (50.28%)79.89 (31.96-NE)807 (74.79%)16.46 (6.58-NE)
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic Black1762 (22.61%)9.90 (5.32-70.40)259 (24.00%)1.46 (0.78-10.35)
 Non-Hispanic White3948 (50.67%)7.42 (4.56-20.05)593 (54.96%)1.12 (0.68-3.01)
 Latino/Hispanic845 (10.84%)1.04 (0.78-1.57)190 (17.61%)0.23 (0.17-0.35)
County
 New Haven2101 (26.96%)9.04 (4.65-NE)270 (25.02%)1.16 (0.60-19.74)
 New London148 (1.90%)4.04 (1.37-NE)21 (1.95%)0.57 (0.19-NE)
 Middlesex231 (2.96%)NE32 (2.97%)NE
 Fairfield2665 (34.20%)6.39 (3.28-NE)399 (36.98%)0.96 (0.49-18.16)
 Hartford1755 (22.52%)6.21 (3.27-62.08)294 (27.25%)1.04 (0.55-10.40)
 Litchfield195 (2.50%)8.26 (2.75-NE)39 (3.61%)1.65 (0.55-NE)

CI = confidence interval; NE = non-estimable.

Total COVID-19-related deaths includes both confirmed and probable COVID-19 deaths.

Supplementary Table 1

Estimated Number of Individuals with SARS-CoV-2-Specific Antibodies at 95% Confidence Interval among the Non-Congregate Population in Connecticut, between March 1 and June 1, 2020, by Sociodemographic Characteristics

CharacteristicsTotal Population*nSeroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies% (± MOE at 95% CI)Estimated Number of Individuals with Antibodiesn (95% CI)
State total2,837,8774.0% (± 2.3)113,515 (48,244-178,786)
Sex
 Men1,365,0192.5% (± 2.9%)34,125 (NE-73,711)
 Women1,472,8585.3% (± 3.5%)78,061 (26,511-129,612)
Age group, years
 18-29564,7386.4% (± 9.2%)36,143 (NE-88,099)
 30-44649,8744.9% (± 5.5%)31,844 (NE-67,587)
 45-54496,6286.6% (± 5.6%)32,777 (NE-60,589)
 55-64513,6562.6% (± 2.9%)13,355 (NE-28,251)
 ≥65612,9810.8% (± 1.4%)4904 (NE-13,486)
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic Black278,1126.4% (± 6.5%)17,799 (NE-35,876)
 Non-Hispanic White1,969,4872.7% (± 2.0%)53,176 (13,786-92,566)
 Latino/Hispanic408,65419.9% (± 8.0%)81,322 (48,630-114,015)
County
 New Haven683,9283.4% (± 3.8%)23,254 (NE-49,243)
 New London215,6791.7% (± 4.0%)3667 (NE-12,294)
 Middlesex133,380
 Fairfield732,1725.7% (± 6.4%)41,734 (NE-88,593)
 Hartford706,6314.0% (± 4.3%)28,265 (NE-58,650)
 Litchfield147,5701.6% (± 3.8%)2361 (NE-7969)

CI = confidence interval; MOE = margin of error; NE = non-estimable; SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Source: 2018 American Community Survey.

Source: Post-Infection Prevalence Study.

Supplementary Table 2

Estimates for Infection Hospitalization Rate and Infection Fatality Rate at 95% Margin of Error Among the Non-Congregate Population in Connecticut between March 1 and June 1, 2020, by Sociodemographic Characteristics

COVID-19-Related HospitalizationsnInfection Hospitalization Rate% (95% CI)Total* COVID-19-related DeathsnTotal Infection Fatality Rate% (95% CI)
State total7792 (100%)6.86 (4.36-16.15)1079 (100%)0.95 (0.60-2.24)
Sex
 Men4166 (53.47%)12.21 (5.67-NE)815 (75.53%)2.39 (1.11-NE)
 Women3625 (46.52%)4.64 (2.80-14.21)264 (24.47%)0.34 (0.20-1.00)
Age group, years
 18-29288 (3.70%)0.80 (0.33-NE)5 (0.46%)0.01 (0.01-NE)
 30-44855 (10.97%)2.68 (1.27-NE)34 (3.15%)0.11 (0.05-NE)
 45-541013 (13.00%)3.09 (1.67-NE)59 (5.47%)0.18 (0.10-NE)
 55-641660 (21.30%)12.43 (5.88-NE)174 (16.13%)1.30 (0.62-NE)
 ≥653918 (50.28%)79.89 (29.05-NE)807 (74.79%)16.46 (5.98-NE)
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic Black1762 (22.61%)9.90 (1.90-NE)259 (24.00%)1.46 (0.72-NE)
 Non-Hispanic White3948 (50.67%)7.42 (11.00-28.64)593 (54.96%)1.12 (0.64-4.30)
 Latino/Hispanic845 (10.84%)1.04 (0.74-1.74)190 (17.61%)0.23 (0.17-0.39)
County
 New Haven2101 (26.96%)9.04 (4.27-NE)270 (25.02%)1.16 (0.55-NE)
 New London148 (1.90%)4.04 (1.20-NE)21 (1.95%)0.57 (0.17-NE)
 Middlesex231 (2.96%)NE32 (2.97%)NE
 Fairfield2665 (34.20%)6.39 (3.01-NE)399 (36.98%)0.96 (0.45-NE)
 Hartford1755 (22.52%)6.21 (2.99-NE)294 (27.25%)1.04 (0.50-NE)
 Litchfield195 (2.50%)8.26 (2.45-NE)39 (3.61%)1.65 (0.49-NE)

CI = confidence interval; COVID-19 = Coronavirus disease 2019; NE = non-estimable.

Total COVID-19-related deaths includes both confirmed and probable COVID-19 deaths.

Infection Hospitalization Rate and Infection Fatality Rate Among the Non-Congregate Population in Connecticut between March 1 and June 1, 2020, by Sociodemographic Characteristics CI = confidence interval; NE = non-estimable. Total COVID-19-related deaths includes both confirmed and probable COVID-19 deaths.

Discussion

Using seroprevalence estimates, we estimated that, through June 2020, Connecticut's COVID-19 infection hospitalization rate and infection fatality rate were 6.86% and 0.95%, respectively, and these estimates varied across subgroups. Our estimates are distinctive because they reflect people living in the community and are based on a methodology that sought to obtain a representative estimate for the denominator and brought together multiple streams of data. There has been continued controversy about the infection fatality rate, and the literature is replete with widely varied estimates.4, 5, 6, 7, 8 However, most studies do not have a representative sample or separate out special populations, such as those in nursing homes. , Moreover, infection fatality rate is not an inherent characteristic of the disease, but rather a confluence of the pathogen virulence, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the population, health care availability and quality, therapeutic availability, and accurate counting and reporting of COVID-19-related deaths. As such, an overall infection fatality rate may not be very informative, given the heterogeneity across regions. The COVID-19 infection hospitalization rate is not well described, and most studies report the case hospitalization rate, which also varies widely in the literature.10, 11, 12 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated a US COVID-19 case hospitalization rate of 14.0% for infections prior to June 2020. As expected, this case hospitalization rate estimate was higher than Connecticut's estimated infection hospitalization rate in our study (6.9%), as infection hospitalization rate includes the total estimated infections rather than detected positive cases only. Moreover, our estimate excluded individuals from congregate settings, which had a higher burden of adverse outcomes. Our subgroup findings are notable, even though the differences between subgroups were not statistically significant. Prior studies have noted that age and sex are associated with disease severity, however, they have been hampered by including nursing home residents and biased by testing patterns. We had the opportunity to identify hospitalizations and deaths among the non-congregate population in Connecticut and show that, even in the community, these associations remain. Prior studies have shown that Black people have had disproportionately higher infection rates, even as some studies indicate that hospital mortality does not vary by race/ethnicity. Our findings highlight that the burden of COVID-19 among Black subpopulations is not just about infection rates but also worse outcomes. The lower infection hospitalization rate for Latino/Hispanic individuals was in accordance with previously reported low hospital admission rates among Latino/Hispanic individuals testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 in Baltimore/Washington, DC and may be associated with the lower insurance rates among the Latino/Hispanic subpopulation in Connecticut. Limitations of our study include potential underestimation of COVID-19-related hospitalizations due to limited testing availability; underestimation of total infections due to the decrease in antibody concentration over time or poor sensitivity of serology tests; lack of power to detect statistical differences between subgroups due to the small sample size; and that our findings may not be generalizable to other regions or across time. Nevertheless, this study shows that representative seroprevalence studies provide important information about infections in a community and can provide robust estimates of the infection hospitalization and fatality rates, when combined with hospitalization and death data. In conclusion, using representative seroprevalence estimates, the COVID-19 infection hospitalization rate and infection fatality rate were estimated to be 6.86% (90% CI, 4.58%-13.72%) and 0.95% (90% CI, 0.63%-1.90%), respectively, among the non-congregate population in Connecticut through June 1, 2020.
ICD-10 CodesDescription
J1289 and (B9729 or U071)COVID-related pneumonia
(J208 or J40) and (B9729 or U071)COVID-related bronchitis
(J988 or J22) and (B9729 or U071)COVID-related respiratory infection
J80 and (B9729 or U071)COVID-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
U071COVID-19

Note: the above diagnosis codes can be in any position, ie, they do not have to be the principal diagnosis code.

  11 in total

Review 1.  SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis.

Authors:  Mart M Lamers; Bart L Haagmans
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 2.  Efficacy and safety of corticosteroid regimens for the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fangwen Zhou; Jiawen Deng; Kiyan Heybati; Qi Kang Zuo; Saif Ali; Wenteng Hou; Chi Yi Wong; Harikrishnaa Ba Ramaraju; Oswin Chang; Thanansayan Dhivagaran; Zachary Silver
Journal:  Future Virol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 3.  The Effect of COVID-19 on the Menstrual Cycle: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vojka Lebar; Antonio Simone Laganà; Vito Chiantera; Tina Kunič; David Lukanović
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  The association of airborne particulate matter and benzo[a]pyrene with the clinical course of COVID-19 in patients hospitalized in Poland.

Authors:  Piotr Rzymski; Barbara Poniedziałek; Joanna Rosińska; Magdalena Rogalska; Dorota Zarębska-Michaluk; Marta Rorat; Anna Moniuszko-Malinowska; Beata Lorenc; Dorota Kozielewicz; Anna Piekarska; Katarzyna Sikorska; Anna Dworzańska; Beata Bolewska; Grzegorz Angielski; Justyna Kowalska; Regina Podlasin; Barbara Oczko-Grzesik; Włodzimierz Mazur; Aleksandra Szymczak; Robert Flisiak
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 9.988

5.  Use of COVID-19 Test Positivity Rate, Epidemiological, and Clinical Tools for Guiding Targeted Public Health Interventions.

Authors:  Nivedita Gupta; Salaj Rana; Samiran Panda; Balram Bhargava
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-16

6.  Access to and safety of COVID-19 convalescent plasma in the United States Expanded Access Program: A national registry study.

Authors:  Jonathon W Senefeld; Patrick W Johnson; Katie L Kunze; Evan M Bloch; Noud van Helmond; Michael A Golafshar; Stephen A Klassen; Allan M Klompas; Matthew A Sexton; Juan C Diaz Soto; Brenda J Grossman; Aaron A R Tobian; Ruchika Goel; Chad C Wiggins; Katelyn A Bruno; Camille M van Buskirk; James R Stubbs; Jeffrey L Winters; Arturo Casadevall; Nigel S Paneth; Beth H Shaz; Molly M Petersen; Bruce S Sachais; Matthew R Buras; Mikolaj A Wieczorek; Benjamin Russoniello; Larry J Dumont; Sarah E Baker; Ralph R Vassallo; John R A Shepherd; Pampee P Young; Nicole C Verdun; Peter Marks; N Rebecca Haley; Robert F Rea; Louis Katz; Vitaly Herasevich; Dan A Waxman; Emily R Whelan; Aviv Bergman; Andrew J Clayburn; Mary Kathryn Grabowski; Kathryn F Larson; Juan G Ripoll; Kylie J Andersen; Matthew N P Vogt; Joshua J Dennis; Riley J Regimbal; Philippe R Bauer; Janis E Blair; Zachary A Buchholtz; Michaela C Pletsch; Katherine Wright; Joel T Greenshields; Michael J Joyner; R Scott Wright; Rickey E Carter; DeLisa Fairweather
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  High Levels of Sedentary Time in Patients with COVID-19 after Hospitalisation.

Authors:  Bram M A van Bakel; Frederik M A van den Heuvel; Jacqueline L Vos; Hajar Rotbi; Esmée A Bakker; Robin Nijveldt; Dick H J Thijssen; Thijs M H Eijsvogels
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Trends in seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and infection fatality rate in the Norwegian population through the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Gro Tunheim; Gunnar Øyvind Isaksson Rø; Trung Tran; Anne-Marte Bakken Kran; Jan Terje Andersen; Eline Benno Vaage; Anette Kolderup; John Torgils Vaage; Fridtjof Lund-Johansen; Olav Hungnes
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Age-specific rate of severe and critical SARS-CoV-2 infections estimated with multi-country seroprevalence studies.

Authors:  Daniel Herrera-Esposito; Gustavo de Los Campos
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  SARS-CoV-2 active infection prevalence and seroprevalence in the adult population of St. Louis County.

Authors:  Charles W Goss; Brett B Maricque; Victoria V Anwuri; Rachel E Cohen; Kate Donaldson; Kimberly J Johnson; William G Powderly; Kenneth B Schechtman; Spring Schmidt; Jeannette Jackson Thompson; Anne M Trolard; Jinli Wang; Elvin H Geng
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 6.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.