Jeydith Gutierrez1,2, Jane Moeckli1,3, Andrea Holcombe3, Amy Mj O'Shea1,2,3, George Bailey3, Kelby Rewerts3, Mariko Hagiwara2, Steven Sullivan4, Melissa Simon4, Peter Kaboli1,2,3. 1. VA Office of Rural Health (ORH), Veterans Rural Health Resource Center - Iowa City, Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, Iowa. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa. 3. The Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) at the Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, Iowa. 4. Acute Care Services, Tomah VA Medical Center, Tomah, Wisconsin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Telehospitalist services are an innovative alternative approach to address staffing issues in rural and small hospitals. OBJECTIVE: To determine clinical outcomes and staff and patient satisfaction with a novel telehospitalist program among Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of a quality improvement program with pre- and postimplementation measures. The hub site was a tertiary (high-complexity) VHA hospital, and the spoke site was a 10-bed inpatient medical unit at a rural (low-complexity) VHA hospital. All patients admitted during the study period were assigned to the spoke site. INTERVENTION: Real-time videoconferencing was used to connect a remote hospitalist physician with an on-site advanced practice provider and patients. Encounters were documented in the electronic health record. MAIN OUTCOMES: Process measures included workload, patient encounters, and daily census. Outcome measures included length of stay (LOS), readmission rate, mortality, and satisfaction of providers, staff, and patients. Surveys measured satisfaction. Qualitative analysis included unstructured and semi-structured interviews with spoke-site staff. RESULTS: Telehospitalist program implementation led to a significant reduction in LOS (3.0 [SD, 0.7] days vs 2.3 [SD, 0.3] days). The readmission rate was slightly higher in the telehospitalist group, with no change in mortality rate. Satisfaction among teleproviders was very high. Hub staff perceived the service as valuable, though satisfaction with the program was mixed. Technology and communication challenges were identified, but patient satisfaction remained mostly unchanged. CONCLUSION: Telehospitalist programs are a feasible and safe way to provide inpatient coverage and address rural hospital staffing needs. Ensuring adequate technological quality and addressing staff concerns in a timely manner can enhance program performance.
BACKGROUND: Telehospitalist services are an innovative alternative approach to address staffing issues in rural and small hospitals. OBJECTIVE: To determine clinical outcomes and staff and patient satisfaction with a novel telehospitalist program among Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of a quality improvement program with pre- and postimplementation measures. The hub site was a tertiary (high-complexity) VHA hospital, and the spoke site was a 10-bed inpatient medical unit at a rural (low-complexity) VHA hospital. All patients admitted during the study period were assigned to the spoke site. INTERVENTION: Real-time videoconferencing was used to connect a remote hospitalist physician with an on-site advanced practice provider and patients. Encounters were documented in the electronic health record. MAIN OUTCOMES: Process measures included workload, patient encounters, and daily census. Outcome measures included length of stay (LOS), readmission rate, mortality, and satisfaction of providers, staff, and patients. Surveys measured satisfaction. Qualitative analysis included unstructured and semi-structured interviews with spoke-site staff. RESULTS: Telehospitalist program implementation led to a significant reduction in LOS (3.0 [SD, 0.7] days vs 2.3 [SD, 0.3] days). The readmission rate was slightly higher in the telehospitalist group, with no change in mortality rate. Satisfaction among teleproviders was very high. Hub staff perceived the service as valuable, though satisfaction with the program was mixed. Technology and communication challenges were identified, but patient satisfaction remained mostly unchanged. CONCLUSION: Telehospitalist programs are a feasible and safe way to provide inpatient coverage and address rural hospital staffing needs. Ensuring adequate technological quality and addressing staff concerns in a timely manner can enhance program performance.
Authors: Sumesh Khanal; Joseph Burgon; Saoirse Leonard; Matthew Griffiths; Lucy A Eddowes Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Meghan M JaKa; Jennifer M Dinh; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Jerome C Siy; Ameet P Doshi; Yonatan Platt; John R Dressen Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: David M Levine; Mary Paz; Kimberly Burke; Ryan Beaumont; Robert B Boxer; Charles A Morris; Kathryn A Britton; E John Orav; Jeffrey L Schnipper Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-08-01