| Literature DB >> 33617185 |
Chun-Yan Tao1,2, Selena Chen3, Xue-Ying Li4, Chao-Shu Tang5, Jun-Bao Du1,2, Hong-Fang Jin1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vasovagal syncope (VVS) greatly impairs quality of life. The therapeutic efficacy of oral rehydration saline (ORS) for unselected VVS patients is not satisfactory due to the diverse mechanisms of the disease. Body mass index (BMI) was demonstrated to reflect blood volume to a certain extent. Therefore, the present study explored the capability of BMI to predict the therapeutic response of children with VVS to ORS treatment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33617185 PMCID: PMC7909309 DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001168
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med J (Engl) ISSN: 0366-6999 Impact factor: 2.628
Figure 1Flow chart and statistical analysis procedures for this study. VVS: Vasovagal syncope; ORS: Oral rehydration saline; BMI: Body mass index; ROC curve: Receiver operating characteristic curve.
Comparisons of characteristics of responders and non-responders in 74 patients with vasovagal syncope.
| Treatment response | |||||
| Characteristics | All patients ( | Responders ( | Non-responders ( | Statistics | |
| Sex (female/male, | 38/36 | 26/26 | 12/10 | 0.128† | 0.721 |
| Age at the first syncope event (years) | 8.7 ± 2.8 | 8.7 ± 3.0 | 8.7 ± 2.5 | –0.019‡ | 0.985 |
| Age at HUTT (years) | 10.0 (8.0, 13.0) | 10.0 (8.0, 13.0) | 11.5 ± 3.0 | –1.776§ | 0.076 |
| Duration of symptoms before treatment (months) | 12.0 (3.8, 36.0) | 9.5 (2.0, 24.0) | 34.3 ± 23.6 | –3.283§ | 0.001 |
| Duration of treatment (months) | 3.0 (2.0, 3.0) | 2.5 (2.0, 3.0) | 3.0 (2.0, 3.0) | –0.043§ | 0.966 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) at baseline | 17.1 (15.9, 19.4) | 16.4 (15.5, 17.8) | 20.7 ± 3.6 | –4.305§ | < 0.001 |
| Symptom scores before treatment (points) | 1 (1, 1) | 1 (1, 1) | 1 (1, 1) | –0.143§ | 0.886 |
| Symptom scores at follow-up (points) | 0 (0, 1) | 0 (0, 0) | 1 (1, 1) | –7.777§ | < 0.001 |
| Supine heart rate in HUTT (bpm) | 75 (68, 80) | 75 (70, 82) | 71 ± 11 | –1.640§ | 0.101 |
| Supine systolic BP in HUTT (mmHg) | 104 ± 9 | 104 ± 9 | 104 ± 8 | –0.069‡ | 0.945 |
| Supine diastolic BP in HUTT (mmHg) | 60 ± 8 | 61 ± 8 | 58 ± 8 | –1.310‡ | 0.195 |
| Positive heart rate in HUTT (bpm) | 75 (64, 114) | 77 (63, 115) | 73 (63, 114) | –0.325§ | 0.745 |
| Positive systolic BP in HUTT (mmHg) | 75 (66, 83) | 74 (65, 82) | 80 ± 14 | –1.698§ | 0.089 |
| Positive diastolic BP in HUTT (mmHg) | 42 ± 9 | 42 ± 9 | 44 ± 11 | 1.116‡ | 0.268 |
| Response time in HUTT (minutes) | 14 (10, 26) | 14 (9, 26) | 14 (10, 28) | –0.563§ | 0.574 |
| Hemodynamic type ratio of VVS (VI/[MI+CI], | 48/26 | 31/21 | 17/5 | 2.115† | 0.146 |
Normally distributed data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, otherwise as the median (25th, 75th percentiles). Categorical data are expressed as frequencies. ∗Comparisons between responders and non-responders. †χ2 value. ‡t value. §Z value. HUTT: head-up tilt test; BP: blood pressure; VVS: vasovagal syncope; VI: vasoinhibitory response; MI: mixed inhibitory response; CI: Cardioinhibitory response.
Figure 2Correlation between baseline body mass index and response time in HUTT. CI: Confidence interval; HUTT: Head-up tilt test.
Figure 3Receiver operating characteristic curve of baseline body mass index for predicting the therapeutic efficacy of oral rehydration saline in vasovagal syncope patients. AUC: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI: Confidence interval.