Literature DB >> 33616716

Facial Contour Refining after Surgery-First SSRO with Computer-Assisted Design in East Asians.

Chenzhi Lai1, Guodong Song1, Xianlei Zong1, Xiaolei Jin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgery-first sagittal split ramus osteotomies (SF-SSRO) are an effective treatment for patients with dental malocclusion. However, some patients with mandibular prognathism usually have facial deficiencies which cannot be corrected completely after orthognathic surgery. These are not accepted because the remaining facial contours are in disharmony.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients, who were unsatisfied with their appearances after SF-SSRO and orthodontics, were included. The preoperative CTs were used to investigate patients for facial deformity. To achieve a harmonious facial contour, mandible long-curve osteotomy/mandible U-shaped osteotomy, genioplasty or facial autologous fat grafting was selected depending on patients' contour deformities with the assistance of CAD.
RESULTS: Among the patients who underwent osteotomy, the gonial angle was improved from 111.16° ± 9 to 111.58° ± 9.06 after SF-SSRO because of distal fragment setback and rotation. After facial refine surgery, the gonial angle was significantly increased to 121.69°±2.41 (p < 0.05). And the mandibular width was decreased from 11.29 cm ± 0.44 to 10.45 cm ± 0.39 (p < 0.05) after mandibular outer plate griding. All patients were shown no signs of infection, massive bleeding, and osteonecrosis in the early stage. After follow-up time, they were all satisfied with their results and most of them recovered from lip numbness.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated the clinical feasibility of two-stage orthognathic and facial bone contouring surgery for the treatment of dentofacial deformities. Two-stage facial contouring surgery can provide esthetic improvement for more accuracy in refining the facial contour. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-assisted design; Mandibular plasty; Orthognathic surgery; Sagittal split ramus osteotomies; Surgery-first

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33616716     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02181-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  2 in total

1.  A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technic for correction of mandibular prognathism.

Authors:  E E Hunsuck
Journal:  J Oral Surg       Date:  1968-04

2.  Skeletal and dental changes after surgical correction of mandibular prognathism.

Authors:  M Reitzik
Journal:  J Oral Surg       Date:  1980-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.