| Literature DB >> 33616652 |
Bob Löwenberg1, Thomas Pabst2, Johan Maertens3, Patrycja Gradowska4, Bart J Biemond5, Olivier Spertini6, Edo Vellenga7, Laimonas Griskevicius8, Lidwine W Tick9, Mojca Jongen-Lavrencic1, Marinus van Marwijk Kooy10, Marie-Christiane Vekemans11, Walter J F M van der Velden12, Berna Beverloo13, Lucienne Michaux14, Carlos Graux15, Dries Deeren16, Okke de Weerdt17, Joost W J van Esser18, Mario Bargetzi19, Saskia K Klein20, Alain Gadisseur21, Peter E Westerweel22, Hendrik Veelken23, Michael Gregor24, Tobias Silzle25, Daniëlle van Lammeren-Venema26, Ine Moors27, Dimitri A Breems28, Mels Hoogendoorn29, Marie-Cecile J C Legdeur30, Thomas Fischer31, Juergen Kuball32, Jan Cornelissen1, Kimmo Porkka33, Gunnar Juliusson34, Peter Meyer35, Martin Höglund36, Bjorn T Gjertsen37, Jeroen J W M Janssen38, Gerwin Huls7, Jakob Passweg39, Jacqueline Cloos38, Peter J M Valk1, Catharina H M J van Elssen40, Markus G Manz41, Yngvar Floisand42, Gert J Ossenkoppele38.
Abstract
Lenalidomide, an antineoplastic and immunomodulatory drug, has therapeutic activity in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but definitive studies about its therapeutic utility have been lacking. In a phase 3 study, we compared 2 induction regimens in newly diagnosed patients age 18 to 65 years with AML: idarubicine-cytarabine (cycle 1) and daunorubicin and intermediate-dose cytarabine (cycle 2) without or with lenalidomide (15 mg orally on days 1-21). One final consolidation cycle of chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) or allogeneic SCT (allo-SCT) was provided according to a prognostic risk and minimal residual disease (MRD)-adapted approach. Event-free survival (EFS; primary end point) and other clinical end points were assessed. A second random assignment in patients in complete response or in complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery after cycle 3 or auto-SCT involved 6 cycles of maintenance with lenalidomide (10 mg on days 1-21) or observation. In all, 392 patients were randomly assigned to the control group, and 388 patients were randomly assigned to lenalidomide induction. At a median follow-up of 41 months, the study revealed no differences in outcome between the treatments (EFS, 44% ± 2% standard error and overall survival, 54% ± 2% at 4 years for both arms) although in an exploratory post hoc analysis, a lenalidomide benefit was suggested in SRSF2-mutant AML. In relation to the previous Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group and Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (HOVON-SAKK) studies that used a similar 3-cycle regimen but did not pursue an MRD-guided approach, these survival estimates compare markedly more favorably. MRD status after cycle 2 lost prognostic value in intermediate-risk AML in the risk-adjusted treatment context. Maintenance with lenalidomide showed no apparent effect on relapse probability in 88 patients randomly assigned for this part of the study.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33616652 PMCID: PMC7903238 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003855
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood Adv ISSN: 2473-9529