Jing Zhao1, Hong Shen1, Xiaoye Hu1, Yuebing Wang2, Ying Yuan1. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. 2. College of Metrology and Measurement Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the survival benefit, pain control and safety of low-power cumulative and traditional high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed 55 patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who received HIFU treatment between January 2008 and April 2014 in our department. 23 patients received low-power cumulative HIFU treatment (L group), 32 received the traditional HIFU treatment (T group). Performance status, cancer-related pain and serum biochemistry results were assessed before and after treatment. All patients were followed up until death. The survival rate and adverse events of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were generally well balanced (p > 0.05). The average KPS score after treatment was significantly improved in both groups compared with the baseline score. 36 patients exhibited tumor-related pain at baseline. The pain response rate was significantly higher in the L group (92.3%) than in the T group (52.2%) (p = 0.025). The median overall survival (OS) for the L group was 7.0 months, which was significantly longer than that of the T group (p = 0.000). The 3-month and 6-month survival rates were higher in the L group. The adverse events in both groups included abdominal pain, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and elevated amylase. The incidence was lower in the L group than in the T group. CONCLUSION: Compared with traditional HIFU treatment, low-power cumulative HIFU treatment showed a significantly higher pain relief rate and survival benefit with a better safety profile in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
PURPOSE: To compare the survival benefit, pain control and safety of low-power cumulative and traditional high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed 55 patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who received HIFU treatment between January 2008 and April 2014 in our department. 23 patients received low-power cumulative HIFU treatment (L group), 32 received the traditional HIFU treatment (T group). Performance status, cancer-related pain and serum biochemistry results were assessed before and after treatment. All patients were followed up until death. The survival rate and adverse events of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were generally well balanced (p > 0.05). The average KPS score after treatment was significantly improved in both groups compared with the baseline score. 36 patients exhibited tumor-related pain at baseline. The pain response rate was significantly higher in the L group (92.3%) than in the T group (52.2%) (p = 0.025). The median overall survival (OS) for the L group was 7.0 months, which was significantly longer than that of the T group (p = 0.000). The 3-month and 6-month survival rates were higher in the L group. The adverse events in both groups included abdominal pain, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and elevated amylase. The incidence was lower in the L group than in the T group. CONCLUSION: Compared with traditional HIFU treatment, low-power cumulative HIFU treatment showed a significantly higher pain relief rate and survival benefit with a better safety profile in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.