Michelle Zhang1,2, Meredith Sadinski1, Dana Haddad1,3,4,5, Min Sun Bae1,6, Danny Martinez1, Elizabeth A Morris1, Peter Gibbs1, Elizabeth J Sutton1. 1. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States. 2. Department of Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 3. Department of Radiology, Montefiore, New York, NY, United States. 4. Department of Radiology, Mediclinic Middle East, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. 5. College of Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. 6. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) can potentially serve as a prognostic marker, by possible correlation with molecular subtype. Oncotype Dx, a gene assay, is a prognostic and predictive surrogate for tumor aggressiveness and treatment response. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between contralateral non-tumor breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) background parenchymal enhancement and tumor oncotype score. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients with ER+ and HER2- early stage invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent preoperative breast MRI, oncotype risk scoring, and breast conservation surgery from 2008-2010 were identified. After registration, BPE from the pre and three post-contrast phases was automatically extracted using a k-means clustering algorithm. Four metrics were calculated: initial enhancement (IE) relative to the pre-contrast signal, late enhancement, overall enhancement (OE), and area under the enhancement curve (AUC). Histogram analysis was performed to determine first order metrics which were compared to oncotype risk score groups using Mann-Whitney tests and Spearman rank correlation analysis. RESULTS: This study included 80 women (mean age = 51.1 ± 10.3 years); 46 women were categorized as low risk (≤17) and 34 women were categorized as intermediate/high risk (≥18) according to Oncotype Dx. For the mean of the top 10% pixels, significant differences were noted for IE (p = 0.032), OE (p = 0.049), and AUC (p = 0.044). Using the risk score as a continuous variable, correlation analysis revealed a weak but significant correlation with the mean of the top 10% pixels for IE (r = 0.26, p = 0.02), OE (r = 0.25, p = 0.02), and AUC (r = 0.27, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: BPE metrics of enhancement in the non-tumor breast are associated with tumor Oncotype Dx recurrence score, suggesting that the breast microenvironment may relate to likelihood of recurrence and magnitude of chemotherapy benefit.
PURPOSE: Breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) can potentially serve as a prognostic marker, by possible correlation with molecular subtype. Oncotype Dx, a gene assay, is a prognostic and predictive surrogate for tumor aggressiveness and treatment response. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between contralateral non-tumor breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) background parenchymal enhancement and tumor oncotype score. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients with ER+ and HER2- early stage invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent preoperative breast MRI, oncotype risk scoring, and breast conservation surgery from 2008-2010 were identified. After registration, BPE from the pre and three post-contrast phases was automatically extracted using a k-means clustering algorithm. Four metrics were calculated: initial enhancement (IE) relative to the pre-contrast signal, late enhancement, overall enhancement (OE), and area under the enhancement curve (AUC). Histogram analysis was performed to determine first order metrics which were compared to oncotype risk score groups using Mann-Whitney tests and Spearman rank correlation analysis. RESULTS: This study included 80 women (mean age = 51.1 ± 10.3 years); 46 women were categorized as low risk (≤17) and 34 women were categorized as intermediate/high risk (≥18) according to Oncotype Dx. For the mean of the top 10% pixels, significant differences were noted for IE (p = 0.032), OE (p = 0.049), and AUC (p = 0.044). Using the risk score as a continuous variable, correlation analysis revealed a weak but significant correlation with the mean of the top 10% pixels for IE (r = 0.26, p = 0.02), OE (r = 0.25, p = 0.02), and AUC (r = 0.27, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: BPE metrics of enhancement in the non-tumor breast are associated with tumor Oncotype Dx recurrence score, suggesting that the breast microenvironment may relate to likelihood of recurrence and magnitude of chemotherapy benefit.
Authors: Bas H M van der Velden; Ivan Dmitriev; Claudette E Loo; Ruud M Pijnappel; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-03-26 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Elizabeth J Sutton; Jung Hun Oh; Brittany Z Dashevsky; Harini Veeraraghavan; Aditya P Apte; Sunitha B Thakur; Joseph O Deasy; Elizabeth A Morris Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: J Loncaster; A Armstrong; S Howell; G Wilson; R Welch; A Chittalia; W J Valentine; N J Bundred Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Kathy S Albain; William E Barlow; Steven Shak; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Robert B Livingston; I-Tien Yeh; Peter Ravdin; Roberto Bugarini; Frederick L Baehner; Nancy E Davidson; George W Sledge; Eric P Winer; Clifford Hudis; James N Ingle; Edith A Perez; Kathleen I Pritchard; Lois Shepherd; Julie R Gralow; Carl Yoshizawa; D Craig Allred; C Kent Osborne; Daniel F Hayes Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Alana A Lewin; Sungheon Gene Kim; James S Babb; Amy N Melsaether; Jason McKellop; Melanie Moccaldi; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; Linda Moy Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Joseph A Sparano; Robert J Gray; Della F Makower; Kathleen I Pritchard; Kathy S Albain; Daniel F Hayes; Charles E Geyer; Elizabeth C Dees; Matthew P Goetz; John A Olson; Tracy Lively; Sunil S Badve; Thomas J Saphner; Lynne I Wagner; Timothy J Whelan; Matthew J Ellis; Soonmyung Paik; William C Wood; Peter M Ravdin; Maccon M Keane; Henry L Gomez Moreno; Pavan S Reddy; Timothy F Goggins; Ingrid A Mayer; Adam M Brufsky; Deborah L Toppmeyer; Virginia G Kaklamani; Jeffrey L Berenberg; Jeffrey Abrams; George W Sledge Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Shandong Wu; Margarita L Zuley; Wendie A Berg; Brenda F Kurland; Rachel C Jankowitz; Jules H Sumkin; David Gur Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 4.379