Literature DB >> 33613927

Microscopic Tumour Classification by Digital Mammography.

Jingjing Yang1, Huichao Li1, Ning Shi1, Qifan Zhang1, Yanan Liu2.   

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the classification of microscopic tumours using full digital mammography images. Firstly, to address the shortcomings of traditional image segmentation methods, two different deep learning methods are designed to achieve the segmentation of uterine fibroids. The deep lab model is used to optimize the lesion edge detailed information by using the void convolution algorithm and fully connected CRF, and the two semantic segmentation networks are compared to obtain the best results. The Mask RCNN case segmentation model is used to effectively extract features through the ResNet structure, combined with the RPN network to achieve effective use and fusion of features, and continuously optimize the network training to achieve a fine segmentation of the lesion area, and demonstrate the accuracy and feasibility of the two models in medical image segmentation. Histopathology was used to obtain ER, PR, HER scores, and Ki-67 percentage values for all patients. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival estimation, the Log-rank test was used for single-factor analysis, and Cox proportional risk regression was used for multifactor analysis. The prognostic value of each factor was calculated, as well as the factors affecting progression-free survival. This study was done to compare the imaging characteristics and diagnostic value of mammography and colour Doppler ultrasonography in nonspecific mastitis, improve the understanding of the imaging characteristics of nonspecific mastitis in these two examinations, improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of this type of disease, improve the ability of distinguishing it from breast cancer, and reduce the rate of misdiagnosis.
Copyright © 2021 Jingjing Yang et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33613927      PMCID: PMC7878100          DOI: 10.1155/2021/6635947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Eng        ISSN: 2040-2295            Impact factor:   2.682


  13 in total

1.  Diagnosis of breast cancer in light microscopic and mammographic images textures using relative entropy via kernel estimation.

Authors:  Sevcan Aytac Korkmaz; Mehmet Fatih Korkmaz; Mustafa Poyraz
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Combined Benefit of Quantitative Three-Compartment Breast Image Analysis and Mammography Radiomics in the Classification of Breast Masses in a Clinical Data Set.

Authors:  Karen Drukker; Maryellen L Giger; Bonnie N Joe; Karla Kerlikowske; Heather Greenwood; Jennifer S Drukteinis; Bethany Niell; Bo Fan; Serghei Malkov; Jesus Avila; Leila Kazemi; John Shepherd
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The correlation between mammographic densities and molecular pathology in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yu Ji; Zhenzhen Shao; Junjun Liu; Yujuan Hao; Peifang Liu
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.388

4.  A novel classification scheme to decline the mortality rate among women due to breast tumor.

Authors:  Bushra Mughal; Muhammad Sharif; Nazeer Muhammad; Tanzila Saba
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.769

5.  Factors affecting the precision of lesion sizing with contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.

Authors:  M Del Mar Travieso-Aja; P Naranjo-Santana; C Fernández-Ruiz; W Severino-Rondón; D Maldonado-Saluzzi; M Rodríguez Rodríguez; V Vega-Benítez; O P Luzardo
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Breast Cancer Molecular Subtype Prediction by Mammographic Radiomic Features.

Authors:  Wenjuan Ma; Yumei Zhao; Yu Ji; Xinpeng Guo; Xiqi Jian; Peifang Liu; Shandong Wu
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Imaging features that distinguish pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from DCIS with microinvasion.

Authors:  Hongli Wang; Jinjiang Lin; Jianguo Lai; Cui Tan; Yaping Yang; Ran Gu; Xiaofang Jiang; Fengtao Liu; Yue Hu; Fengxi Su
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-03

8.  Comparison of the Mammography, Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and Ultrasonography in a Group of 116 patients.

Authors:  Elzbieta Luczyńska; Sylwia Heinze; Agnieszka Adamczyk; Janusz Rys; Jerzy W Mitus; Edward Hendrick
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  Deep Learning to Improve Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammography.

Authors:  Li Shen; Laurie R Margolies; Joseph H Rothstein; Eugene Fluder; Russell McBride; Weiva Sieh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Clinical performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in pre-surgical evaluation of breast malignant lesions in dense breasts: a single center study.

Authors:  Anna Bozzini; Luca Nicosia; Giancarlo Pruneri; Patrick Maisonneuve; Lorenza Meneghetti; Giuseppe Renne; Andrea Vingiani; Enrico Cassano; Mauro Giuseppe Mastropasqua
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.