Literature DB >> 33613778

EMF 35 JMIP study for Japan's long-term climate and energy policy: scenario designs and key findings.

Masahiro Sugiyama1, Shinichiro Fujimori2,3,4, Kenichi Wada5, Ken Oshiro2, Etsushi Kato6, Ryoichi Komiyama7, Diego Silva Herran3,8, Yuhji Matsuo9, Hiroto Shiraki10, Yiyi Ju1.   

Abstract

In June, 2019, Japan submitted its mid-century strategy to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and pledged 80% emissions cuts by 2050. The strategy has not gone through a systematic analysis, however. The present study, Stanford Energy Modeling Forum (EMF) 35 Japan Model Intercomparison project (JMIP), employs five energy-economic and integrated assessment models to evaluate the nationally determined contribution and mid-century strategy of Japan. EMF 35 JMIP conducts a suite of sensitivity analyses on dimensions including emissions constraints, technology availability, and demand projections. The results confirm that Japan needs to deploy all of its mitigation strategies at a substantial scale, including energy efficiency, electricity decarbonization, and end-use electrification. Moreover, they suggest that with the absence of structural changes in the economy, heavy industries will be one of the hardest to decarbonize. Partitioning of the sum of squares based on a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) reconfirms that mitigation strategies, such as energy efficiency and electrification, are fairly robust across models and scenarios, but that the cost metrics are uncertain. There is a wide gap of policy strength and breadth between the current policy instruments and those suggested by the models. Japan should strengthen its climate action in all aspects of society and economy to achieve its long-term target. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11625-021-00913-2.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon neutrality; Climate change mitigation; Integrated assessment; Long-term strategy; National climate policy; Net-zero emissions; Uncertainty

Year:  2021        PMID: 33613778      PMCID: PMC7887567          DOI: 10.1007/s11625-021-00913-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sustain Sci        ISSN: 1862-4057            Impact factor:   6.367


  5 in total

1.  The technology path to deep greenhouse gas emissions cuts by 2050: the pivotal role of electricity.

Authors:  James H Williams; Andrew DeBenedictis; Rebecca Ghanadan; Amber Mahone; Jack Moore; William R Morrow; Snuller Price; Margaret S Torn
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Net-zero emissions energy systems.

Authors:  Steven J Davis; Nathan S Lewis; Matthew Shaner; Sonia Aggarwal; Doug Arent; Inês L Azevedo; Sally M Benson; Thomas Bradley; Jack Brouwer; Yet-Ming Chiang; Christopher T M Clack; Armond Cohen; Stephen Doig; Jae Edmonds; Paul Fennell; Christopher B Field; Bryan Hannegan; Bri-Mathias Hodge; Martin I Hoffert; Eric Ingersoll; Paulina Jaramillo; Klaus S Lackner; Katharine J Mach; Michael Mastrandrea; Joan Ogden; Per F Peterson; Daniel L Sanchez; Daniel Sperling; Joseph Stagner; Jessika E Trancik; Chi-Jen Yang; Ken Caldeira
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Taking stock of national climate policies to evaluate implementation of the Paris Agreement.

Authors:  Mark Roelfsema; Heleen L van Soest; Mathijs Harmsen; Detlef P van Vuuren; Christoph Bertram; Michel den Elzen; Niklas Höhne; Gabriela Iacobuta; Volker Krey; Elmar Kriegler; Gunnar Luderer; Keywan Riahi; Falko Ueckerdt; Jacques Després; Laurent Drouet; Johannes Emmerling; Stefan Frank; Oliver Fricko; Matthew Gidden; Florian Humpenöder; Daniel Huppmann; Shinichiro Fujimori; Kostas Fragkiadakis; Keii Gi; Kimon Keramidas; Alexandre C Köberle; Lara Aleluia Reis; Pedro Rochedo; Roberto Schaeffer; Ken Oshiro; Zoi Vrontisi; Wenying Chen; Gokul C Iyer; Jae Edmonds; Maria Kannavou; Kejun Jiang; Ritu Mathur; George Safonov; Saritha Sudharmma Vishwanathan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Industrial decarbonization under Japan's national mitigation scenarios: a multi-model analysis.

Authors:  Yiyi Ju; Masahiro Sugiyama; Etsushi Kato; Yuhji Matsuo; Ken Oshiro; Diego Silva Herran
Journal:  Sustain Sci       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 6.367

5.  Energy transformation cost for the Japanese mid-century strategy.

Authors:  Shinichiro Fujimori; Ken Oshiro; Hiroto Shiraki; Tomoko Hasegawa
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Industrial decarbonization under Japan's national mitigation scenarios: a multi-model analysis.

Authors:  Yiyi Ju; Masahiro Sugiyama; Etsushi Kato; Yuhji Matsuo; Ken Oshiro; Diego Silva Herran
Journal:  Sustain Sci       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 6.367

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.